Day 6 - April 29, 2025
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 2 · 6 proceedings · 2,575 lines
Whiffin's cross-examination extracts key concessions on phone location data and the McCabe timestamp before Jennifer McCabe takes the stand to describe finding O'Keefe's body and Karen Read's repeated question: 'Could I have hit him?'
Full day summary
Key Moments
- Alessi extracts Whiffin's admission that his BrowserState deletion theory is 'unsubstantiated' and that he has reasonable doubt about how it occurred.
- Alessi secured Whiffin's agreement that, under a direct-route hypothetical, 36 recorded steps covering 84 feet would extend beyond the 72-foot flagpole-to-door distance; Whiffin said he did not know the direction of travel.
- Brennan's live iOS 15.2.1 demonstration shows the Safari BrowserState timestamp records when a tab is first opened, not when subsequent searches are performed, directly rebutting the defense's version-mismatch argument.
- Jennifer McCabe testifies that Karen Read repeatedly asked 'Could I have hit him? Did I hit him?' during the 4:53 a.m. phone call β the prosecution's most direct evidence of a consciousness of guilt statement.
- Judge Cannone rules ARCCA experts may testify to all previously disclosed opinions despite finding repeated and deliberate discovery violations, invoking the defendant's right to a fair trial.
Notable Quotes
Ian Whiffin
“I have an idea of how it occurred, but I've not been able to replicate it. So my idea is unsubstantiated.”
On cross, Alessi challenged Whiffin about how the BrowserState deletion occurred. Whiffin said his unreplicated idea about that deletion mechanism was unsubstantiated; separately, his timing analysis placed the searches at 6:23β6:24 a.m., not 2:27 a.m.
Jennifer McCabe
“She started saying, 'Could I have hit him? Did I hit him? I don't.' And then she was just all over the place, like screaming my name, screaming so many different things.”
McCabe's account of Read's repeated 'Could I have hit him?' statements is the prosecution's central consciousness-of-guilt evidence and the most consequential moment of the day.
Beverly J. Cannone
“I understand completely the Commonwealth's argument, completely the ambush that has been set upon here. However, a defendant's right to a fair trial is paramount to everything.”
Judge Cannone's balancing ruling β acknowledging the 'ambush' of discovery violations while holding that excluding defense experts would compromise Karen Read's trial rights β defined the legal stakes heading into the defense case.
7h 9m