Trial 1 Trial Day
◀ Day 8 Trial 1 Day 10 ▶

Day 9 - May 10, 2024

Albert Family Testimony Covers Waterfall And 34 Fairview

11Proceedings
7Pages
3Witnesses
3,207Lines
13 sidebars
Day 9 of 35
Appearing:

Julie and Nicole Albert testified about the Waterfall and 34 Fairview Road, and Brian Albert began his testimony.

Full day summary

Julie Albert completed her testimony after questioning about her calls, a Waterfall video, and her observations of Karen Read and John O’Keefe. Nicole Albert then described the Waterfall gathering, the people at 34 Fairview Road, police arriving the following morning, and photographs and a graphic of the property admitted into evidence. On cross-examination, she acknowledged family discussions about the case before law-enforcement interviews and maintained that she had not answered Jennifer McCabe’s morning calls. Brian Albert began his testimony about the gatherings, the Waterfall video, and his account that neither O’Keefe nor Read entered his home. Outside the jury’s presence, the court held a sealed hearing concerning Aidan Kearney.

Julie Albert Cross-Examination: Calls, Timeline, and Waterfall Observations

Defense played Exhibit 53. Albert identified the person shown as her husband and agreed the screen showed him leaving the Waterfall at about 12:13:46 a.m.; she said her earlier 12:10 a.m. estimate was made without the video.

View moment →

Nicole Albert recounts Waterfall gathering, return home, and morning police contact

Albert testified about the people who gathered at 34 Fairview Road and gave her approximate order of departure, placing Caitlin's departure closest to 2:00 a.m.

View moment →

Nicole Albert Cross-Examination

Albert acknowledged that she and her family discussed the case before law-enforcement interviews and agreed that she did not mention Colin Albert to Trooper Proctor or Sergeant Lank, explaining that she did not consider him part of the group after the Waterfall.

View moment →

Brian Albert — Direct Examination

Albert testified that he did not become aware of John O’Keefe or Karen Read coming to the house and that neither entered it.

View moment →

Brian Albert — Direct Examination

The Commonwealth played portions of the Waterfall video marked as Exhibit 53. Albert said the video fairly portrayed the interior, but gave qualified identifications because the image was grainy.

View moment →
Nicole Albert
“Of course we discussed the case, just everything that was going on. We were trying to figure out what happened.”
Albert acknowledged family discussions before law-enforcement interviews.
Brian Albert
“John O’Keefe and Karen Read never entered my house.”
Albert gave a clear account of whether either person came inside 34 Fairview Road.
Video thumbnail for Day 9 — Julie Albert (cross), Nicole Albert, Brian Albert 7h 3m
Watch →

1. Julie Albert — Cross (Part 2)

Julie Albert’s cross-examination focused on contacts around Karen Read’s arrest, Waterfall video timing, and Albert’s observations that Read did not appear impaired or argue with John O’Keefe.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
17 lines
sidebar
Sidebar Addresses Grand-Jury References, Security, Schedule, and Kearney Motion
62 lines

Counsel and the judge agreed on a neutral way to identify prior grand-jury testimony while clarifying that neither side in this case participated in that proceeding. Court security reported that a court user would be barred from Norfolk Superior Court for the remainder of the trial, and the defense declined an offer for an officer to accompany Karen Read outside the courtroom. The judge adjusted the Memorial Day week schedule and set a hearing after the current witness on the Commonwealth's motion to exclude Aidan Kearney during certain witnesses' testimony.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions (Resumed)
12 lines
Cross
Julie Albert David Yannetti
691 lines

On continued cross-examination, Julie Albert was questioned about 67 calls with Courtney Proctor and other contacts around Karen Read's arrest and arraignment; she said she did not remember the subjects of several conversations, while agreeing the arraignment could have been discussed. Defense counsel played Exhibit 53; Albert identified the person shown as her husband and agreed the screen showed him leaving the Waterfall at about 12:13:46 a.m., adding that her earlier 12:10 a.m. estimate had been made without the video. She also testified that Read did not appear impaired and that she had not seen Read and John O’Keefe arguing during the time she observed them at the Waterfall.

2. Julie Albert — Redirect

Julie Albert's redirect addressed her calls with Ms. Proctor, cooperation with investigators, and walking in cold weather on January 29.

Redirect
Julie Albert Adam Lally
46 lines

Julie Albert agreed that her calls with Ms. Proctor were less frequent than her calls with other friends and said she did not recall discussing the case with Ms. Proctor or Trooper Proctor outside her interview. She said she voluntarily attended interviews with other troopers, answered questions, and provided her phone. She also described walking faster in cold weather and not expecting to remain outside talking on January 29.

sidebar
Recross Text Message Scope
32 lines

The defense sought permission to ask about text messages with Courtney Proctor on recross, and the judge sustained the Commonwealth's scope objection while also instructing counsel to avoid repetitive witness identification.

3. Procedural — Aidan Kearney

Before the jury entered, the court held a sealed ancillary hearing concerning a Commonwealth motion involving Mr. Kearney, then resumed with Nicole Albert called as the next witness.

sidebar
Sidebar on Commonwealth Motion Concerning Mr. Kearney
68 lines

The court addressed the Commonwealth's motion concerning Mr. Kearney, described as seeking to exclude him from proceedings involving certain witnesses. Mr. Bradl said he had not received the motion and was appearing for Mr. Curry, not Mr. Kearney. The judge directed that he receive a copy and time to consult with Mr. Kearney before a hearing expected within 15 to 20 minutes. At defense counsel's request, the court excused the parties in the Read matter from the ancillary hearing and stated that the hearing would be sealed.

Procedural
Separate-Cover Hearing and Transition to Nicole Albert
8 lines

With the defendant present and the jury absent, the court held a hearing under separate cover involving Attorneys Lally, McLaughlin, and Bradl. After a recess, the jury returned and the Commonwealth called Nicole Albert as its next witness.

4. Nicole Albert — Direct

Nicole Albert testified about the Waterfall gathering, the later gathering at 34 Fairview Road, and events at her home the next morning.

Direct
Nicole Albert Adam Lally
606 lines

Nicole Albert described plans surrounding her son’s birthday, the Waterfall gathering on January 28, 2022, and the people who later gathered at 34 Fairview Road. She testified that neither John O’Keefe nor Karen Read entered her home, described Jennifer McCabe coming to her bedroom the next morning and police arriving at the house, and identified eight exterior photographs that were admitted as Exhibits 58 through 65.

2 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Hearsay and Next Events The parties discussed a hearsay objection to testimony about being told police wanted to speak with the witness, and the judge directed counsel to ask what happened next.
  2. Conversation Testimony Limits The parties disputed whether questions about the witness's conversation were hearsay, and the judge limited examination to the witness's actions rather than conversation specifics.

5. Nicole Albert — Cross

Defense counsel continued cross-examining Nicole Albert about the Waterfall video, 34 Fairview, prior accounts, and a disputed phone call with Jennifer McCabe.

Cross
Nicole Albert Elizabeth Little
701 lines

Defense counsel questioned Nicole Albert about the Waterfall video, Brian Albert's training, the timing and occupants of 34 Fairview, Chloe's history, and prior accounts to police and the grand jury. Albert acknowledged discussing the case with family before interviews and not naming Colin Albert to Trooper Proctor or Sergeant Lank, while explaining that she did not view him as part of the later group. After reviewing a Cellebrite-records page marked for identification, she continued to deny answering or speaking with Jennifer McCabe by phone that morning. A stipulated graphic representation of 34 Fairview was admitted as Exhibit 66.

6 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Fighting Training Questions The parties discussed questions about the witness's husband's boxing and fighting experience, and the judge permitted two questions framed around general training and experience.
  2. Grand Jury Testimony Source The defense sought to clarify how it received Federal Grand Jury testimony, and the judge barred further questioning on whether the Commonwealth had provided it.
  3. Police Report Memory Refresh The Commonwealth objected to describing a police officer's report as the witness's statement while it was being used to refresh recollection, and defense counsel said she would not do so again.
  4. Scale Model as Chalk The defense sought to use a scale replica of 34 Fairview to assist the jury, and the judge approved its use as a chalk if the witness adopted it.
  5. Cellebrite Call Report Use The parties discussed using a Cellebrite report to refresh recollection about calls, and the judge limited the inquiry to unanswered calls and directed that the report be marked for identification.
  6. Graphic Rendering Stipulation The parties discussed admitting Exhibit XX, described as a graphic rendering rather than a photograph, and the judge required them to state that stipulation before admission.

6. Nicole Albert — Redirect/Recross

Nicole Albert completed redirect and recross examination, denying a phone conversation with Jennifer McCabe before McCabe entered her room on January 29 and answering further questions about Chloe's whereabouts and rehoming.

Redirect
Nicole Albert Adam Lally
39 lines

Nicole Albert denied answering or speaking with Jennifer McCabe by phone before McCabe came into her room on the morning of January 29. She testified that she had no experience interpreting Cellebrite extraction reports, described rehoming Chloe after a May 2022 biting incident, and said Mr. Higgins and her husband were outside her sight for only a couple of minutes while she cleaned. The judge limited one question about later contact with Chloe's new owner to whether contact occurred, rather than its substance.

Recross
Nicole Albert Elizabeth Little
18 lines

Nicole Albert said she was not aware of receiving voicemails from Jennifer McCabe on January 29. The judge sustained objections to two defense questions about Chloe's whereabouts. In response to a later question, Albert said she believed she had provided the Commonwealth information about Chloe's whereabouts; counsel requested an approach when asked when she had done so.

sidebar
U.S. Attorney Information Inquiry
19 lines

The parties discussed questioning about information reportedly provided to the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the judge ended that line of inquiry.

7. Brian Albert — Direct

Brian Albert testified that John O’Keefe and Karen Read did not enter 34 Fairview Road, while the Commonwealth played Waterfall video and published photographs. Before the weekend recess, the judge addressed scheduling and anticipated photographic issues for Caitlin Albert’s testimony.

Direct
Brian Albert Adam Lally
831 lines

Brian Albert described traveling from New York with Brian Higgins, meeting him at the Hillside, and later joining family and friends at the Waterfall. He recounted the discussion of an invitation to his home, the gathering at 34 Fairview Road, and his testimony that John O’Keefe and Karen Read never entered the house. Albert also described Jennifer McCabe waking him early the next morning, police contacts at the house, and later interviews with state troopers. The Commonwealth played portions of Waterfall video marked as Exhibit 53 and published photographs previously marked as Exhibits 58 through 65.

sidebar
Counsel-Appearance Video Exclusion
37 lines

The court discussed trial scheduling and a proposed video showing defense counsel at the property, and the judge said the video could not be admitted because counsel appeared in it.

Procedural
Jury Schedule and Anticipated Photo Issue
20 lines

The judge excused the jury for the weekend, provided upcoming trial scheduling updates and standard cautions, and asked counsel to identify any evidentiary issues requiring weekend review. Defense counsel flagged anticipated photographs involving Caitlin Albert and Kate McLaughlin; the judge directed counsel to raise the matter before Caitlin Albert testifies and before cross-examination. The Commonwealth said Caitlin Albert would probably testify Monday.

◀ Day 8 Trial 1 Day 10 ▶