Trial 2 Trial Day
◀ Day 2 Trial 2 Day 4 ▶

Day 3 - April 24, 2025

Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 2 · 9 proceedings · 919 lines

Day 3 of 36
Appearing:

Defense impeaches paramedic Whitley's evolving account of Read's hospital statements, while phone records and surveillance footage establish the digital record of O'Keefe's final evening.

Full day summary

Day 3 opened with a procedural motion on expert witness sequestration before turning to Yannetti's cross-examination of paramedic Daniel Whitley, which formed the day's centerpiece. Yannetti methodically demonstrated that Whitley's most damaging details — Read saying 'many hours' in the snow — first appeared in 2024 testimony, not his 2022 grand jury account, and that Read's statement was a distressed question rather than a guilty declaration. The prosecution then called two bar managers to authenticate surveillance footage from C.F. McCarthy's and the Waterfall, both admitted without defense objection. Close friend Michael Camerano provided emotional testimony about O'Keefe's last celebratory evening and the chaotic early morning discovery, with the defense on cross eliciting that the couple appeared 'normal, caring, and affectionate' throughout January 2022. The day concluded with Trooper Guarino reading a chronological string of texts between Read and O'Keefe revealing chronic relationship conflict and O'Keefe actively rejecting her calls, followed by video clips of Read acknowledging she 'shouldn't have been driving' after drinking.

  • Yannetti establishes that Whitley's 'many hours in the snow' language was absent from his 2022 grand jury testimony and appeared for the first time at trial two years later.
  • Whitley concedes under cross that Read's hospital statement was a question — 'could he survive' — not a declarative admission of knowledge.
  • Surveillance footage from C.F. McCarthy's (Exhibit 18) and the Waterfall Bar and Grill (Exhibit 22) admitted into evidence through foundation testimony from both bars' managers.
  • Michael Camerano confirmed that the couple greeted each other with a kiss and showed no visible tension at the bar; Yannetti then asked whether, during January 2022, their relationship had appeared normal, caring, and affectionate.
  • Trooper Guarino reads a string of texts showing O'Keefe describing 'weekly' arguing and actively rejecting Read's calls, then plays video clips of Read admitting she should not have been driving after five to seven drinks.
David Yannetti
“So 2022 there was no mention of many hours. 2024, now that's the first time that you mention the words many hours in your testimony regarding this case.”
The core impeachment of the day — Yannetti pinpoints exactly when a key incriminating detail entered Whitley's account, framing it as a fabrication that grew over two years rather than a memory of events.
Daniel Whitley
“She asked if he could be alive without a jacket in the snow for many hours. So again it was a question, sir.”
Whitley's own concession that Read's statement was a question — not a declaration — directly undercuts the prosecution's use of the hospital scene as evidence of consciousness of guilt.
Video Playback
“But I shouldn't have been driving. But I don't think I was driving recklessly.”
Read's recorded admission that she should not have been driving closes the day by handing the prosecution its clearest self-inculpatory statement, in her own words, about the night O'Keefe died.
Video thumbnail for Day 3 — Whitley, Demilus, Mihan, Camerano, Guarino 4h 45m
Watch this day Day 3 — Whitley, Demilus, Mihan, Camerano, Guarino Watch with synced transcript →

Daniel Whitley — Cross (Part 2)/Redirect

Pre-jury motions precede Whitley's continued cross and redirect. Yannetti highlights later-added details and the question-versus-admission distinction; Brennan explains omissions and disputes bias.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
17 lines

Judge Cannone convened counsel before the jury entered to address two matters. The defense raised the question of whether expert witnesses should be permitted to watch trial testimony in preparation for rebuttal, requesting this for both sides. ADA Brennan asked for time to consider the issue, and Judge Cannone deferred the ruling to later in the day. The court also addressed a pending ruling on a video clip from the previous day's testimony, with Judge Cannone allowing it to be played. The jury was then brought in, administered the standard daily questions, and the court recalled witness Whitley for continued examination by Yannetti.

Cross
Daniel Whitley David Yannetti
130 lines

David Yannetti cross-examined paramedic Daniel Whitley by methodically comparing his testimony across four prior sworn statements — the 2022 grand jury, the 2024 trial, and both direct and cross examination the previous day. Yannetti established that Whitley's 2022 grand jury testimony contained no mention of Read saying 'many hours' in the snow, that this phrase first appeared in his 2024 testimony, and that 'sitting outside' was introduced for the first time during direct examination the day before. Yannetti also confronted Whitley with his grand jury testimony showing he only 'believed' Read refused a urine sample, contrasting it with his more definitive testimony the prior day. Yannetti raised Read's menstruation, lack of a tampon, and privacy during urine-sample collection as an explanation for reluctance; Whitley said he was aware she was on her period and, in response to the combined proposition, said he would understand it to be true. Whitley ultimately conceded that Read's statement about surviving in the snow was always a question, not a declarative statement.

Redirect
Daniel Whitley Hank Brennan
61 lines

Hank Brennan conducted a brief redirect of paramedic Daniel Whitley, addressing the defense's prior cross-examination that highlighted small differences in Whitley's phrasing across grand jury, trial, and prior-day testimony. Brennan elicited that Whitley's grand jury testimony was far shorter than his trial testimony, that he does not memorize his prior statements, and that patient care reports only capture medical essentials — not opinions or extended conversations. Whitley confirmed he distinctly remembers Karen Read's question about surviving in the snow and his attempt to comfort her with stories of hypothermia survivors. Brennan concluded by addressing the defense's implication of bias through Whitley's connection to Kerry Roberts, with Whitley denying any conspiracy or interest in the case outcome.

Gene Demilus — Direct

Gene Demilus authenticates C.F. McCarthy's interior surveillance video for admission as Exhibit 18; the defense then waives cross-examination.

Direct
Gene Demilus Hank Brennan
68 lines

Gene Demilus testified as the general manager of C.F. McCarthy's, a restaurant and bar in Canton where she has worked for six years. She confirmed the establishment has a video surveillance system that she maintains. Demilus testified that two Massachusetts State Police detectives, including Detective Yuri Bukhenik, visited and were given access to download surveillance footage from around January 27-28, 2022. After Demilus confirmed the video was a fair and accurate depiction of the bar's interior, the surveillance footage was admitted as Exhibit 18 without objection from the defense.

+1 procedural segment

Bridget Mihan — Direct

Bridget Mihan authenticates Waterfall surveillance video from January 28, 2022; the defense waives cross-examination.

Direct
Bridget Mihan Hank Brennan
37 lines

Hank Brennan calls Bridget Mihan, co-owner of the Waterfall Bar and Grill in Canton, to establish the foundation for surveillance video evidence. Mihan confirms her establishment has interior video surveillance and that she provided footage from January 28, 2022 to the Massachusetts State Police. Brennan introduces Exhibit 22, plays a brief clip, and Mihan confirms the video depicts the interior of the Waterfall as it appeared that night, with no significant changes since. The examination is brief and purely foundational.

+1 procedural segment

Michael Camerano — Direct/Cross

Camerano recounts the January 28 celebration, bar encounter, and next morning's distress. Cross emphasized the families' closeness and the couple's affectionate appearance; redirect stressed his limited knowledge of private disputes.

Direct
Michael Camerano Hank Brennan
192 lines

Prosecution attorney Hank Brennan calls Michael Camerano, a Canton resident and close friend of John O'Keefe. Camerano describes the celebratory evening of January 28, 2022, when their daughters both received acceptance letters to Bishop Feehan. He and O'Keefe celebrated at O'Keefe's house with the girls, then went to C.F. McCarthy's bar, where they were joined by friend Curt and later by Karen Read. Camerano left around 9:30 PM after his son lost a tooth playing hockey, picked up his daughter from O'Keefe's house around 11 PM, and went home. The next morning between 5 and 6 AM, he woke to missed calls from his wife and Read, drove to O'Keefe's house in a panic, found the garage door open, and took a distraught Kaylee O'Keefe back to his house. Hours later, Paul O'Keefe called asking him to bring Kaylee home. Camerano drove back without telling Kaylee what had happened, and was met by Paul and John's father at the door.

Cross
Michael Camerano David Yannetti
141 lines

Defense attorney David Yannetti conducts a focused cross-examination of Michael Camerano, establishing the close social relationship between the Camerano and O'Keefe-Read families — weekly gatherings, vacations, and Camerano entrusting his children to Karen's care. Camerano acknowledges that the couple argued and bickered, offering O'Keefe getting upset over Read buying expensive gifts for his niece and nephew as an example. Camerano confirms that at C.F. McCarthy's bar that night, Read and O'Keefe greeted each other with a kiss, were affectionate and laughing, and showed no signs of tension. On redirect, prosecutor Brennan attempts to limit the testimony by establishing that Camerano had no knowledge of what happened between the couple behind closed doors, their text messages, or private arguments. Camerano describes a limited observation that Read at times did not want other women around O'Keefe.

Nicholas Guarino — Direct (Part 2)

Guarino authenticates Cellebrite records, then reads Jan. 28 Read-O'Keefe messages about conflict, rejected calls, children and plans for McCarthy's. Five video clips cover Read's qualified statements about drinking and driving.

Direct
Nicholas Guarino Hank Brennan
250 lines

Trooper Nicholas Guarino was recalled to authenticate and introduce multiple Cellebrite phone extraction reports into evidence, including call logs and text messages between John O'Keefe and Karen Read, O'Keefe and Jen McCabe, Read and Kerry Roberts, and Read and the Curtis family, all from January 28-29, 2022. The bulk of the proceeding consisted of Guarino reading aloud a chronological PowerPoint compilation of texts and calls between Read and O'Keefe throughout January 28th, depicting an extended argument about their relationship, parenting tensions with O'Keefe's children, and logistical planning for the evening. The messages show O'Keefe repeatedly rejecting Read's calls and telling her to stop calling, Read pressing him about whether he was still interested in the relationship, and eventual plans to meet at McCarthy's bar. The proceeding concluded with five video clips of Karen Read describing her alcohol consumption that evening, estimating five to seven drinks and acknowledging she was 'fuzzier' than she would have been sober but maintaining she was not driving recklessly.

Procedural — Motions

After ending testimony early, Judge Cannone covered the next day's site view, then deferred the unresolved expert-sequestration issue involving Dr. Fowler and requested advance witness lists.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
18 lines

Judge Cannone informed the jury that a witness scheduling confusion ended testimony for the day, assuring them it would not affect the overall trial schedule. She reminded jurors about the next day's site view, instructing them to wear comfortable clothes for walking and bus transportation. After the jury was excused, the court returned to the morning's unresolved question about whether expert witnesses should be exempt from the sequestration order to watch trial testimony. ADA Brennan indicated Dr. Fowler would testify the next day as an expert on blood serum testing procedures. Jackson agreed to address the expert sequestration issue the following morning, and Judge Cannone requested that both sides provide her with advance witness lists going forward.

◀ Day 2 Trial 2 Day 4 ▶