Trial 2 Trial Day
◀ Day 15 Trial 2 Day 17 ▶

Day 16 - May 15, 2025

Hartnett (cross cont), Scordi-Bello

9Proceedings
5Pages
2Witnesses
1,732Lines
Day 16 of 36
Appearing:

Hartnett's evidence-handling testimony and a correction request of unknown disposition close out her appearance, then Scordi-Bello faces cross-examination on documented methodology, hypothermia findings, and specific injury observations.

Full day summary

Day 16 opens with Alessi completing cross-examination of MSP forensic scientist Maureen Hartnett. She testified that O'Keefe's hoodie and t-shirt were packaged together before lab analysis and that she combined their debris because she could not attribute it to either garment. Her chain-of-custody knowledge began at laboratory delivery, and she did not know the debris's source. After Hartnett asked to correct something from the prior day's record, counsel conferred off transcript and Judge Cannone excused her; the transcript does not establish its substance or disposition. Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello then testified that the primary cause of O'Keefe's death was blunt impact injuries of head, with hypothermia contributing, and classified the manner as undetermined. On cross, Alessi questioned her documentation and hypothermia findings; she said she considered other explanations internally without physical notes and retained her opinion. She saw no lower-extremity impact site and said the right-eyelid laceration involved contact with a blunt object or surface, not falling backward and hitting one's head. On redirect, Scordi-Bello completed her grand-jury answer: in the context of a body found in snow, she believed the gastric and pancreatic hemorrhages were due to hypothermia; she also said no one later supplied new information and asked her to reconsider. On recross, she identified omeprazole on a medication list and agreed alcohol-related ulceration was possible, without testimony establishing why it was prescribed or comparing that possibility's likelihood with hypothermia. The day closes with argument on defense motions to exclude an amended Aperture report that moved an infotainment trigger from the 12:31:38-to-12:31:43 range to 12:32:16.

  • Hartnett testifies that the clothing was packaged together before lab analysis and that she combined debris because she could not attribute it to a particular garment; she did not know the debris's source.
  • Hartnett requests to correct something from the prior day's record; after a counsel conference off transcript, Judge Cannone excuses her because questions from both sides are complete, and the available transcript does not establish the correction or its disposition.
  • Scordi-Bello testifies that the manner of death was undetermined and that she generally could not identify how individual injuries occurred; she attributes death to blunt impact injuries of head with hypothermia as a contributing cause.
  • Scordi-Bello testifies that the right-eyelid laceration did not result from falling backward and hitting one's head, but involved contact with a blunt object or surface; she also says she saw no impact site in her lower-extremity examination.
  • On recross, Scordi-Bello identifies omeprazole on a medication list and agrees alcohol-related ulceration is possible; the exchange does not establish why it was prescribed or compare that possibility's likelihood with hypothermia.
Maureen Hartnett
“I wanted to correct something from the record yesterday. I wasn't sure when it was appropriate to do that.”
Hartnett's request to correct something from the prior day's record was followed by an off-record counsel conference and her excusal because questioning was complete; the available transcript does not establish the proposed correction or its disposition.
Irini Scordi-Bello
“Not from falling backwards and hitting one's head, but that area at some point came in contact with a blunt object or surface.”
Scordi-Bello testified that the eyelid laceration did not result from falling backward and hitting one's head, and described contact with a blunt object or surface without selecting a specific cause or overall mechanism.
Irini Scordi-Bello
“It's possible. Correct.”
Scordi-Bello agreed that alcohol-related ulceration was possible after identifying omeprazole on a medication list; the testimony did not establish the prescription's indication or compare the possible cause with hypothermia.
Video thumbnail for Day 16 — Hartnett (cross cont), Scordi-Bello 7h 27m
Watch →

5. Procedural — Motions

Alessi seeks exclusion of Burgess's amended clock-drift report as a Rule 14 ambush; Brennan calls it a clarification and seeks possible Aperture rebuttal after ARCCA. The judge takes exclusion under advisement.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
78 lines

Attorney Alessi raises two motions regarding prosecution experts from Aperture (Shanon Burgess and Dr. Judson Welcher). First, he argues that Burgess's May 8th amended report — shifting infotainment trigger 11622 from 12:31:38–43 to 12:32:16 — constitutes a Rule 14 discovery violation and an ambush, since the underlying clock-drift data has been available for months. He requests exclusion of the amended report. Attorney Brennan responds that the amendment was provoked by defense expert DiSogra's report and merely clarifies an existing time variance without changing any underlying data. Second, Brennan argues the Commonwealth should be allowed to recall its Aperture expert in rebuttal to address new ARCCA testing and demonstrations disclosed late by the defense. Alessi opposes rebuttal testimony as inverting the order of proof and effectively giving the prosecution a double rebuttal. Judge Cannone takes the exclusion request under advisement, asks defense to report back on continuance needs, and inquires about the defense case timeline.

◀ Day 15 Trial 2 Day 17 ▶