Day 21 - June 6, 2024
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 1 · 2 proceedings · 969 lines
Sergeant Bukhenik completes direct and faces cross-examination about evidence handling, scene security, missing Ring footage, and a sallyport video shown in inverted form.
Full day summary
Key Moments
- Bukhenik testified that bar surveillance showed Karen Read consuming nine drinks across two venues on the night in question.
- Bukhenik testified that two Ring doorbell videos were absent from the Ring return: one of Read arriving home after midnight and one of Read showing McCabe and Roberts the taillight damage; he said follow-up produced nothing for those videos or time frames.
- Bukhenik acknowledged he did not secure 34 Fairview Road as a crime scene despite suspecting assault by 10:41 a.m. on January 29th.
- Jackson questioned evidence handling after Bukhenik testified, to the best of his knowledge and if the label-maker date was correct, that O'Keefe's clothing had been drying on butcher paper for six days; Bukhenik said he had not known whether plastic evidence had been unbooked until March 14th or whether a separate custody log existed.
- Jackson established that the sallyport video shown during direct examination was mirrored and inverted; Bukhenik said neither he nor Lally had identified the inversion during the prior day's questioning.
Notable Quotes
Alan Jackson
“And yesterday, during the entirety of your questioning by Mr. Lally, not once did you mention that this video is actually completely inverted?”
Jackson's question established that the sallyport video shown during direct examination was inverted and that the inversion had not been identified during the prior day's questioning.
Yuri Bukhenik
“First portion — we did not secure the home as a crime scene. And the second portion — yes, I do know how to do that.”
Bukhenik agreed he knew how to secure a crime scene and that 34 Fairview was not secured; Jackson used the answer to question investigators' treatment of the house.
Yuri Bukhenik
“The data returned had video that would have been captured from the defendant arriving home after midnight on the 29th, after she dropped Mr. O'Keefe off at 34 Fairview Road. That video was not present in the data that was returned from Ring.”
Bukhenik testified that two described videos were absent from the Ring return and that follow-up produced nothing for those videos or time frames; the parties disputed the significance of the omissions.
3h 3m