Kevin O'Hara — Direct
417 linesPROCEEDINGS June 3, 2024
(Court in session at 9:04 a.m.)
(Defendant present. Jury present.)
COURT CLERK: 22-117, Commonwealth versus Karen Read. Could I have counsel identify themselves for the record?
MR. LALLY: Adam Lally, for the Commonwealth. Good morning, Your Honor.
JUDGE CANNONE: Good morning, Mr. Lally.
MS. MCLAUGHLIN: Good morning, Your Honor. Laura McLaughlin, for the Commonwealth.
JUDGE CANNONE: Good morning, Ms. McLaughlin.
MR. JACKSON: Good morning, Your Honor. Alan Jackson, for Ms. Read.
JUDGE CANNONE: Good morning, Mr. Jackson.
MS. LITTLE: Good morning, Your Honor. Elizabeth Little, also on behalf of Karen Read.
MR. YANNETTI: Good morning, Your Honor. David Yannetti, for Karen Read.
JUDGE CANNONE: Good morning, Mr. Yannetti. Good morning, Ms. Read. Good morning, jurors. So I have those three questions for you. Was everyone able to follow the instructions and refrain from discussing this case with anyone since we left here last week? Everyone said "yes" or nodded affirmatively. Were you also able to follow the instructions and refrain from doing any independent research or investigation into this case? Everyone said "yes" or nodded affirmatively. Did anyone happen to see, hear or read anything about this case since we were last in court? Everyone said "no" or shook their heads. Now, jurors, before we start, I do want to give you that instruction again on what is evidence. So in considering the testimony of any witness, remember that the questions that are asked are not evidence. Only the answers, which are really the only part of the exchange between the lawyers and the witnesses that are under oath, are evidence. So if a witness is asked, isn't it true that after you learned that your uncle left you money in his will you poisoned him, and the witness answers, no, then, based solely on that question and answer, there is no evidence that the witness has an uncle, that the uncle had a will, that the uncle left the witness money, that the witness knew that the uncle left the witness money or that the witness poisoned him. So keep that in mind for reference when you're listening to testimony. All right. Mr. Lally, who is your first witness?
MR. LALLY: Your Honor, the Commonwealth would call Lieutenant Kevin O'Hara to the stand.
JUDGE CANNONE: Okay.
Whereupon, KEVIN O'HARA having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified under oath as follows:
JUDGE CANNONE: Anytime you're ready.
MR. LALLY: Thank you, Your Honor.
DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: Good morning, sir.
MR. O'HARA: Good morning, sir.
MR. LALLY: Could you please state your name and spell your last name for the jury?
MR. O'HARA: Kevin O'Hara, O-H-A-R-A.
MR. LALLY: And how are you employed, sir?
MR. O'HARA: I'm a lieutenant with the Massachusetts State Police.
MR. LALLY: And how long in total have you been a member of the state police?
MR. O'HARA: Just over 22 years.
MR. LALLY: And how long have you held the rank of lieutenant?
MR. O'HARA: Four and a half years.
MR. LALLY: And what is your current assignment within the Massachusetts State Police?
MR. O'HARA: I'm the team commander for the State Police Special Emergency Response Team, which is also known as SERT.
MR. LALLY: And the SERT team within the state police, approximately how many members of that unit are there?
MR. O'HARA: There's 61 team members, four of which are full time, including myself. The other 57 have other primary duty assignments, and SERT is an additional duty for them.
MR. LALLY: Now, generally speaking, what are sort of the duties and responsibilities over what is it that the SERT unit within the state police does?
MR. O'HARA: SERT is the primary search and rescue team for the state police. We conduct lost/missing person searches, evidence searches. We do security or crowd control at large-scale events such as the Fourth of July, the Boston Marathon, Gillette Stadium, dignitary security.
MR. LALLY: And how long has it been -- have long have you been assigned to that particular unit?
MR. O'HARA: Since 2014.
MR. LALLY: Now, were you working with that unit on January 29th, 2022?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, I was, sir.
MR. LALLY: And, at some point in the afternoon on that day, were you contacted by Lieutenant Brian Tully of the state police?
MR. O'HARA: Yes. At 2:32 p.m., Lieutenant Tully gave me a phone call.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as Lieutenant Tully is concerned, were you familiar with him or were you familiar with what units he supervises?
MR. O'HARA: Yes. I know he's the supervisor for the Norfolk County State Police Detective Unit.
MR. LALLY: Now, if you could, describe to the jury sort of the process by which your particular unit is activated. Is that an instantaneous thing or how does that work?
MR. O'HARA: Normally, we'll receive a courtesy phone call, which I received from Lieutenant Tully, seeing if we were available, if we had members that could respond today for an incident that he had ongoing. I told him we would be available. He then has to submit a request through his chain of command, which is the division of investigative services. I also have to submit a request up my chain of command which is through field services to get approval on my end. It has to be approved by the special operations commander, which is a major. And, depending upon the request, it may even go above his level to the lieutenant colonel, who is in charge of the division of field services.
MR. LALLY: So that initial call that you received about 2:32 in the afternoon, how would you characterize that first call?
MR. O'HARA: Again, I'd say it was more of a courtesy notification just to make sure that we weren't on another assignment, that we had members that could respond that day. Obviously, there was the weather issue that day and making sure members could respond to the scene.
MR. LALLY: And the weather issue that day? What kind of weather issue are we talking about?
MR. O'HARA: It was a blizzard. I think most areas had received between 18 to 20 inches of snow.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as that initial phone call with Lieutenant Tully as far as what was described to you as far as the situation that you'd be responding to -- or what, if anything, did he say in regard to that?
MR. O'HARA: He said that they were conducting a death investigation in the town of Canton. He was looking for assistance with an evidence search.
MR. LALLY: And how did you respond to that request on that initial phone call?
MR. O'HARA: I told him we would have members that would be able to respond and that I would start working on the approval process. Looking out my own window, I had been outside my house that day. I had large snow drifts at the end of my driveway. I told him, building a roster and having members clear their driveway, at least an hour plus on our response time.
MR. LALLY: And, following that initial conversation, did Lieutenant Tully reach back out to you at some point?
MR. O'HARA: Yeah. I'm not positive if he called me or if I called him. I think after I cleared my driveway, I spoke to my captain just to make sure, to see what the status was on the approval process on our end. He said we were cleared on our end. So either Lieutenant Tully called me or I may have called him because I was getting nervous. My driveway was clear, but the town plow was going to come back and bury the end of my driveway again. So I'm not sure who called who, but I called him and told him that we were cleared through the division of field services. He also told me that we were cleared on his end; the approval request had been approved.
MR. LALLY: And do you know approximately what time of day it was that you had that second conversation with Lieutenant Tully?
MR. O'HARA: It was probably about quarter of four, because we sent out an alert to our team at 3:48, telling them that we were authorized to respond to Canton.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as your team was concerned, can you speak a bit about sort of that process as far as the response and who was to respond and how you were able to sort of pull together the bodies to respond?
MR. O'HARA: So SERT is broken up. We are geographically dispersed across the state. So we have an east team, a west team. I had reached out to the supervisor from the west team, someone I know who I wouldn't request to drive that far in the snowing conditions to set up a roster for us. So he sent out an alert to the team at 2:53, requesting an availability list. I told him to just confirm that the people responding either hada truck or some kind of four-wheel drive vehicle to respond.
MR. LALLY: And where was it that you were told or where did you eventually respond to?
MR. O'HARA: Lieutenant Tully told us that we were going to 34 Fairview Road in Canton.
MR. LALLY: And, from the time that you cleared your driveway, secured response from your higher-ups, about what time was it that you left or how long did it take you to get from your home to 34 Fairview Road?
MR. O'HARA: Like I stated, the alert went out, authorizing the team to start responding at 3:48. I got the exact address via text from Lieutenant Tully at 4:10. We sent out another alert message at 4:17, just reminding people to bring shovels, brooms, rakes, et cetera. I left my house at 4:13 in the afternoon, and I got on scene at 4:56. So it took me 43 minutes to drive there.
MR. LALLY: And from your house to that location in Canton, about how -- absent sort of the weather, how long a drive would that normally be?
MR. O'HARA: Probably 20 minutes, sir.
MR. LALLY: And, when you respond, how many other members of your unit were able to respond and responded to the scene that day?
MR. O'HARA: Initially, we dispatched eight members, including myself. Only seven of us made it to the scene. One of the members could not get off his street. The end of the street had been plowed in by his town. He had called his town, DPW, to try to get some assistance, but he was not able to make it to the scene. So we only had seven, again, after we initially started at eight, which kind of shifts some of the dynamics of how we ran the search on scene.
MR. LALLY: And, getting to that in a moment, when you first arrived on scene, who, if anyone else, preceded your arrival there or who was on scene when you got there?
MR. O'HARA: Just one other trooper from SERT. Trooper Jay Beausoleil was on scene. I believe he arrived two minutes to my arrival.
JUDGE CANNONE: Could you say that name again and spell it?
MR. O'HARA: Yes. It's Trooper Jason Beausoleil. It's B-E-A-U-S-O-L-E-I-L.
JUDGE CANNONE: Thank you.
MR. O'HARA: You're welcome.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: And, Lieutenant O'Hara, when you arrived on scene, where did you park in relation to the house and where was Trooper Beausoleil in relation to the house?
MR. O'HARA: Trooper Beausoleil was just past the driveway of the house, just north of the driveway. I parked almost at the end of the driveway of 34 Fairview.
MR. LALLY: And do you recall -- at some point, your attention was directed to an area with a flagpole anda fire hydrant; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: And do you recall which direction either or both of your vehicle and Trooper Beausoleil's vehicle were facing when you parked in that area of the driveway?
MR. O'HARA: We were facing away from the flagpole originally. Eventually, we moved Trooper Beausoleil's vehicle back towards the flagpole. Just we wanted some extra headlights to light up the scene, the area we would be working in.
MR. LALLY: Now, Lieutenant Tully. Was he on scene when you arrived?
MR. O'HARA: He was not.
MR. LALLY: At some point, did you reach out to him?
MR. O'HARA: Yes. I gave him a call. He stated he was just leaving Canton P.D. and would be on scene in about five minutes. It was probably around 5:00 o'clock.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as the house that you were parked in front of and as far as the residences on that street, who, if anyone else, as far as neighbors or anything like that or people from the house, did you see outside of the house at any point in time when you were there?
MR. O'HARA: We didn't see anyone outside the house. A resident of 34 Fairview exited briefly after we were first on scene. That was the only person we saw.
MR. LALLY: And exited and came down to where you were, or where did that person go?
MR. O'HARA: No. He was -- if you look at the house, there is two front doors, one closer to the garage, which was maybe a mudroom or a den. An adult male exited from that door, had a hooded sweatshirt on. He asked us if we were here for what had happened earlier. We said, yes. And he walked back inside the house.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as the -- you mentioned a bit about the snow. But, as far as the roadway conditions of the area you were in, what, if anything, did you note or observe in regard to the roadway and sort of how it had been treated or plowed prior to your arrival?
MR. O'HARA: The plow had really only cleared the center of the road. There was a good three- to four-foot snowdrift coming off each side of the road. So maybe enough for two vehicles to pass but not cleared curb to curb.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as Lieutenant Tully arriving to the scene around five, at some point, did he -- what, if anything -- where did he direct you to?
MR. O'HARA: He instructed us that the death investigation involved a motor vehicle. He told us where the motor vehicle was believed to have been parked and wanted us to search from that area, south towards the flagpole/fire hydrant.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as this type of search was concerned, had you -- what, if any, experience did you have doing this type of search in these types of conditions?
MR. O'HARA: In blizzard conditions, we've really never done evidence searches like this. We've done missing person searches we've gone out to. But for evidence searches, nothing like this. If something -- if a scene could be secured, we really wouldn't respond ina Situation like this unless we really needed to.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as the search that your team does, if you could -- is it typical or is it not typical as far as conducting a search of an area that had already been gone over by another agency or by someone else within the state police?
MR. O'HARA: We are a Stage II response. So pretty much every search we've ever done has been previously searched. We're never really the first person to search an area.
MR. LALLY: And can you describe sort of, I guess, the difference between what you do as far as searching is concerned and sort of looking or making observations or things of that nature?
MR. O'HARA: I think our training is a lot different than maybe the regular patrolmen or trooper responding. There's not much training provided anymore in the academies. So we do extensive training through a lot of the search-and-rescue groups that we are a part of, which would be the National Association for Search and Rescue, which is NASAR. We do search and rescue initial actions. We do line searching, managing lost person incidents. We do multiple trainings a month with the team which is different than what other personnel would get, I think. Traditionally looking back to even my time before I was a member of SERT, a search would be, you go this way, I'll go that way. There was really no methodical approach to the search.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as your training is concerned as it relates to this particular search, what, if any, sort of methodical approach did you develop or what did you employ in this particular case?
MR. O'HARA: We gridded off or marked off the area Lieutenant Tully thought would be the best area for us to search. So we had a starting point and an end point. Once all the members got on scene, we set up a line search or what we would call a grid search which, again, would be just a slow, methodical search with all of us working in unison, moving through the area.
MR. LALLY: And about how big an area was it that you initially sort of set out to search?
MR. O'HARA: It was just over 50 feet, I believe, from the front door, which is the left door, looking at the house from the street, to the fire hydrant. I believe it was 59 feet.
MR. LALLY: Was that length or width?
MR. O'HARA: That is length.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as the width of the area that you were searching, about what kind of area were you searching?
MR. O'HARA: About three to four feet. There was a snowdrift coming off the curb.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as the information that you received prior to conducting the search, were there any items that were specifically identified as far as items that you might be looking for or what, if anything, was given to you in relation to that?
MR. O'HARA: Lieutenant Tully had informed us that the victim in this case was struck by a vehicle. He believed there would be broken pieces of taillight in the area. He also stated the victim was missing his sneaker. So he asked to search for both of those items.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, at some point, did you ask Lieutenant Tully any questions about the vehicle in question or anything in relation to that?
MR. O'HARA: After we had found one or two of the pieces of the taillight, I asked him if he knew how big, how much damage was the taillight or if he had a photo that we could get of the taillight.
MR. LALLY: And what, if anything, did he tell you?
MR. O'HARA: He told us at that time the vehicle was being towed back to Canton P.D. So he did not have a photo to show us.
MR. LALLY: And, at any point, did he make any reference to who was coming along with the tow to Canton P.D.?
MR. O'HARA: He said Sergeant Bukhenik and Trooper Proctor were following the vehicle back to Canton P.D.
MR. LALLY: You mentioned an alert that was sent out to the troopers as far as to bring certain items. Can you describe for the jury sort of the process and what, if any, tools or implements you used and sort of how that search was conducted?
MR. O'HARA: So like I said, we moved Trooper Beausoleil's vehicle to face the scene to use his headlights for extra light for the scene. All the team members also put on a headlamp which was basically just like a hiking headlamp. We all had shovels. We had a couple of rakes, the smaller garden rakes, just to kind of help us sift through the snow. And I also had a small push broom to move the snow around, as well.
MR. LALLY: Now, you mentioned sort of the headlamps and moving the vehicle as far as the headlights on the area that you were searching. What was the visibility and what was the lighting conditions around that area at that time you were conducting the search?
MR. O'HARA: It was poor lighting. There really wasn't much as far as street lighting. But, with the headlamps, we had decent visibility.
MR. LALLY: So when you first arrived on scene about 4:53 p.m. or so, was it dark out then?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it was.
MR. LALLY: Okay. And it remained dark while you were still on scene?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: And, in the area that you were looking, is it your testimony there wasn't much overhead sort of ambient lighting or street lighting in that area as far as you recall?
MR. O'HARA: Nothing that really helped the search.
MR. LALLY: So the area you were searching was in the area of the fire hydrant; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: We started almost directly across from the front door and moved south towards Chapman Street, towards the fire hydrant.
MR. LALLY: And, to be clear, as far as the area that you were searching with the shovels and the other different implements to sort of sift through the snow, where was your focus as far as the street versus the front lawn area?
MR. O'HARA: Our right flank was on the curb and then we moved out across the street from there. So we lined almost shoulder to shoulder as we moved down, as we moved south through the area we were searching.
MR. LALLY: So you're primarily searching or entirely searching along the roadway; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as at some point did you, through the course of sort of the shoveling and the removal of snow from that area, did you approach or come in contact with the area of the grass on the front lawn?
MR. O'HARA: We did. One of the members who was working along the curb, he started to clear some of the grass on the front lawn. Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: And what, if any, issues did you and the other troopers encounter when you got to sort of the grass area?
MR. O'HARA: It was very difficult to clear the snow. I don't think we had very good visibility in what we were moving, even with the push broom and the rake. It was very difficult to definitively say we had cleared the lawn properly. So we didn't focus too much of our efforts on that area.
MR. LALLY: Now, you referenced that only seven members of your unit were able to respond because one got stuck in the snow at the end of his street; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: And that had some impact as far as documentation of the scene; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. Normally on a search if I'm the overall -- as a team leader, I would run what you would consider the command post, be the incident commander for SERT. I would stay behind the line and kind of document our efforts. But, because this was such a small search area, it wasn't really an issue because we weren't breaking people off in a team to know it was out of my sight line. And we had multiple detectives on scene that were able to fill that role for me.
MR. LALLY: And so to that point, as far as the seven members from your unit, in addition to the seven members from your unit, who, if anyone else, was present during the course of that search?
MR. O'HARA: I believe there were five other members. I believe there were only two that I recognized from the state police. So I'm not sure who the other three were, whether they were Canton detectives or Canton patrolmen. But they were all dressed in plainclothes.
MR. LALLY: And, as far a documentation for the scene, what, if anything, was done with reference to that and by who?
MR. O'HARA: As we began to find evidence, I spoke to Lieutenant Tully just to confirm that he was going to document everything we were recovering via photograph and evidence log.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as were documents or photos taken by Lieutenant Tully?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, they were, sir.
MR. LALLY: And the items that were photographed, were they photographed prior to anyone sort of touching them or moving them or placing them other than what was sort of related to the search effort?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. As soon as we found anything deemed as evidence, we stopped our search efforts until they were documented by Lieutenant Tully.
MR. LALLY: And, in reference to your search efforts, what, if anything, of evidentiary value did you and your team locate?
MR. O'HARA: We found multiple pieces of red and clear taillight.
MR. LALLY: And where were they in relation to sort of the grid or the area that you had set up to search?
MR. O'HARA: They were on the street, in between the flagpole and the fire hydrant.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, in addition to the pieces of red and clear plastic of a taillight that you uncovered, do you know approximately how many pieces of that you were able to locate on that day?
MR. O'HARA: I believe maybe six or seven pieces.
MR. LALLY: And how big or how small or did they range in size as far as the pieces that you located?
MR. O'HARA: There was three larger pieces, two red, one clear and then a couple smaller pieces.
MR. LALLY: In addition to the pieces of red and clear plastic taillight that were uncovered during the search process, what, if any, other items of interest were located?
MR. O'HARA: We found a sneaker.
MR. LALLY: And where was that sneaker located in reference to the scene and your search efforts and in reference to the pieces of clear and red plastic?
MR. O'HARA: It was the same location generally. It was in between the flagpole and the fire hydrant. The sneaker was flush up against the curb, and it was upside down. I think we found one piece of taillight prior to the sneaker. And then after we found the sneaker, we found a few more additional pieces of taillight.
MR. LALLY: Now, with reference to the sneaker and each of those pieces of red and clear plastic, where were they in relation to the snow that was being dug through? And, by that, where were they in relation to the ground?
MR. O'HARA: Can you repeat the end of that, sir?
MR. LALLY: Sure. With reference to each of the items of evidence that you've been talking about, whether it be the sneaker or the red and clear plastic, where were they in relation to the snow that you were digging into? Where were they in relation to the asphalt surface of the roadway?
MR. O'HARA: Close to the curb. As we started digging originally, the snowdrift, the snow pack was pretty solid from where the plow had cleared to. So once we were able to move through that, we started getting into fresh, undisturbed snow and started moving through that, which was a lot easier to move at that point. And all of the items we found were close to the curb.
MR. LALLY: And so my question, also, sir, is sort of how deep within the snow that you were digging was each of those items?
MR. O'HARA: They were all found at ground level.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as the area that you were searching beyond sort of snowdrifts and plowing toward the middle of the road, how would you characterize that snow as far as did you observe any footprints or any tire tracks or anything in that area where you were digging through and finding these items?
MR. O'HARA: No. We did not see anything, sir. Like I said, it was all fresh, undisturbed snow once we got past wherever the plow had cleared up to.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as this search being conducted sort of physically, you mentioned there is some sort of line that's set up; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: And can you describe for the jury sort of how that line was set up? What were the different functions and different parts of the line and where were you in relation to that?
MR. O'HARA: Like I stated, we had what we considered our right flank stood on the curb closest to the house, and then we moved left into the street. As we dug the snow out, it was originally inspected as they would pull their shovel out and make sure they didn't have anything in their shovel to the best of their ability. And then they would bring it out to the street. I was the left flank. They would dump it in the street, and I would sift through it at the end, just to make sure there was no evidence that had come out to the street. Once I was positive that nothing was in that snow, I would toss it onto the other side of the street. We just continued that process as we moved south through that grid.
MR. LALLY: And the depth of the snow that you were digging through, how did that change or how was that any different from sort of one portion of the section to another?
MR. O'HARA: Where the plow had touched, you know, clear to, I'd say that was probably about a three-plus foot in height. But, as we moved into the snow, itself, getting closer to the curb, I was in level with the rest of the area, what was on the front lawn, what was on the neighbor's lawn. So probably maybe 18 inches of snow.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, as far as this search was concerned, about how long a period of time was it that you were on scene as far as searching? How long a process are we talking about?
MR. O'HARA: After Lieutenant Tully showed up and kind of informed us where we were going to search, we moved Trooper Beausoleil's vehicle at 5:20. And that's when the rest of the team started to show up, right around 5:21, 5:24. A couple of other members with extended response time showed up a little bit after that. But all members were on scene by 5:41. We had already started the process before they had all arrived on scene, and we were complete by 6:15. We started to wrap up and clear the area.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as the wrapping up, how was that decision arrived at and sort of what led to that decision at that point?
MR. O'HARA: So after we found the sneaker and a couple of additional pieces of taillight, we moved south for, I'd say, over five feet, maybe closer to eight to 10 feet, without finding any other pieces of evidence. Lieutenant Tully and I had a conversation. He was very satisfied that we had found everything we were going to locate at that time, and we decided to suspend the search.
MR. LALLY: And what was -- as far as you were concerned with weather conditions and everything that had gone on or what you had located at that point, what was sort of your thought process in relation to any sort of continuation of the search at some later time?
MR. O'HARA: I told Lieutenant Tully, we'll do a debrief at the end. We'll go over probability of detection, how I feel, whether we found everything that was there. I told him there was a good chance we did not find everything and said, if you want us to come back in the daylight to give us better lighting to search or after a couple of days, the weather was supposed to warm up, if you wanted us to come back after there was some snow melt just to reach out to me and we would come back.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as suspending the search at that point, was that something that was your decision independent of Lieutenant Tully?
MR. O'HARA: No. That was in consultation with Lieutenant Tully.
MR. LALLY: Now, you mentioned Troopers Bukhenik and Proctor or you received information that they were following a vehicle to the station; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: At any point in time that you were on scene, did you -- do you know either Sergeant Bukhenik or Trooper Proctor?
MR. O'HARA: Yes. I know both of them, sir.
MR. LALLY: And, at any point in time that you were on scene, did you see either Sergeant Bukhenik or Trooper Proctor in the area of 34 Fairview during the entire time you were there?
MR. O'HARA: No. They were not on scene.
MR. LALLY: So the other sort of troopers that you had mentioned around, they were not them, correct?
MR. O'HARA: They were not there, no.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as the securing of evidence, how is that done sort of generally speaking in relation to searches that your unit conducts, and how was it done in this specific case?
MR. O'HARA: So we don't recover evidence. We will stop and halt our search. Sometimes we've been waiting for crime scene to show up for two hours before we continue the search. So once we found the first piece of taillight, again, I conferred with Lieutenant Tully and asked him if he was documenting it and covering everything. He stated that he was. Once we felt comfortable that he had done that properly, we then continued the search.
MR. LALLY: Sir, once you get sort of that initial parameters as far as where and what you may be looking for from Lieutenant Tully, is Lieutenant Tully directing your search efforts in any way, shape or form?
MR. O'HARA: He is not, no.
MR. LALLY: And is that typical as far as how searches would be conducted?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. Yes. They let me run the search the way I deem best.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, in addition to the photographs, what, if anything, else was done to document the scene?
MR. O'HARA: We had one of our members use a handheld GPS, which we use a Garmin 64ST. And he marked each item we found which we then can upload later to a map, which we did later that evening.
MR. LALLY: And, if you could, just describe to the jury that process as far as mapping is concerned and sort of how global positioning systems or GPSs are utilized in creating that?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. So the Garmin GPS that we use, it connects to four different satellites to give you a best range of your location. There obviously is some range error involved with GPSs. But he was able to stamp three of the items, three pieces of the taillight. But, as he was marking those items on his GPS, they kept -- because they were in such close proximity, they were almost marking directly on top of each other. So he only marked three of them because it was just going to clutter the map as we continued if we were to mark all of these that we located.
MR. LALLY: Sir, with respect to the three pieces of taillight that were marked on the diagram, were those the larger pieces, smaller pieces or something else?
MR. O'HARA: They were the larger pieces, sir.
MR. LALLY: May I approach the witness, Your Honor?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: Sir, I'm showing you a series of 24 photographs and ask you to just look at those briefly. I am going to ask you in a moment if you recognize them. Do you recognize what's in those photographs, sir?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir. It's the area we searched and some of the evidence that we recovered.
MR. LALLY: Your Honor, the Commonwealth would seek to introduce and admit as the next exhibits.
JUDGE CANNONE: Any objection, Mr. Yannetti?
MR. YANNETTI: There is no objection, Your Honor. Thank you.
(Whereupon, photographs were entered and marked Exhibits No. 111 through 134 in Evidence.)
MR. LALLY: While they are being marked, may we approach briefly? I'm sorry. She needs to have her attention on the marking. I'm sorry.
COURT REPORTER: Exhibits 111 through 134.
JUDGE CANNONE: Thank you. Jurors, it's very important that we keep our record straight. It will be important for you during the deliberations that we do this. Sometimes it takes a while. We are fortunate we've got such a great court reporter here to take care of this for us but sometimes it takes a while. I caution counsel that maybe you can all work together so we can do this and not take up any extra time. All right. Do you need those photos back, Mr. Lally?
MR. LALLY: Yes, Your Honor.
MR. YANNETTI: May we approach, Your Honor?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
(Whereupon, there was a sidebar conference as follows:)
MR. YANNETTI: I just want to make sure there is no confusion. The exhibits, when they were shown to me, all had exhibit numbers on them dated April 30th with the court reporter's initials. Were those -- I want to know what those were. Were those premarked and never introduced into evidence? Because the way they look to me, the trial stated on April 29. I thought these were in based on what I was looking at.
COURT REPORTER: If I may, just for the record -- this is the court reporter speaking -- I put a slash mark in all of those. Those were never entered. They were marked pretrial in agreement or pre-witness in agreement.
MR. YANNETTI: I see.
COURT REPORTER: I put a slash through each one. That's what took me so long.
MR. YANNETTI: So they were never introduced.
COURT REPORTER: They were never introduced.
JUDGE CANNONE: And then numbers these exhibits too --
MR. YANNETTI: I just wanted to make sure.
(Whereupon, the sidebar conference concluded.)
MR. LALLY: Your Honor, with the Court's permission, may I publish what's just been marked as those exhibits for the jury?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
MR. LALLY: May I approach the witness, Your Honor?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: So what you have before you is a laser pointer. Just click on that and point to the screen if I or anyone asks you to do so. All right?
MR. O'HARA: Okay. Thank you.
MR. LALLY: Ms. Gilman, if you could put up --
MR. LALLY: So, Lieutenant O'Hara, what you have up on the screen before you, is that what you have as Exhibit 134? I'm sorry. 111. I apologize.
MR. O'HARA: Yes. 111, sir.
MR. LALLY: If you could describe for the jury -- using that laser pointer, what, if anything, of significance do you observe in this particular photograph?
MR. O'HARA: This is a flagpole in front of the house. As you move south, this appears to be one of the pieces of taillight that we recovered.
MR. LALLY: Ms. Gilman, if you could zoom back out a little.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as when you're conducting the search or when the actual searching process is ongoing, what was the weather doing while you were doing that --
COURT REPORTER: I'm having a hard time hearing --
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes, because of the air- conditioning. So you need to speak up really loudly into that microphone.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: And so, Lieutenant, during the course of the process as you're conducting this search, what was the weather doing and is that something you can observe in this photograph?
MR. O'HARA: It was still snowing, and you can see some of the snowflakes falling here by the flagpole.
MR. LALLY: As far as the wind was concerned, what, if any, impact did the wind have on the searches you were conducting?
MR. O'HARA: It was windy, but it really didn't impact how we were searching through the area.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, if I could direct your attention to the next photograph, 112.
MR. O'HARA: Okay.
MR. LALLY: And, again, sir, what's up on the screen, is that what you have before you?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is.
MR. LALLY: Is this sort of a different perspective of the same area that you were talking about in the last photograph; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: If I could have the next photograph, 113.
MR. LALLY: Again, what's up on the screen, is that what you have before you as 113?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is.
MR. LALLY: And, again, sort of a closer perspective to the piece of taillight that you were referring to; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: If I could have the next photograph, please.
JUDGE CANNONE: You really have to speak up.
MR. LALLY: Yes, Your Honor.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: Again, Lieutenant, what's up on the screen, is that what you have before you?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is.
MR. LALLY: Again, a closer-up image of that same piece of taillight as it was observed when you recovered it?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. And you can see right here to the left of the taillight, that is the molding of a shovel. So this piece of taillight was picked up by one of the team members' shovels. And, as they overturned it, you can see the taillight came up as they were searching through the area. And this is kind of the markings of the shovel, itself.
MR. LALLY: If I could have the next --
COURT REPORTER: I didn't hear that.
JUDGE CANNONE: So we are going to have to turn the air-conditioner off.
MR. LALLY: I'll scream if I have to. The issue is I'm trying to move away from the podium.
JUDGE CANNONE: I understand, but we need to turn the air-conditioner off.
MR. LALLY: Understood.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: And, again, Lieutenant, what's up on the screen, is that what you have before you as the next exhibit?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is.
MR. LALLY: And if you could describe for the jury what we are looking at in this photograph?
MR. O'HARA: You can see the piece of taillight that we recovered. And, again, this is the overturned snow from the shovel and, again, seeing the markings from the shovel from where it was overturned.
MR. LALLY: And the next photograph, Ms. Gilman.
MR. LALLY: This particular piece, is this one of the larger or is this one of the smaller pieces that you were describing earlier in your testimony?
MR. O'HARA: This is one of the larger pieces, sir.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as length or size of it, if you know, how much would you estimate how big is it?
MR. O'HARA: I guess a couple of inches. But I didn't measure it, sir.
MR. LALLY: Ms. Gilman, if I could have the next photograph?
MR. LALLY: And, Lieutenant, if you could describe to the jury sort of what is depicted or what, if anything, of significance you observed in this photograph?
MR. O'HARA: So this is the SERT members working through the area, again, working as a line through the grid formation. One of the things we stress is critical separation, making sure you're close enough to each other that you won't miss a piece of evidence. If you are too far apart, you will miss that. A lot of times before searches, we will take an item of similar, Similar size item that we are looking for, and we will space out. Because this was such a condensed search area, we just had the team members stand almost shoulder to shoulder as they searched through the area.
MR. LALLY: And the next photograph, Ms. Gilman.
MR. LALLY: Again, sir, if you could describe for the jury sort of what we're looking at or what, if anything, of significance you observed in this photograph?
MR. O'HARA: It may be a little difficult to see froma distance. But right here is the sneaker that we recovered.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as the area of curbing that you indicated that sneaker was recovered in relation to, where is that?
MR. O'HARA: It's flush up against the curb.
MR. LALLY: Again, I'm sorry, using the laser pointer --
MR. O'HARA: I apologize, sir. Right here. This would be the curbing right here (indicating.)
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, Ms. Gilman.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, Similar, as far as this photograph is concerned, what, if anything, do you observe in that photograph? What are we looking at?
MR. O'HARA: It's a closer photo of the sneaker. The sneaker is in the bottom, right down here.
MR. LALLY: And the next photograph.
MR. LALLY: And, again, what, if anything, are we looking at in this photograph, sir?
MR. O'HARA: Again, you're looking at the sneaker. This is just a closer, zoomed-in photo. And this would be the curbing right here (indicating).
MR. LALLY: And the sneaker as it's portrayed in this particular photograph, is that as it was when it was recovered?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, Ms. Gilman.
MR. LALLY: Sort of the other side of that sneaker; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: And is that sort of its relation to the curb that you described earlier in your testimony?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir. You can see the curbing right here
(indicating).
MR. LALLY: The next photograph.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as the sneaker was concerned when it's recovered, where was the snow in relation to -- was it on, around, in? Where was the snow in relation to the sneaker?
MR. O'HARA: The sneaker was completely buried. It wasn't until we started digging through the snow that we found the sneaker.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, Ms. Gilman.
MR. LALLY: Again, this is how it was discovered; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: Or how it appeared when it was discovered, I should say?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, Ms. Gilman.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, in this photograph, if you could, using the laser pointer, draw the jury's attention to what, if anything, of significance you observed?
MR. O'HARA: This is Exhibit 125, is the photo I have in front of me. This would be -- it might be difficult for them to see, but this is a clear piece of the taillight right here (indicating).
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, Ms. Gilman.
MR. LALLY: And, again, sir, what is depicted in Exhibit 126?
MR. O'HARA: You can see a little closer, a zoomed-in version of the clear piece of taillight that was recovered.
MR. LALLY: And, as far as the area of snow surrounding, does that sort of depict the depth at which that piece of clear plastic taillight was discovered?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, 127.
MR. LALLY: What, if anything, are we looking at in this one?
MR. O'HARA: A different angle of the piece of clear taillight that was recovered.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, Exhibit 128.
MR. LALLY: Sir, if you could describe for the jury what is depicted in Exhibit 128?
MR. O'HARA: It's difficult to see, but there is a piece of clear taillight right here (indicating). I can see it with the photo in front of me, but I'm not sure if the jurors can see it from that distance. But there is a clear piece of taillight in this location.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, Exhibit 129.
MR. LALLY: And, again, if you could demonstrate to the jury what, if anything, of significance you observe?
MR. O'HARA: Again, there is a piece of clear taillight right in this location (indicating).
MR. LALLY: A different piece of taillight than the one you were referring to previously in the prior exhibits?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, 130.
MR. LALLY: And what, if anything -- what are we looking at here?
MR. O'HARA: Again, there is a piece of clear taillight. It might be difficult from the distance for the jurors, but it's in this location here (indicating).
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, 131.
MR. LALLY: What, if anything, is depicted in Exhibit 131?
MR. O'HARA: There is a larger piece of red taillight located on the ground in this location (indicating).
MR. LALLY: And the next exhibit, 132.
MR. LALLY: What, if anything, are we looking at in 132, sir?
MR. O'HARA: It's a closer photo of the same piece of taillight, right here, located on the ground
(indicating).
MR. LALLY: The next exhibit, 133.
MR. LALLY: What, if anything, is depicted in 133?
MR. O'HARA: There is a small piece of taillight, I believe, in this location right here.
MR. LALLY: And, lastly, Exhibit 134. A It's a small piece of taillight right on the ground, right here in this location (indicating).
MR. LALLY: Thank you, sir.
MR. LALLY: Your Honor, may I approach?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: I'll trade with you, sir, and take those 24 away and give you these two. If you could just take a look at those and look up when you're finished.
MR. O'HARA: (Witness complies.)
MR. LALLY: Do you recognize those?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, I do, sir.
MR. LALLY: What do you recognize those to be?
MR. O'HARA: This is our mapping system we use to map out evidence we recover.
MR. LALLY: Were those diagrams created pursuant to that mapping system?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, they are.
MR. LALLY: What's contained in those diagrams, is that a fair and accurate portrayal of where items were recovered in relation to the various markers on scene at 34 Fairview on January 29th in the afternoon?
MR. O'HARA: Yes. The marks showing on the map, they are a little offset. But that falls within the range of error with the handheld GPSs.
MR. LALLY: May I approach, Your Honor?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
MR. LALLY: The Commonwealth would seek to introduce them as the next two exhibits.
MR. YANNETTI: No objection to the maps.
JUDGE CANNONE: All right. Thank you.
(Whereupon, map was entered and marked Exhibit No. 135 in Evidence.)
(Whereupon, map was entered and marked Exhibit No. 136 in Evidence.)
COURT REPORTER: Exhibits 135 and 136, Your Honor.
JUDGE CANNONE: Thank you.
MR. LALLY: Thank you. And, Your Honor, with the Court's permission, may I publish those in succession to the jury?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: Now, Lieutenant O'Hara, what you have in front of you, the first diagram, 135, is that what's up on the screen?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is, sir.
MR. LALLY: You mentioned something earlier in your testimony just now in regard to sort of items being found in close proximity, creating some overlay with the GPS system; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: And you mentioned range of error; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: Can you describe what the range of error is and how that impacts sort of how it's depicted in this particular diagram?
MR. O'HARA: So GPS's typical range of error on a clear day is up to 16 feet. Obviously, we didn't have a clear day. We had atmospheric conditions, cloudy, snowy conditions. GPSs can be affected for the range accuracy by a few different things. One is the satellite geometry. As I said before, the GPSs connect to four different satellites. You also could have signal blockage. Blockage could occur from trees, buildings, bridges. Then you have atmospheric conditions like I mentioned, and then you have the receiver end, any issues with your receiver end, which is actually the handheld GPS. Those would be the four main issues and why you may have a little offset on your GPS readings. But, again, typically, under clear sky conditions, it would be up to 16 feet.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, using the laser pointer, if you could direct the jury's attention to what, if any, sort of significant markers or what has been marked on this particular diagram?
MR. O'HARA: I've listed this as the command post, which is where my vehicle was parked. We have the address, which is the house, 34 Fairview. Then, as you move further south, you'll see the first red plastic that we recovered which, again, was the larger piece of red plastic. Kind of stamped on top of each other, but you'll see the sneaker. You'll see a second red piece of plastic, and you'll see the fire hydrant all marked on the map.
MR. LALLY: Thank you, sir.
MR. LALLY: Ms. Gilman, if I could have the next diagram, please?
MR. LALLY: Again, sir, what's up on the screen, is that what you have before you as Exhibit No. 136?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is.
MR. LALLY: And, again, if you could describe for the jurors what we are looking at in this diagram or what, if anything, is different between 136 and 135?
MR. O'HARA: We just changed the layering on the map just to make it a little easier to read. So we removed the taillight pieces and now we just have the sneaker and the fire hydrant listed on the map here.
MR. LALLY: And that area as far as you were talking sort of the concentration of the search was in the area of the flagpole and the fire hydrant; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir. We started closer to -- almost directly across from the front door. The evidence recovery all happened between the flagpole and the fire hydrant.
MR. LALLY: And, if you could or if it's possible on this diagram that you have up on the screen, could you, using the laser pointer, direct the jury's attention to sort of where the search began and where the items of evidence were?
MR. O'HARA: The search would have begun right in this area. And, as we moved south, we started finding pieces of evidence right around here (indicating).
MR. LALLY: And then the area that you went about five or somewhere between five and 10 feet, is that your testimony, beyond when you started to not find anymore items of evidentiary value; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. We had gone past the fire hydrant and hadn't found any other pieces of evidence for it's probably closer to eight to 10 feet. And that's when we suspended the search.
MR. LALLY: Sir, just using that laser pointer, if you could direct the jury's attention to that eight to 10 feet? In which direction was that from the items of evidence?
MR. O'HARA: Heading south towards Chapman Street. So down in this location would be where we stopped.
MR. LALLY: Thank you, sir.
MR. LALLY: Your Honor, may I approach just to retrieve?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
BY MR. LALLY:
MR. LALLY: Now, sir, at any point in time that you were on scene, were you able to look at or see any sort of photographs or any images of the damage to the taillight?
MR. O'HARA: No, I was not.
MR. LALLY: So fair to say that at the time that you're conducting your search on that particular afternoon, you weren't aware of how much taillight could be there or how much you might be looking for, correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. We did not know how much damage there was.
MR. LALLY: Now, sir, you talked a little bit about -- well, let me ask you this: As far as from your training and experience in relation to conducting these types of searches, are you familiar with a term known as "POD"?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir. That would be probability of detection.
MR. LALLY: And I believe you've referenced earlier in your testimony some variables that go into that terminology; is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: And can you describe to the jury sort of what some of those variables are and how it related to this particular search?
MR. O'HARA: So probability of detection winds up turning into a mathematical formula to make it simpler, give us more of a baseline objective on how well we did searching the area. It covers 10 different categories. We'll rate those categories one through 10 on how we feel we did and kind of come up with a score to give just a baseline of what we think percentage-wise we would have found, the objects we're looking for. Those categories would include the terrain, number one. Hazards would be two. Lighting would be three. Weather would be four. Vegetation would be five, which, in this case, would have been some of the grass we encountered as we got on the front lawn. As you continue on, with your spacing, which is, again, how the team members are separated as we are searching through the area; the tactics you're using; the area size. Then the team composition and then the last one is instincts and variables. Really the last two, I think, is what works best for us. What stands out most about our team is the team composition and instincts from the experience that we have in searching.
MR. LALLY: And so was it those variables that sort of led to the conclusion in conjunction, yourself and Lieutenant Tully, as far as cease searching at that particular point after you'd gone eight to 10 feet south of the evidentiary items without locating any other evidentiary items?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: Thank you. I have no further questions of this witness. Thank you, sir.
JUDGE CANNONE: All right.
MR. O'HARA: Thank you, sir.
JUDGE CANNONE: Mr. Yannetti?
MR. YANNETTI: Thank you, Your Honor.