Trial 1 Trial Day
◀ Day 6 Trial 1 Day 8 ▶

Day 7 - May 8, 2024

Waterfall Witnesses, Exhibits, and Departure Observations

21Proceedings
8Pages
7Witnesses
3,534Lines
9 sidebars
Day 7 of 35
Appearing:

Witnesses described the Waterfall gathering, admitted videos and phone records, and limited observations as Read and O’Keefe left.

Full day summary

Michael Camerano testified about January 28 messages, the group’s visit to C.F. McCarthy’s, and events at One Meadows Ave. the following morning. The court admitted text-message, garage-video, bar-surveillance, phone-call, and text-message extraction exhibits. Katie Camerano, Curt Roberts, Waterfall bartender Rebecca Trayers, Nicholas Kolokithas, and Karina Kolokithas then described their observations at the Waterfall, including the group’s demeanor, the discussion of going to 34 Fairview Road, and their limited observations of Read and O’Keefe as they left. Waterfall surveillance footage and receipts were admitted, and several witnesses testified that their knowledge of the couple’s relationship was limited to what they personally observed. The court ended early and directed jurors to return the following morning.

Michael Camerano Describes January 28 Plans, Bar Visit, and Next-Morning Return to One Meadows Ave.

After Camerano identified the messages as a January 28 exchange with John O'Keefe, the court admitted the text-message binder as Exhibit 48.

View moment →

Michael Camerano Describes January 28 Plans, Bar Visit, and Next-Morning Return to One Meadows Ave.

The court admitted garage-area footage from One Meadows Ave. as Exhibit 49; Camerano said the footage showed the vehicle movement undertaken so Karen Read could pull into the garage.

View moment →

Michael Camerano Describes January 28 Plans, Bar Visit, and Next-Morning Return to One Meadows Ave.

The court admitted C.F. McCarthy's surveillance footage as Exhibit 50, and Camerano identified himself, John O'Keefe, Curt Roberts, and Karen Read in portions of the video.

View moment →

Katie Camerano - Direct Examination

Following a sidebar over use of a phone-extraction report, Exhibit 51, a report of calls between Read and Camerano, was admitted and published to the jury.

View moment →

Rebecca Trayers — Direct Examination

Waterfall surveillance footage was admitted as Exhibit 53 and portions were played for the jury.

View moment →

Nicholas Kolokithas - Direct Examination

He described discussion of going to D&E’s or 34 Fairview Road and testified that Brian Albert invited the group back to his house.

View moment →

Karina Kolokithas Describes Waterfall Gathering and Departure

Kolokithas described leaving the Waterfall with Jennifer McCabe and Read, then seeing Read and O’Keefe together outside and walking toward a black SUV.

View moment →
Nicholas Kolokithas
“I believe it was mentioned. Brian Albert, the homeowner, had invited the group back to his house.”
He described the invitation to 34 Fairview Road as his recollection of the discussion.
Karina Kolokithas
“She was walking to the driver’s side. But, again, I was more concerned about crossing Washington Street and there was a little bit of snow at that point, so I didn’t see -- like I saw them walking in that direction, like her going to the driver’s side and John going to the other side, but I didn’t see anything after that.”
Kolokithas described the limits of her observations after seeing Read and O’Keefe approach a black SUV.
Video thumbnail for Day 7 — Rae, Camerano, Curt Roberts +4 more 7h 3m
Watch →

1. Charles Rae — Direct (Part 2)

Lieutenant Charles Rae resumed direct examination as the Commonwealth played welfare-check video from One Meadows Ave.; he described the lack of response at the home and officers' observations outside.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
22 lines
Direct
Charles Rae Adam Lally
88 lines

Lieutenant Charles Rae resumed direct examination as the Commonwealth played cruiser and Ring-camera footage from the welfare check at One Meadows Ave. Rae testified that the officers received no answer at the front door, later learned the children were staying with friends or family, and saw two vehicles but nothing beyond snow on the driveway. He identified video showing himself and Sergeant Meehan at the residence and said he looked through windows for people or activity. The court sustained a defense objection when Rae began to describe what he learned from later reviewing the cruiser video.

Cross Waived
Charles Rae - Cross Waived
8 lines

2. Michael Camerano — Direct

Michael Camerano testified about January 28 texts, a visit to C.F. McCarthy’s, and his trip to One Meadows Ave. the following morning; the court also set limits on exhibit playback.

sidebar
Sidebar on Video Exhibits and Display Procedure
32 lines

Counsel discussed planned text-chat and video exhibits, including an additional Ring video not yet marked as an exhibit. After defense counsel confirmed there was no question the video would come into evidence, the court permitted playback in short portions. The court then directed defense counsel to ask permission each time before displaying exhibits.

Direct
Michael Camerano Adam Lally
889 lines

Michael Camerano described his friendship with John O’Keefe, their January 28 text exchanges and visit to C.F. McCarthy’s, where Curt Roberts and Karen Read later joined them. The court admitted text-message, garage-video, and bar-surveillance exhibits as Camerano identified people and events shown in them. He testified that after calls the following morning, he went to One Meadows Ave. to pick up O’Keefe’s niece, found a garage door open, and attempted to close and secure it.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Why Camerano Went to Meadows The parties discussed testimony about a call from Camerano's wife and why he went to One Meadows Ave.; defense counsel stated no objection.

3. Michael Camerano — Cross

Michael Camerano described John O’Keefe and Karen Read’s recent relationship as normal, caring, and affectionate.

Cross
Michael Camerano Alan Jackson
126 lines

Camerano agreed that he and his family spent substantial time with John O’Keefe and Karen Read, including entrusting children to Read’s care. He recalled only limited complaints from O’Keefe about Read buying nice things for the children, said he did not recall O’Keefe raising a breakup, and described their interactions shortly before O’Keefe’s passing as normal, caring, and affectionate. The court sustained one objection to a broader relationship characterization before defense counsel narrowed the questions.

4. Katie Camerano — Direct/Cross

Katie Camerano recounted Karen Read’s early-morning calls and texts on January 29 while O’Keefe was being sought; related call and text records were admitted.

Direct
Katie Camerano Adam Lally
422 lines

Katie Camerano described her family’s close friendship with John O’Keefe and the children in his care. She said Karen Read called her while she was working early on January 29, repeatedly asking where Michael was because O’Keefe had not come home; Camerano also described later calls and texts while Read, Jen McCabe, and Kerry Roberts were searching. After a sidebar concerning a phone-extraction report, the court admitted and published Exhibits 51 and 52, documenting calls and text messages between Read and Camerano.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Phone-Call Extraction Recognition The parties discussed using a phone-call extraction for calls between the defendant and Katie Camerano on the 29th, including whether the witness could recognize it.
Cross
Katie Camerano David Yannetti
18 lines

Camerano confirmed that she did not communicate with Ms. Read after their early-morning January 29 text messages, had not reached out by text, and was unaware that Read's phone had been seized shortly afterward. She was then excused.

5. Curt Roberts — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Curt Roberts described the group’s normal appearance at C.F. McCarthy’s and testified that he saw no problems between Karen Read and John O’Keefe before he was excused.

Direct
Curt Roberts Adam Lally
316 lines

Curt Roberts described joining John O’Keefe, Michael Camerano, and later Karen Read at C.F. McCarthy’s on January 28, 2022. He identified people in Exhibit 50 video, said the group appeared normal and that he noticed no injuries or dishevelment in O’Keefe’s clothing before leaving around 10 p.m. Roberts also described being awakened the next morning by frantic screaming on his wife Kerry’s phone; he later learned Karen Read was calling, and Kerry left in heavy snow after saying John was missing.

Cross
Curt Roberts David Yannetti
99 lines

Roberts testified that he did not think Karen Read appeared impaired during their brief interaction at the bar and said he saw no problems between her and John O’Keefe that evening. The court allowed one final question about whether Read appeared caring toward the children, then ended that line of inquiry.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Care Toward Children Question The parties discussed whether questions about the defendant's care toward children were relationship evidence or prohibited character evidence.
Redirect
Curt Roberts Adam Lally
11 lines

Roberts confirmed that his observations of Ms. Read, Mr. O’Keefe, and the children were limited to what he personally observed and that he did not know what occurred privately in their relationship. The court then excused him.

6. Rebecca Trayers — Direct/Cross

Rebecca Trayers testified about Waterfall video, receipts, and her observations of John O'Keefe and the group at the bar.

Direct
Rebecca Trayers Adam Lally
289 lines

Rebecca Trayers, a Waterfall bartender, described the bar’s layout, closing practices, cameras, and the January 28, 2022 video shown to the jury. She recalled serving John O’Keefe a beer and said she believed he was standing with the last group near the bar. The court admitted Waterfall surveillance footage as Exhibit 53 and Waterfall receipts dated 1/28/22 as Exhibit 54.

Cross
Rebecca Trayers David Yannetti
121 lines

Defense counsel questioned Waterfall bartender Rebecca Trayers about her Canton background and professional familiarity with members of the Albert family, including Caitlin Albert and Brian Higgins. Trayers said John O’Keefe appeared in a good mood and that no one in the group seemed highly intoxicated to her. The court overruled one prosecution objection, and the Commonwealth declined redirect.

7. Nicholas Kolokithas — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross

Nicholas Kolokithas described seeing John O’Keefe and Karen Read at the Waterfall, identified portions of surveillance video, and said he observed no tension between them.

Direct
Nicholas Kolokithas Adam Lally
249 lines

Nicholas Kolokithas described attending a Canton High basketball game before going to the Waterfall, where he saw John O’Keefe and Karen Read arrive around 11:00 p.m. He said he did not observe arguments between them, could not identify the clear liquid in Read's glass, and described discussion of going to D&E’s or 34 Fairview Road. He testified that he left shortly after midnight as snow had just begun, and he identified people and locations in a portion of Waterfall surveillance video shown as Exhibit 53.

Cross
Nicholas Kolokithas Alan Jackson
318 lines

Jackson elicited testimony from Kolokithas that he had observed no tension between Ms. Read and John O’Keefe and that they appeared affectionate at the Waterfall. The court excluded testimony about future vacations as hearsay. When defense counsel played portions of Exhibit 53, Kolokithas identified people in the footage but said he did not remember apparent play fighting; the court restricted him from narrating what the video showed beyond matters on which he could assist the jury.

3 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Thirteenth Birthday Relationship Question The parties discussed whether a question about a thirteenth birthday was relevant to the witness's connection with O'Keefe and Read.
  2. Vacation Statement Hearsay The parties discussed testimony about what the witness had heard concerning O'Keefe and vacations, including whether it came directly from O'Keefe.
  3. Video Authentication and Narration Limits The parties discussed questioning the witness about a video he did not recall seeing, including authentication and limits on narrating what appeared on screen.
Redirect
Nicholas Kolokithas Adam Lally
18 lines

Kolokithas said he had not discussed John O’Keefe and Ms. Read’s personal relationship with either of them. He did not recall apparent play fighting shown in video and said he appeared to be laughing, though he was unsure what he was watching.

sidebar
Sidebar on Limited Recross Question
11 lines

Defense counsel sought to ask a limited recross question about testimony concerning Karen Read and John O'Keefe's relationship. The Commonwealth argued that its questioning addressed relationship status or problems rather than admiration; the court allowed the question, directed counsel to make it without a build-up, and ended further questioning afterward.

Recross
Nicholas Kolokithas Alan Jackson
12 lines

Kolokithas confirmed his prior testimony that Karen Read praised John for caring for the children, then was excused.

8. Karina Kolokithas — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross

Karina Kolokithas described seeing Karen Read and John O’Keefe leave the Waterfall toward Read’s SUV, then was questioned about relationship comments, Jennifer McCabe’s invitation, and the drive to 34 Fairview. The court ended Day 7 early after her testimony.

Direct
Karina Kolokithas Adam Lally
401 lines

Karina Kolokithas described joining parents at the Waterfall on January 28, 2022, where she spoke with Jennifer McCabe and Karen Read and saw no unusual interaction between Read and John O’Keefe. She said that, after leaving, she saw Read and O’Keefe walking toward what she believed was Read’s black SUV, with Read going to the driver’s side and O’Keefe to the other side; she did not see what happened afterward. The prosecution played portions of Exhibit 53, and Kolokithas identified people and the Waterfall exit area in the footage.

Cross
Karina Kolokithas Alan Jackson
46 lines

Defense counsel had Karina Kolokithas confirm her earlier account that Ms. Read spoke admiringly of Mr. O’Keefe, wished they had more time together, and was excited about a planned trip. Kolokithas also agreed that Jennifer McCabe's reported invitation was directed to Ms. Read and estimated that the drive from the Waterfall Bar to 34 Fairview would probably take five to seven minutes.

Redirect
Karina Kolokithas Adam Lally
16 lines

The prosecution clarified that Kolokithas's account of relationship-related comments at the bar came from the defendant, not from John O’Keefe. Kolokithas said O’Keefe did not share personal matters with her and that she did not know what occurred privately in the couple's home.

Recross
Karina Kolokithas Alan Jackson
8 lines

Karina Kolokithas confirmed on recross that Karen Read and John O’Keefe appeared “lovey-dovey” that night, then was excused.

sidebar
Sidebar and Early Adjournment
14 lines

The court confirmed that Christopher Albert would be the prosecution's next witness. With no objection from either side, the court ended the day early because it had been a long day for jurors, instructed them not to discuss or research the case, and directed them to return the following morning.

◀ Day 6 Trial 1 Day 8 ▶