Trial 1 Trial Day
◀ Day 10 Trial 1 Day 12 ▶

Day 11 - May 14, 2024

Caitlin Albert, Tristin Morris, And Julie Nagel Testify

13Proceedings
6Pages
4Witnesses
3,052Lines
7 sidebars
Day 11 of 35
Appearing:

Caitlin Albert, Tristin Morris, Sarah Levinson, and Julie Nagel testified about the gathering, departures, and observations near 34 Fairview Road.

Full day summary

Caitlin Albert completed her testimony, Tristin Morris testified about picking her up from 34 Fairview Road, and Sarah Levinson described the gathering and her departure. Each witness addressed what they observed while leaving, with Albert, Morris, and Levinson qualifying the extent of their attention to the front lawn. Julie Nagel then testified that she saw a black SUV from inside the house and later noticed an unidentified dark object near the flagpole while leaving in the McCabes' vehicle. On cross-examination, Nagel said she had been intoxicated, did not know what the object was, and described the SUV as moving forward and stopping near the flagpole; her examination was recessed to continue the next day. The court also addressed objections, limits on cumulative relationship questioning, and communications with a witness who remained under oath.

Caitlin Albert - Cross

Albert testified that she did not see unusual items or a person on the front lawn when she left, while qualifying that she was not looking out the vehicle window as she drove away.

View moment →

Tristin Morris Cross-Examination

Morris repeatedly declined to estimate what time he arrived at 34 Fairview Road, saying he would not make up a time; the judge directed the speakers to proceed one at a time during the exchange.

View moment →

Sarah Levinson Direct Examination

At sidebar, the judge ruled that Julie Nagel's statement would not come in through Levinson, while allowing testimony about the event without the statement itself.

View moment →

Juliana Nagel Describes Gathering, SUV, and Flagpole-Area Observation

Nagel testified that while leaving in the McCabes' vehicle, she noticed a dark object near the flagpole but could not identify it because it was dark, snowing heavily, and the observation was brief.

View moment →

Julie Nagel - Cross

Nagel said she did nothing after seeing the object, did not know what she saw, and agreed she was intoxicated when leaving.

View moment →
Caitlin Albert
“I did not, but I also was not looking.”
Albert qualified her testimony that she did not see items or a person on the lawn while leaving the property.
Tristin Morris
“I'm not going to make up a time. I don't remember.”
Morris expressly declined to supply an arrival time he could not recall.
Julie Nagel
“I mean, I don't know what I saw, but I saw an object.”
Nagel qualified her identification of the object she reported seeing on the lawn.
Video thumbnail for Day 11 — Caitlin Albert, Tristin Morris, Sarah Levinson +1 more 4h 10m
Watch →

1. Caitlin Albert — Cross/Redirect/Recross

Caitlin Albert’s testimony continued with questions about her contacts, what she observed while leaving 34 Fairview Road, and the limits of her timing estimates.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
20 lines
sidebar
Sidebar on communications with sworn witness
22 lines

Defense counsel raised concern that Brian Albert had communicated with the Commonwealth during a break while still under oath and asked the court to prevent further such contact during testimony. The Commonwealth said its communications concerned scheduling, expected duration, or a general redirect area rather than specific questions. The judge said the defense position sounded correct but would review the rules before issuing any order.

Cross
Caitlin Albert David Yannetti
518 lines

Defense counsel questioned Caitlin Albert about her continuing contact with Katie McLaughlin, using photographs to refresh her memory about shared events. The judge sustained objections to several questions, described further relationship inquiry as cumulative at sidebar, and later sustained an objection to admitting the photographs as full exhibits. Albert also described what she did and did not observe while leaving 34 Fairview Road, including that she did not see unusual items on the lawn but was not looking out the vehicle window as she drove away.

2 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Albert and McLaughlin Relationship Questions Counsel challenged limits on questioning about Caitlin Albert’s relationship with Katie McLaughlin, and the judge sustained the objection.
  2. Photograph and Katie McLaughlin Bias Counsel sought to use photographs concerning Katie McLaughlin and the witness’s college roommates; the judge allowed questioning on the photograph and directed counsel to move on.
Redirect
Caitlin Albert Adam Lally
61 lines

On redirect, Caitlin Albert described a single brief encounter with Courtney Proctor's children and said she had never met Michael Proctor before he interviewed her. She estimated that Brian Albert and Brian Higgins were out of the kitchen and dining area for at most about five minutes. Albert also said that, while leaving 34 Fairview Road in snow, she was focused on not slipping and on reaching Tristin's car rather than the front-yard area near the flagpole.

Recross
Caitlin Albert David Yannetti
17 lines

Defense counsel briefly tested Caitlin Albert's estimate of when she saw Courtney Proctor's children with Julie Albert. Albert said the two- or three-year timeframe was an estimate and that she could not say for sure.

2. Tristin Morris — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Tristin Morris testified that he picked up Caitlin Albert from 34 Fairview Road after she asked to leave because of the snow.

Direct
Tristin Morris Adam Lally
199 lines

Tristin Morris testified that he and Caitlin Albert had gone to the Waterfall Bar & Grille before he went home to rest and remain available for plowing. He said Caitlin later called and texted him, prompting him to drive her white Jeep Cherokee from Easton to 34 Fairview Road in Canton. Morris testified that he texted Caitlin when he arrived, did not enter the house, and left shortly after she got into the front passenger seat. He described her demeanor as normal and said she faced him while they spoke as he drove away.

Cross
Tristin Morris David Yannetti
346 lines

Defense counsel David Yannetti questioned Tristin Morris about his long relationship with Caitlin Albert and continued association with the Albert and McCabe families. A June 2022 photograph from Ned Devine's was marked for identification; Morris said it refreshed his memory and agreed the other people pictured were Alberts or McCabes. Morris repeatedly said he could not recall the time of his trip to 34 Fairview Road, the length of his wait, or several parking details. He said he picked up Caitlin Albert there, saw no obstruction to the lawn, and did not see the items or unusual conditions counsel asked about. Morris also said he had spoken with prosecutors by phone about appearing in court, with his attorney on the line, rather than being interviewed by state police.

Redirect
Tristin Morris Adam Lally
27 lines

Morris said Caitlin wanted to leave 34 Fairview Road because she did not want to get snowed in. He also said that, while driving past the house, he had no reason to direct his attention to the front lawn.

3. Sarah Levinson — Direct

Sara Levinson described the birthday gathering at 34 Fairview Road and her departure after midnight. The judge excluded Julie Nagel's out-of-court statement through Levinson.

Direct
Sarah Levinson Adam Lally
382 lines

Sara Levinson testified about Brian Albert, Jr.'s birthday gathering at 34 Fairview Road, including the people present before and after midnight, the group's celebratory mood, and her departure with Julie Nagel, Jennifer McCabe, and Matt McCabe. She said she did not know John O'Keefe or Karen Read and that no one else entered the house while she was there. The judge ruled that Julie Nagel's out-of-court statement could not be admitted through Levinson, though testimony about the surrounding event could continue. Levinson said that after a remark in the vehicle, she looked toward the window only after the house was behind them and could not see 34 Fairview Road or its lawn.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Hearsay Statement About Front Lawn The parties disputed hearsay testimony about a statement that drew the witness’s attention to the front lawn; the judge excluded the statement but allowed discussion of the event.

4. Sarah Levinson — Cross/Redirect

Defense counsel questioned Sarah Levinson about activity at 34 Fairview Road, her observations outside the home, and her decision not to speak with the defense team; on redirect, she clarified the limited area she viewed when leaving.

Cross
Sarah Levinson David Yannetti
375 lines

Defense counsel examined Sarah Levinson about her longstanding relationship with Brian Albert, Jr. and other members of the Albert family, as well as the activity inside 34 Fairview Road on the night in question. Levinson testified that she did not keep track of every arrival or departure and did not remember seeing several people physically leave. After reviewing a May 2023 hearing transcript, she agreed that her earlier account of seeing grass on the lawn was accurate, qualifying it as "sort of." She said she saw nothing unusual on the front lawn when she left the house, but added that she was not looking as the McCabe car drove past it. At sidebar, the judge directed counsel not to identify Attorney Little in a question about defense-team contact; Levinson then confirmed that she had decided not to speak with the defense team before this examination.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Attempted Levinson Home Interview Counsel proposed asking about an attempted interview at the Levinson home, and the judge directed counsel to omit Ms. Little and ask the witness directly.
Redirect
Sarah Levinson Adam Lally
27 lines

Levinson said she had last been in the basement at 34 Fairview in approximately 2017 and did not believe Colin Albert remained in the house while Ms. McCabe checked a charging phone. She clarified that, when leaving, she looked only at grass bordering the front walkway rather than the entire lawn. Levinson also said another state police officer was present when she spoke with Trooper Proctor, though she could not recall the officer's name, and explained that she declined to speak with defense investigators because she believed she had nothing to discuss.

5. Julie Nagel — Direct (Part 1)

Juliana Nagel described the gathering at 34 Fairview Road and an unidentified dark object she noticed near the flagpole while leaving in heavy snow.

Direct
Julie Nagel Adam Lally
473 lines

Juliana Nagel described attending Brian Albert, Jr.'s birthday gathering at 34 Fairview Road, the people she recalled being there, and a black SUV she saw from inside the house. She said that when she later left with Matt and Jennifer McCabe, she noticed an unidentified dark object near the flagpole, but said it was dark, snowing heavily, and she could not tell what it was. The judge also addressed a foundation objection and told Lally not to speak with a witness who was on the stand.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Vehicle Foundation and Witness Communication Counsel raised a foundation concern about testimony on vehicle locations; the judge said it could be addressed on cross and prohibited counsel from speaking to a witness on the stand.

6. Julie Nagel — Cross (Part 1)

Julie Nagel's cross-examination addressed her delayed interview, intoxication, recollection, an unidentified object, and a black SUV near the flagpole before her testimony recessed until the next day.

Cross
Julie Nagel David Yannetti
568 lines

Yannetti questioned Nagel about the delay before investigators interviewed her, her friendships with people at the gathering, and details she could not recall. Nagel said she had been drinking and was intoxicated when leaving, said she saw an object but did not know what it was, and described a black SUV pulling forward and stopping near the flagpole. She also testified that Jennifer McCabe requested and received screenshots of Nagel's texts with Ryan. The judge sustained several objections during the examination and recessed with Nagel to return the next day.

sidebar
Sidebar on Expert Scheduling and Witness Testimony
17 lines

The prosecutor said Ms. Kun from the UC Davis lab needed to testify the next day because she was flying out and described her as a case-in-chief witness after defense counsel mentioned her in opening. Defense counsel then asked whether the current witness had previously told the prosecutor about the length of an object; the judge said she understood the answer was given during testimony, and the prosecutor said they had not discussed it.

◀ Day 10 Trial 1 Day 12 ▶