Trial 1 Trial Day
◀ Day 9 Trial 1 Day 11 ▶

Day 10 - May 13, 2024

Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 1 · 8 proceedings · 3,100 lines

Day 10 of 35
Appearing:

Brian Albert Sr.'s cross examines his qualified grand-jury answer about Karen Read, the timing of a phone upgrade and preservation notice, and a disputed 2:22 a.m. call. Brian Albert Jr. and Caitlin Albert then testify about 34 Fairview Road.

Full day summary

Day 10 centers on the Albert family, with Brian Albert Sr. facing cross-examination about his grand jury answer concerning Karen Read. Jackson read the complete answer, including Albert's qualification that he may have seen her once; Albert later agreed the first portion was false. Jackson also questioned Albert about a phone upgrade he placed in the third week of September 2022, perhaps September 22, relative to a September 23 preservation notice; Albert said he was unsure of the exact date, described an upgrade rather than destruction, and testified that some data transferred. Jackson challenged Albert's explanation for a 2:22 AM call to Brian Higgins; Albert disputed the locked-phone premise and said the phone might not have been locked and an inadvertent recent-call entry was possible. Prosecution witnesses Brian Albert Jr. and Caitlin Albert each testify that O'Keefe and Read never entered 34 Fairview Road, while cross-examination addressed the more than 18-month delay before investigators interviewed them. Little juxtaposed Brian Albert Jr.'s testimony that he could see tire tracks in the snow with his testimony that he did not see a man in the front yard. The day closes with the defense seeking admission of photographs it proffered to challenge Katie McLaughlin's account of her relationship with Caitlin Albert and argue bias; the prosecution challenged authentication, and the judge took the matter under advisement.

  • Brian Albert Sr. agrees the first portion of his grand jury answer about never having met or seen Karen Read was false, while maintaining that the answer's subsequent qualification that he may have seen her once mattered.
  • Jackson questions Albert about a phone upgrade he placed in the third week of September, perhaps September 22, relative to the September 23 preservation notice; Albert says he was unsure of the exact date and distinguishes an upgrade from destruction.
  • Little juxtaposes Brian Albert Jr.'s acknowledgement that he could see tire tracks in the snow with his testimony that he did not see a man lying in the front yard.
  • Both Brian Albert Jr. and Caitlin Albert confirm they were not interviewed by investigators until more than 18 months after the January 2022 events.
  • Defense seeks admission of photographs it proffers to challenge Katie McLaughlin's account of her relationship with Caitlin Albert and argue bias; the prosecution contests authentication, and the judge takes the matter under advisement.
Brian Albert
“That portion of that sentence is false.”
Albert agreed that the first portion of his complete grand-jury answer about never seeing Read was false; he denied lying and maintained that the answer's 'Maybe once' qualification mattered.
Alan Jackson
“So you now claim that you got rid of the phone on September 22nd, 2022, hours before you were ordered to preserve it — that's your testimony, correct?”
Jackson framed the phone-upgrade timing as September 22, shortly before a September 23 preservation notice; Albert agreed to that framing in this exchange but elsewhere said he was unsure of the exact date and described an upgrade rather than destruction.
Elizabeth Little
“But you did not see a 220-pound man lying in the snow in your front yard. Is that something that you saw?”
Little contrasted Brian Albert Jr.'s ability to see tire tracks with his answer that he did not see a man lying in the yard; the exchange concerns his observation, not what every person at the house could see.
Video thumbnail for Day 10 — Brian Albert (cross), Brian Albert Jr, Caitlin Albert 7h 24m
Watch this day Day 10 — Brian Albert (cross), Brian Albert Jr, Caitlin Albert Watch with synced transcript →

Brian Albert — Cross

After opening proceedings, Jackson cross-examined Albert about his qualified prior answer about Read, acknowledgment that its first portion was false, the phone upgrade before a preservation notice, and the disputed 2:22 AM Higgins call.

Cross
Brian Albert Alan Jackson
1892 lines

Alan Jackson cross-examined Brian Albert using prior testimony, documents, and phone records. Jackson read Albert's complete grand-jury answer about Karen Read, including the qualification that he may have seen her once; Albert said the latter sentence qualified the first and later agreed that the first portion was false. Jackson also questioned Albert about when he upgraded a phone relative to a later preservation notice. Albert placed the upgrade in the third week of September, perhaps September 22, while saying he was unsure of the exact date, that the device was upgraded rather than destroyed, and that some data transferred. Finally, Jackson challenged Albert's explanation for a 2:22 AM call to Brian Higgins by positing steps required on a locked iPhone. Albert did not accept that premise and said the phone might not have been locked and an inadvertent recent-call entry was possible.

+1 procedural segment

Brian Albert — Redirect/Recross

Redirect covers Albert's bulkhead, phone, reception, and house-entry testimony; brief recross challenges lunch-recess preparation and emphasizes that the phone was traded in the day before the preservation order.

Redirect
Brian Albert Adam Lally
143 lines

ADA Lally conducts a methodical redirect examination of Brian Albert, systematically addressing points raised during Alan Jackson's cross-examination. Lally establishes that Albert was at the Hillside and Waterfall bars with his own friends and family, not specifically with O'Keefe or Read. Albert explains he visited Jen McCabe the next afternoon because she is like a sister to him and was distraught. Lally elicits testimony about the basement bulkhead — that it had different doors than shown in cross-examination exhibits, made a loud creaking noise when opened, and that Albert said the interior door was kept locked. On the phone issue, Albert describes categories of information that could be cloud-backed: calls could be backed up, and texts, photos, and contacts could be included; he also says the call records shown were generated after the upgrade. Albert explains poor cell reception at 34 Fairview Road and suggests his phone may have been unlocked around the time of the 2:22 AM call, offering an alternative to the deliberate-call theory. The examination concludes with Albert's emphatic denial that O'Keefe entered his house that night.

Recross
Brian Albert Alan Jackson
60 lines

Alan Jackson conducts a brief recross focused on two points. First, he establishes that Brian Albert discussed poor cell phone reception at 34 Fairview Road during trial preparation with ADA Lally, presses Albert on whether the topic came up during the lunch break, and probes whether Albert's recollection of where the prep meeting occurred was refreshed during lunch contact. Albert says he recalled the location by thinking about it, concedes he spoke briefly with Lally over lunch and that Lally mentioned at least one topic he planned to raise on redirect, and denies that Lally told him how to answer. Second, Jackson returns to the phone timeline, drawing out that while a defense motion for Albert's physical phone was denied in October 2022, Albert had already traded in the phone approximately a month earlier — the day before the preservation order was issued.

Brian Albert Jr

Brian Albert Jr. described the Fairview party, guests, and an unrecognized dark SUV, and said John O'Keefe and Karen Read never entered. Cross-examination challenged his timing, interview delay, family discussions, and observations.

Direct
Brian Albert Jr Adam Lally
348 lines

Brian Albert Jr., 25, testified about his birthday celebration at 34 Fairview Road in Canton on the evening of January 28, 2022. He described friends arriving around 7:30 PM, his cousin Colin Albert (age 17) arriving around 10:45-11 PM, and his parents returning from the Waterfall Bar & Grille with Brian Higgins and his sister Caitlin around midnight. He testified that Colin got up to leave as the parents arrived and said Allie was picking him up. Albert Jr. described looking out the dining room window twice and seeing an unrecognized dark SUV parked near the mailbox, which had moved toward the flagpole area by his second look. He stated no one besides the people he named entered the house, that he heard no noises from outside, observed no injuries on his father the next morning, and that neither John O'Keefe nor Karen Read ever came inside the home.

Cross
Brian Albert Jr Elizabeth Little
196 lines

Elizabeth Little challenged Brian Albert Jr. on several fronts during cross-examination. She established that Albert Jr. was not interviewed by Massachusetts State Police until July 6, 2023 — 18 months after O'Keefe's death — and only after being called before a grand jury. The interview took place at the family's defense attorney's office. Little probed his communications with cousin Colin Albert via Snapchat, establishing a cousin group chat existed but that no messages from January 28th were preserved. She used prior grand jury testimony to examine Albert Jr.'s uncertainty about Brian Higgins's presence and departure time, and whether his father was present when he looked out the window. Albert Jr. estimated that he had had hundreds of conversations with family members, distinguished discussions of the events from discussions of harassment, and said he continued speaking with them after the interview. The cross concluded with Little juxtaposing Albert Jr.'s statement that he could see tire tracks in the snow from the window with his statement that he did not see a man lying in the front yard.

Caitlin Albert — Direct/Cross

Albert recounts the Waterfall-to-34 Fairview gathering, testifying O'Keefe and Read never entered the house. Cross-examination addresses the delayed interview and limits on her view of the basement doorway and Colin's movements.

Direct
Caitlin Albert Adam Lally
255 lines

Caitlin Albert, age ~27, testifies as a prosecution witness about the evening of January 28, 2022 — her brother Brian Jr.'s birthday. She describes arriving at the Waterfall bar around 6 PM with her boyfriend Tristin Morris and her mother Nicole, later joined by her father Brian Albert and Brian Higgins (arriving from a funeral in New York), her uncle Chris Albert, and her aunt and uncle Jen and Matt McCabe. John O'Keefe and Karen Read arrived at some point; Albert had never met either of them before. The group left the Waterfall around midnight and went to 34 Fairview Road, where Brian Jr. was celebrating with friends Sarah Levinson and Julie Nagel. Albert testifies that neither O'Keefe nor Read ever entered the house, that the mood was positive throughout, and that she was the last non-resident to leave, picked up by Morris roughly an hour and 45 minutes after arriving. She did not look toward the front lawn when departing.

Cross
Caitlin Albert Alan Jackson
163 lines

Alan Jackson's cross-examination of Caitlin Albert focuses on two main areas. First, he establishes that no investigator contacted Albert until August 2023 — over 18 months after the January 2022 events — and that her first testimony was at a separate proceeding in May 2023 where neither the prosecution nor defense in this case was present. Second, Jackson questions Albert about her movements inside 34 Fairview Road, establishing that after briefly greeting her cousin Colin Albert in the foyer, she moved to the kitchen/dining room area and did not monitor where Colin went, could not see the basement door from her position, and never saw Colin leave the house. The proceeding is cut short at the end of the court day and continues the following day.

Procedural - Motions

Defense seeks to use contested social-media photos to impeach Katie McLaughlin over her relationship with Caitlin Albert and evolving account of Read's statements; Lally disputes authentication and argues consistency. Ruling reserved.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
23 lines

Defense attorney Yannetti argues that Katie McLaughlin minimized her relationship with Caitlin Albert during testimony and that photographic evidence from social media — including photos together in Maine, at a June 2021 baby shower, and intimate group photos — contradicts McLaughlin's claims of a distant acquaintanceship. Yannetti contends this goes to bias, as McLaughlin's account of Karen Read's statements evolved after she learned 34 Fairview was the Albert family home. ADA Lally opposes, questioning the authentication of the photos and arguing McLaughlin's statements were consistent across her report to Trooper Proctor, grand jury testimony, and trial testimony. Judge Cannone takes the matter under advisement, indicating she will rule before the next session.

◀ Day 9 Trial 1 Day 11 ▶