Procedural ARCCA Discovery Ruling and Evidentiary Hearing
4 lines
Judge Cannone recounted prior findings that the defense had deliberately violated reciprocal-discovery obligations concerning the ARCCA witnesses and stated that a further violation had occurred by opening statements. She ruled that the defense could not mention ARCCA in its opening, then began an evidentiary hearing on the Commonwealth's motion to compel discovery from the ARCCA witnesses or exclude their testimony, beginning with Dr. Wolfe.
Voir Dire Daniel Wolfe Hank Brennan
235 lines
Dr. Daniel Wolfe testified about receiving a court order to produce communications, his efforts to locate phone and carrier records, and his communications with defense counsel. Questioning also addressed discussions of ARCCA's usual contract and retention procedures, while Wolfe maintained that he was on the side of his scientific analysis rather than acting as a defense advocate.
sidebar Witness Payment Questioning Objection
11 lines
Counsel disputed whether questioning implied the defense was paying a salaried witness for time, citing May 1 billing and an invoice; the judge overruled the objection.
Voir Dire Daniel Wolfe Hank Brennan
515 lines
Brennan questioned Dr. Wolfe about billing, deleted texts, Signal communications, and his records produced in response to a court order. Wolfe said he deleted texts after the prior trial, estimated about 100 messages with Mr. Jackson, and described four to five brief Signal communications earlier that year. The court marked as Exhibit No. 1 an email Wolfe sent to Mr. Jackson the evening before his prior testimony with an attached direct-examination outline. Wolfe said he prepared the material himself to prepare for testimony, did not discuss it with Jackson, and did not know whether Jackson used it. He also acknowledged that he did not inform the court after recognizing an earlier error in his count of prior expert qualifications.
Voir Dire Daniel Wolfe Robert Alessi
303 lines
Dr. Wolfe testified that ARCCA's prior work was performed under a Department of Justice contract and that, while that contract remained active, ARCCA could not enter a separate formal agreement with the defense. He said the 2024 report's conclusions did not change, he had no substantive defense discussions about that report before his earlier testimony, and he did not know a July invoice had been sent or paid. Wolfe also described ARCCA's later retention by the defense on March 26, 2025, its expedited review and testing in response to new material, and an anticipated May 7 completion date for the remaining analysis and report.
Voir Dire Daniel Wolfe Hank Brennan
176 lines
Brennan continued questioning Dr. Wolfe about the expected May 7 completion of ARCCA’s remaining work, including whether comparable review could have been completed earlier. Wolfe said the Department of Justice had provided verbal information about prior witness testimony before his earlier testimony, including reconstruction issues and potential DNA evidence, but said he had not been informed of a sequestration order and denied that the information changed his opinion. Exhibit No. 3, Wolfe’s outline, was marked. Wolfe also acknowledged that videos, raw data, notes, and photographs from ARCCA’s prior testing had not been produced for the first trial, while maintaining that materials for the current response to Dr. Wilcher had been provided.
sidebar Rentschler Examination Scheduling
33 lines
The court discussed finishing Dr. Rentschler's examination that day, limited Brennan to five minutes, and arranged to bring Rentschler in rather than have the witness return Thursday.
Voir Dire Andrew Rentschler Hank Brennan
91 lines
Dr. Andrew Rentschler testified about communications with the defense before his earlier testimony, disputing that call records reflected 23 separate calls and describing his own records as showing three calls. He said Department of Justice personnel had updated him about trial testimony and events he had not known about, which helped him understand what was happening during trial. Over defense objection, the judge allowed questioning about sequestration; Rentschler said he had not known of the order. He also said his report was not yet complete and was estimated for May 7 or later, though he could try to expedite it if ordered.
sidebar Next-Day Argument Schedule
7 lines
The judge scheduled argument for the next day after the jury breaks around 4:00 or 3:45, limiting each side to ten to fifteen minutes.