Day 23 - June 12, 2024
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 1 · 4 proceedings · 2,593 lines
Proctor's cross, redirect, and recross address texts, relationships, investigative choices, and alternative suspects; Lt. Brian Tully then describes the snowbank search and recovered items.
Full day summary
Key Moments
- Jackson read Proctor's February 4, 2022 text to his sister stating, 'Hopefully she kills herself,' sent while Proctor was the case officer.
- Jackson questions Proctor about using recused Canton PD officer Kevin Albert to coordinate witness interviews and about Courtney Proctor's contacts with Julie Albert; Proctor denies using his sister as an intermediary.
- Jackson contrasted Proctor's 'Get Elizabeth one' text with his statement that he had not asked for or received a gift; on redirect, Proctor said he had not taken the offer seriously and that no gift was received.
- On recross, Jackson challenges Proctor's claim that no evidence implicated Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, or Colin Albert by focusing on Proctor's role in gathering evidence; Proctor says he was one part of a larger detective group and agrees he was the case officer and lead detective.
- Lt. Tully testified that the snowbank search recovered red and clear plastic pieces and a left black Nike sneaker within a five-foot area, and he described their handling and storage.
Notable Quotes
Alan Jackson
“Hopefully she kills herself.”
Jackson read this February 4, 2022 text during cross-examination as part of the defense challenge to Proctor's conduct and impartiality.
Alan Jackson
“Proctor, you're the one responsible for gathering the evidence, correct?”
Jackson challenged Proctor's no-evidence assertion by focusing on his evidence-gathering role; Proctor said he was one part of a larger detective group and agreed he was case officer and lead detective.
Adam Lally
“At the time that you made those inexcusable and unprofessional comments, what did you believe the defendant had done to Mr. O'Keefe?”
On redirect, Lally characterized Proctor's texts as inexcusable and unprofessional before questioning him about the evidence underlying his conclusions.
7h 16m