Trial 1 Trial Day
◀ Day 4 Trial 1 Day 6 ▶

Day 5 - May 6, 2024

Gallagher and Goode Testify as Court Hears Lank Bias Issue

15Proceedings
6Pages
3Witnesses
3,478Lines
12 sidebars
Day 5 of 35
Appearing:

Gallagher and Goode testified about the Fairview Road response, scene processing, dispatch records, and early search. Outside the jury's presence, the court heard voir dire on Michael Lank and deferred a ruling on proposed evidence from a 2002 incident.

Full day summary

Lieutenant Paul Gallagher continued testimony about the response at Fairview Road, including snow removal with a leaf blower, collection of frozen blood samples in plastic cups, scene documentation, sally-port footage, and Canton Police's decision not to conduct further investigative interviews. On cross-examination, he testified that he made no contemporaneous report or notes of his January 29 scene involvement, described estimated locations for blood and glass, and answered questions about sample custody, access to the sally port, and possible cross-contamination. Sergeant Sean Goode testified about dispatching officers after calls concerning John O'Keefe, cruiser-camera footage, the early search, and conditions at the scene. His cross-examination addressed his report's conflicting Fairview Road address, the weather-limited search, and the scene's later lack of police security. After the jury was excused, the court heard voir dire concerning Sergeant Michael Lank's relationships with members of the Albert family and a 2002 incident. The judge deferred a decision on proposed evidence from that incident and requested police reports for review.

Paul Gallagher Direct Examination

Gallagher explained that officers used a leaf blower to remove snow gradually while trying to preserve biological evidence.

View moment →

Paul Gallagher — Cross-Examination

Gallagher described collecting six individual snow-and-blood samples in plastic cups obtained from Lieutenant Kelleher, then bagging and transporting them to Canton Police Headquarters.

View moment →

Sean Goode - Cross-Examination

Goode testified that after officers left, no officer remained to guard the scene and the road was no longer closed; he agreed that the scene was open to the public.

View moment →

Sean Goode - Direct Examination

Goode testified that Jennifer McCabe placed a 6:04 a.m. call from 34 Fairview, then identified the recording admitted and played as Exhibit 36.

View moment →

Witness admissibility argument concerning Sergeant Lank

The judge rejected the Commonwealth's position that the issue had no relevance, deferred a final admissibility decision, and directed counsel to provide the reports that night or before court the next morning.

View moment →
Beverly J. Cannone
“I don't know yet what I'm going to allow in but I disagree that it has nothing to do”
The judge deferred a final ruling while rejecting the Commonwealth's position that the issue was entirely irrelevant.
Video thumbnail for Day 5 — Gallagher, Goode, Lank (voir dire) 7h 28m
Watch →

1. Paul Gallagher — Direct

Before the jury entered, counsel addressed photographs, proposed exhibits, and a possible voir dire of Sergeant Lank. Lieutenant Paul Gallagher then described processing the Fairview Road scene and collecting suspected blood and a broken cocktail glass.

Procedural
Defense Raises Photograph and Discovery Issue Before Testimony
40 lines

Before the jury entered, defense counsel asked to address newly received photographs that counsel said bore on Katie McLaughlin's relationship with Caitlin Albert and on anticipated cross-examination of Caitlin Albert. Counsel also sought renewed consideration of exhibits H through K for identification. The judge identified Rule 14 and cumulative-evidence concerns, deferred the matter until later that day or the next day, and discussed scheduling a voir dire of Sergeant Lank before his expected testimony.

sidebar
Juror Answer Count
3 lines

The judge clarified for the record that 16 jurors answered the last question affirmatively.

Direct
Paul Gallagher Adam Lally
576 lines

Lieutenant Paul Gallagher described responding to Fairview Road after a report that John O'Keefe had been found in the snow. He testified about photographing and processing the area in severe weather, using a leaf blower to expose suspected blood and a broken cocktail glass, and collecting six frozen blood samples. The Commonwealth admitted scene photographs and videos, including Canton Police sally-port footage in which Gallagher identified officers working around a vehicle's rear passenger-side taillight. The court sustained objections that limited unsolicited video narration and proposed testimony about what Chief Berkowitz had said he saw.

6 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Exhibit Publication and Recording Outage Counsel discussed publishing exhibits to the jury before marking them, without objection, while the clerk reported that the FTR recording system was not recording.
  2. Exhibit Identification for Record The judge addressed concern that exhibit references could confuse the record and instructed counsel to identify which exhibits the court reporter needed to put up.
  3. Video Disk and Duplicate Exhibit Counsel discussed marking a disk containing video footage and an apparent duplicate exhibit number for a photograph, which the judge directed them to sort out during a break.
  4. Procedural
  5. Photograph Renumbered Exhibit 20A The court resolved duplicate use of Exhibit 20 by directing that the photograph already referenced to jurors be marked as Exhibit 20A.
  6. Hearsay Limits on Officer Testimony The judge and counsel discussed a hearsay objection and foundation for testimony about the recovery of items, limiting the questioning to the link from Berkowitz to Lank.

2. Paul Gallagher — Cross

Defense counsel questioned Lieutenant Paul Gallagher about early-scene documentation, blood-sample handling, access to the sally port and SUV, and possible cross-contamination; photographs were admitted as Exhibits 37 through 40.

Cross
Paul Gallagher Alan Jackson
610 lines

Defense counsel questioned Lieutenant Paul Gallagher about the early investigation at Fairview Road. Gallagher testified that he had no contemporaneous notes or report of his January 29 scene involvement and had not been formally interviewed about the case until about a month before trial. He said the locations of blood and glass were estimates because cross-coordinate mapping was not used, although he explained that lifesaving measures come first. Gallagher described collecting six individual snow-and-blood samples in plastic cups obtained from Lieutenant Kelleher, bagging them, and transporting them to Canton Police Headquarters. He also testified that Canton Police stopped further investigative interviews because a Boston police officer was found on another Boston officer's property and the homeowner was related to a member of Canton Police's investigative unit.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Cross-Examination on Lank Knowledge The court considered whether the witness could be asked about what Lank had done before the witness arrived and allowed the previously asked question.
sidebar
Ten-Minute Counsel Interval
5 lines

The judge advised counsel that the process would take about 10 minutes because it required going through another courtroom.

Cross
Paul Gallagher
378 lines

Defense counsel questioned Lieutenant Paul Gallagher about the custody of blood samples collected in Solo cups, including his lack of personal observation of their placement into evidence. Gallagher testified that only Jen McCabe was interviewed in the house and that the interview was not recorded, and he estimated that about 45 department members could access the sally port and SUV. He said Canton Police could assist with non-interview tasks despite an appearance of conflict, including facilitating taillight removal. Four photographs were admitted as Exhibits 37 through 40, showing a Stop & Shop bag and plastic cups containing blood; Gallagher agreed the described placement of unsealed blood near the SUV could create cross-contamination.

3. Paul Gallagher — Redirect/Recross

Lieutenant Paul Gallagher completed his testimony, addressing investigative responsibility, evidence handling, and the absence of probable cause for a search warrant.

Redirect
Paul Gallagher Adam Lally
24 lines

Gallagher explained that Canton Police avoided investigative interviews because investigator Kevin Albert was the property owner's brother, while State Police took jurisdiction over the unattended-death investigation. He also addressed the drinking glass, taillight removal, and transfer of blood samples to a criminalist, saying he was not concerned about cross-contamination.

Recross
Paul Gallagher Alan Jackson
27 lines

On recross, defense counsel asked Lieutenant Paul Gallagher whether investigators should pursue further inquiry after a witness identifies where a body was found. Gallagher agreed that further investigation and questions may be appropriate, said search warrants are sought when probable cause exists, and stated there was no probable cause here.

sidebar
Lank Voir Dire Scheduling
19 lines

The court discussed the expected length of upcoming witnesses and a possible plan to send the jury home early, conduct Lank's voir dire that day, and have Lank testify the next day.

4. Sean Goode — Direct

Sergeant Sean Goode described the early-morning police response at 34 Fairview Road, including the admitted 911 calls, the scene response, and later efforts to secure the area and locate evidence in the snow.

Direct
Sean Goode Adam Lally
201 lines

Sergeant Sean Goode described his overnight Canton Police dispatch duties, the worsening snow, and seeing Brian Higgins at the police station earlier that night. He testified that Kerry Roberts called before 5:00 a.m. about a man who had not come home, and that Jennifer McCabe called from 34 Fairview at 6:04 a.m. Goode said he dispatched officers, responded to Fairview, and notified Lieutenant Gallagher and Detective Sergeant Lank. The court admitted and played the Roberts and McCabe 911 calls as Exhibits 35 and 36; a flash drive from cruiser 682 was marked as Exhibit 41 before lunch.

Procedural
Witness Scheduling and Recess
16 lines

The court planned to finish Sergeant Goode's testimony and then hear Lieutenant Rae, with Sergeant Lank retained as a possible witness. The judge authorized the release of other civilian witnesses, recessed for lunch, and resumed the afternoon session with Sergeant Goode still under oath.

Direct
Sean Goode Adam Lally
337 lines

Goode identified cruiser-camera footage from his arrival at 34 Fairview Road and described the weather, the people he encountered, and the early response. He testified that Read appeared confused, hysterical, and in shock, and that he ended questioning after she said she did not remember whether she had driven there. Goode also described receiving secondhand information through dispatch that Read's father reported suicidal threats, followed by a Section 12 transport for mental evaluation. He recounted officers sealing the area where O'Keefe had been found, clearing snow with a leaf blower, and observing blood and a broken drinking glass. The court struck part of one answer concerning McCabe and Roberts' account and sustained another defense objection during testimony about the Alberts' reactions.

5. Sean Goode — Cross (Part 1)

Defense counsel cross-examined Sergeant Sean Goode about the response at 34 Fairview, report-address discrepancy, search conditions, scene security, and dash-camera footage admitted as Exhibit 16.

Cross
Sean Goode David Yannetti
876 lines

Defense counsel questioned Sergeant Sean Goode about his connections to Canton officers and members of the Albert family, the Canton Police response at 34 Fairview, and Brian Higgins's early-morning presence at the police station. Goode acknowledged that his report's face sheet listed 32 Fairview while the narrative listed 34 Fairview, and he described the weather-limited search, the absence of certain items recovered that morning, and the measures used to secure the scene. The court admitted synchronized Officer Saraf and Officer Goode dash-camera footage as Exhibit 16.

2 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Reconstruction Report Authorship The court discussed a report authored by Trooper Paul and whether Sergeant Goode had adopted it, after which counsel said he would ask a few more questions and move on.
  2. Combined Dash-Cam Video Admission The court discussed labels and synchronization added to a combined Officer Saraf and Officer Goode dash-cam video before admitting it as Exhibit 16.

6. Michael Lank — Voir Dire

After the jury was excused for Day 5, the court heard voir dire of Michael Lank and deferred until the next morning a ruling on proposed bias questioning tied to a 2002 incident.

sidebar
Police Report and Photo Use
35 lines

The court addressed use of a police report and photo during cross-examination, directed that the photo be shown to the witness, and ended the examination for the day.

Procedural
Sidebar, Exhibit Identification, and Michael Lank Voir Dire
13 lines

The court marked the first pages of incident reports dated January 30 and October 25, 2022, as Exhibits P and Q for identification. The jury was excused for the day, and the court allotted ten minutes per side before hearing argument during voir dire of Michael Lank.

Voir Dire
Michael Lank Alan Jackson
182 lines

Defense counsel questioned Michael Lank in voir dire about his childhood friendship with Chris Albert, more limited relationship with Brian Albert, and a 2002 altercation involving Chris Albert and the LoPilato brothers. Lank described Chris seeking his advice before a group approached, acknowledged a later fight with Mark LoPilato, and denied that his actions were motivated by friendship with Chris.

Voir Dire
Michael Lank Adam Lally
48 lines

On prosecution voir dire, Michael Lank said he had participated in a 2012 investigation that resulted in charges against Tim Albert and that Officer Goode worked on that investigation. Lank described his relationship with Brian Albert as civil and limited to occasional greetings at events, acknowledged past disagreements, and said his interactions with the Albert family did not change how he conducted the January 29, 2022 investigation.

Voir Dire
Michael Lank Alan Jackson
55 lines

Defense counsel continued voir dire of Michael Lank about a prior investigation involving Tim Albert. Lank said he located Albert's heavily damaged vehicle at 34 Fairview, disputed parts of counsel's characterization of the collision, and said he did not administer a Breathalyzer or request a blood test; he could not recall whether Officer Goode conducted field sobriety tests.

Procedural
Witness admissibility argument concerning Sergeant Lank
33 lines

Defense counsel argued that a 2002 incident involving Chris Albert could support questioning Sergeant Lank about possible bias and proposed calling one LoPilato brother and using police-report dates. The Commonwealth argued that the matter was irrelevant and risked confusing the jury with a collateral trial. The judge said some evidence could be admissible but was concerned about a mini-trial, requested the police reports, and deferred a final decision until the next morning.

◀ Day 4 Trial 1 Day 6 ▶