Trial 2 Trial Day
◀ Day 28 Trial 2 Day 30 ▶

Day 29 - June 9, 2025

Wolfe (redirect cont), Tedman, Laposata

13Proceedings
8Pages
3Witnesses
2,027Lines
Day 29 of 36
Appearing:

A sweatshirt-hole dispute prompted a mistrial motion. Dr. Elizabeth Laposata's dog-bite opinions were excluded; she described a backward-fall head-injury pattern and said a small object or fist could account for an eyelid laceration.

Full day summary

Day 29 opened with pretrial motions limiting Dr. Laposata's scope and blocking the defense's garage interior photographs. Daniel Wolfe's testimony concluded after four rounds of examination — redirect, recross, re-redirect, and re-recross — with both sides disputing crash test arm weights and fabric impact methodology. A major disruption arose when defense attorney Alessi moved for mistrial after ADA Brennan showed Wolfe holes in O'Keefe's sweatshirt that lab documentation confirmed were criminalist cuts, not event-related damage; Brennan conceded the error and Judge Cannone issued a curative instruction. A voir dire of Dr. Elizabeth Laposata resulted in her dog bite opinions being excluded under Daubert, though her motor vehicle injury analysis was substantially preserved. Defense investigator John Tedman documented measurements of the entrances and distances at 34 Fairview Road. Dr. Elizabeth Laposata then began her direct examination, describing O'Keefe's head injuries as a coup-contrecoup pattern from a backward fall onto a surface with small ridges or granularity; she separately described the eyelid laceration as reflecting an application of force and said a small object or fist was possible.

  • ADA Brennan's recross of Daniel Wolfe showed sweatshirt holes as potential evidence, but defense counsel produced lab documents proving the holes were criminalist cuts; Brennan conceded the error and the judge issued a curative instruction after the defense moved for mistrial.
  • Judge Cannone excluded Dr. Laposata's dog bite opinions under Daubert, citing insufficient specific methodology and training, while allowing her to testify on O'Keefe's injury patterns as inconsistent with vehicle impact.
  • Dr. Elizabeth Laposata testified that O'Keefe's head injuries showed a coup-contrecoup pattern consistent with a backward fall onto a surface with small ridges or granularity.
  • Dr. Laposata identified a separate laceration on O'Keefe's right upper eyelid consistent with direct application of force from an object — or a fist.
  • On re-redirect, Wolfe testified that Dr. Welcher used the same 50th-percentile Hybrid III model in a different drop test; Wolfe had earlier described Welcher as adjusting head mass in the force calculation.
Robert Alessi
“Those holes in the back of the hoodie sweatshirt are clearly, unequivocally, without doubt, caused — nothing to do with any type of event on or about January 29th, 2022.”
The centerpiece of the defense mistrial motion — Alessi establishing that the holes Brennan implied were collision-related were unequivocally lab cuts, framing the incident as deliberate misconduct on the trial's central issue.
Elizabeth Laposata
“A fist is an object.”
The most explosive line of Laposata's direct — she described the right eyelid laceration as reflecting an application of force and said a small object or fist was possible.
Daniel Wolfe
“A Hybrid III, 50th percentile male. The same that we used in our testing.”
Wolfe stated that Dr. Welcher used the same Hybrid III model in a drop test; that testimony did not resolve the disputed suitability of Wolfe's arm and fabric tests.
Video thumbnail for Day 29 — Wolfe (redirect cont), Tedman, Laposata 7h 18m
Watch →

1. Daniel Wolfe — Re-redirect/Re-recross

Final examination rounds for defense expert Wolfe on tail light impact physics, followed by a procedural motion regarding sweatshirt evidence.

Redirect
Daniel Wolfe Alan Jackson
69 lines
Recross
Daniel Wolfe Hank Brennan
28 lines
Procedural
Procedural - Motions (Sweatshirt holes)
112 lines

Defense attorney Alessi moved for a mistrial with prejudice, arguing that prosecutor Brennan committed intentional misconduct by showing Dr. Wolfe holes in the back of John O'Keefe's hoodie sweatshirt during cross-examination and implying they were caused by the events of January 29, 2022. Alessi presented crime lab documentation showing the holes were actually cuts made by criminalist Maureen Hartnett during her inspection and sampling of the sweatshirt in May 2022 and May 2023. Alessi argued the Commonwealth deliberately withheld these lab documents from evidence to enable the misleading demonstration. Brennan conceded he made a mistake and proposed a curative instruction. Judge Cannone denied the mistrial motion, admitted the lab documentation into evidence, and instructed the jury that the holes were made by the criminalist during her inspection on May 18, 2023, with Alessi holding up the back of the sweatshirt for the jury to see.

3. Procedural — Motions

Pre-testimony motions hearing addressing Commonwealth rebuttal witnesses, scope of Dr. Elizabeth Laposata's expert testimony on dog bites and pattern injuries, and admissibility of defense photographs of the 34 Fairview Road garage.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
96 lines

Judge Cannone ruled on several motions before the jury entered. The Commonwealth's motion to call rebuttal witnesses was allowed, with Brennan confirming Dr. Crosby would not be called if Elizabeth Laposata is precluded from testifying about dog bites. The court went through Elizabeth Laposata's report page by page, excluding her opinions that O'Keefe's body was moved, her critique of the medical examiner's hypothermia diagnosis, and portions characterized as accident reconstruction rather than medical examination. The judge ordered a voir dire of Elizabeth Laposata on her dog bite qualifications before she could testify on that topic. Jackson and Brennan then argued extensively over defense photographs of the garage at 34 Fairview Road, with Jackson arguing the photos supported the defense theory that O'Keefe entered the house and Brennan calling the theory speculative. The judge allowed measurements but ruled the garage photos would be marked for identification only, not admitted into evidence.

6. Elizabeth Laposata — Voir Dire

Voir dire examination of defense expert Dr. Elizabeth Laposata on her forensic pathology qualifications, followed by Judge Cannone's partial exclusion ruling.

Voir Dire
Elizabeth Laposata Alan Jackson
239 lines
Procedural
Procedural - VD Ruling (Laposata)
21 lines

After completing a voir dire examination of Dr. Laposata, Judge Cannone issued detailed rulings on what the defense expert could and could not testify about. The judge excluded all testimony on dog bite wounds, finding Laposata unqualified under Daubert and distinguishing her from Dr. Russell, who had ER experience and published research. On motor vehicle strike opinions, the judge conducted a line-by-line review of Laposata's report, allowing testimony within her medical examiner expertise (absence of bruising, skin injury patterns) while excluding biomechanical analysis (speed, force, taillight materials). Jackson objected on the record, arguing the Commonwealth sandbagged the defense by waiting until June 5 to raise objections that were due by March 7. The judge noted the ruling was based on foundational requirements, not timing, and directed the parties to address report photographs the following day.

8. Procedural - Motions

The court resolved which Laposata report photographs could be shown, reviewed the expected final defense witness and rebuttal plans, and addressed objections to Dr. Rentschler's slides.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
86 lines

Judge Cannone worked through Dr. Laposata's report photographs page by page, excluding dog bite images and inflammatory photos while admitting Lucas compression device images and photos already in evidence. The court confirmed Dr. Rentschler would likely be the defense's final witness, with Jackson estimating two to three hours of direct examination. Brennan outlined Commonwealth rebuttal plans including Dr. Welcher and DNA witnesses, estimating two to three hours total, and confirmed he would not call Dr. Gillespie or Dr. Crosby. Brennan also previewed objections to Dr. Rentschler's PowerPoint slides, citing improper issue framing, credibility determinations about Dr. Welcher, and opinion summaries. Jackson indicated the defense would return with a proposed revision to the curative instruction regarding the sweatshirt holes incident.

◀ Day 28 Trial 2 Day 30 ▶