Kevin O'Hara - Direct
327 linesJUDGE CANNONE: ...able to follow the instructions and refrain from discussing this case with anyone since we left here last week? Everyone said yes and nodded affirmatively. Were you also able to follow the instructions and refrain from doing any independent research or investigation into this? Everyone said yes and nodded affirmatively. Did anyone happen to see, hear, or read anything about this case since we were last here? Now, jurors, before we start, I do want to give you that instruction again on what is evidence. So in considering the testimony of any witness, remember that the questions that are asked are not evidence — only the answers, which are— —really the only part of the exchange between the lawyers and the witnesses that are under oath — are evidence.
JUDGE CANNONE: So if a witness is asked, "Isn't it true that after you learned that your uncle left you money in his will, you poisoned him?" and the witness answers no, then based solely on that question and answer, there's no evidence that the witness has an uncle, that the uncle had a will, that the uncle left the witness money, that the witness knew that the uncle left the witness money, or that the witness poisoned him. So keep that in mind for reference when you're listening to testimony. All right, Mr. Lally, who's your first witness?
MR. LALLY: The Commonwealth would call Lieutenant Kevin O'Hara to the stand.
JUDGE CANNONE: Okay.
COURT CLERK: Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
MR. O'HARA: I do.
JUDGE CANNONE: Good morning. Forgive me. Arnold, anytime you're ready.
MR. LALLY: Thank you. Good morning, sir.
MR. O'HARA: Morning, sir.
MR. LALLY: Could you please state your name?
MR. O'HARA: Kevin O'Hara, O-H-A-R-A.
MR. LALLY: And how are you employed?
MR. O'HARA: I'm a lieutenant with the Massachusetts State Police.
MR. LALLY: And how long in total have you been a member of the State Police?
MR. O'HARA: Just over 22 years.
MR. LALLY: And how long have you held the rank of lieutenant?
MR. O'HARA: Four and a half years.
MR. LALLY: And what is your current assignment?
MR. O'HARA: I'm the team commander for the State Police Special Emergency Response Team, which is also known as SERT, and the SERT team within the state.
MR. LALLY: Approximately how many members of that unit are there?
MR. O'HARA: We have 61 team members, four of which are full-time, including myself. The other 57 have other primary duty assignments, and SERT is an additional duty for them.
MR. LALLY: Now, generally speaking, what are sort of the duties and responsibilities of SERT?
MR. O'HARA: SERT is the primary search and rescue team for the State Police. We conduct lost missing person searches, evidence searches, we do security or crowd control at large-scale events such as the 4th of July, the Boston Marathon, Gillette Stadium, dignitary security.
MR. LALLY: And how long have you been assigned to that unit?
MR. O'HARA: Since 2014.
MR. LALLY: Now, were you working with that unit on January 29th, 2022?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, I was, sir.
MR. LALLY: And at some point in the afternoon on that day, were you contacted by Lieutenant Brian Tully?
MR. O'HARA: Yes. At 2:32 p.m., Lieutenant Tully gave me a phone call.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as Lieutenant Tully is concerned, were you familiar with him? Were you familiar with what unit he supervises?
MR. O'HARA: Yes. I know he's the supervisor for the Norfolk County State Police detective unit.
MR. LALLY: If you could describe to the jury the process by which your particular unit is activated — is that an instantaneous thing, or how does that normally work?
MR. O'HARA: We'll receive a courtesy phone call, which is what I received from Lieutenant Tully, seeing if we were available, if this was — if we had members that could respond today for an incident he had ongoing. I told him we would be available. He then has to submit a request through his chain of command, which is the Division of Investigative Services. I also have to submit a request up my chain of command, which is through Field Services, to get approval on my end. It has to be approved by the Special Operations Commander, which is a major, and depending on the request, it may even go above his level to the lieutenant colonel, who is in charge of the Division of Field Services.
MR. LALLY: So that initial call that you received about 2:32 in the afternoon — how would you characterize that?
MR. O'HARA: Again, I say it was more of a courtesy notification, just to make sure we weren't on another assignment, that we had members who could respond that day. Obviously there was the weather issue that day, making sure members could respond to the scene.
MR. LALLY: And the weather issue that day — what kind of weather was that?
MR. O'HARA: It was a blizzard. I think most areas received between 18 to 20 inches of snow.
MR. LALLY: And as far as that initial call — as far as what was described to you, as far as the situation that you were responding to — what, if anything, did he say?
MR. O'HARA: He said they were conducting a death investigation in the town of Canton and he was looking for SERT assistance with an evidence search.
MR. LALLY: And how did you respond to that request?
MR. O'HARA: On that call, I told them we would have members that would be able to respond, and that I would start working on the approval process. Looking out my own window — I had been outside my house that day — I had large snow drifts at the end of my driveway. I told them building a roster and having members clear their driveway means at least an hour plus for a response time.
MR. LALLY: And following that initial conversation?
MR. O'HARA: Yeah — I'm not positive if he called me or if I called him. I think after I cleared my driveway I spoke to my captain, just to make sure — see what the status was on the approval process on our end. He said we were cleared on our end, so either Lieutenant Tully called me or I may have called him, because I was getting nervous — now that my driveway was clear — that the town plow was going to come back and block the end of my driveway again. So I'm not sure who called who, but I called him and told him we were cleared through the Division of Field Services. He also told me that we were cleared on his end — the approval requests had been approved.
MR. LALLY: And do you know approximately what time of day it was when you had that second conversation?
MR. O'HARA: It's probably about quarter to four, because we sent out an alert to our team at 3:48 telling them that we were authorized to respond to Canton.
MR. LALLY: And as far as your team was concerned, speak a bit about sort of that process as far as response — how were you able to organize that?
MR. O'HARA: So SERT is broken up — we're geographically dispersed across the state, so we have an East team and West team. I had reached out to a supervisor from the West team, someone I knew, who I wouldn't request to drive that far in the snowy conditions, to set up a roster for us. So he sent out an alert to the team at 2:53 requesting an availability list. I told him to just confirm that the people who respond either had a truck or some kind of four-wheel drive vehicle to respond.
MR. LALLY: And where was it that you were told to go — where did you eventually respond?
MR. O'HARA: Lieutenant Tully told us that we were going to 34 Fairview Road in Canton.
MR. LALLY: And from the time that you cleared your driveway and secured response from your higher-ups — what time was it that you left? How long did it take you to get from your home to there?
MR. O'HARA: Well, like I said, the alert went out authorizing the team to start responding at 3:48. I got the exact address via text from Lieutenant Tully at 4:10. We sent out another alert message at 4:17 just reminding people to bring shovels, brooms, rakes, etc. I left my house at 4:13 in the afternoon and I got on scene at 4:56, so it took me 43 minutes to drive there.
MR. LALLY: And from your house to that location — about how long — absent the weather — how long would that take?
MR. O'HARA: Probably 20 minutes, sir.
MR. LALLY: And when you responded, how many other members of the unit were able to respond?
MR. O'HARA: Initially we dispatched eight members, including myself. Only seven of us made it to the scene — one of the members could not get off his street. The end of his street had been plowed in by his town, and he had called his town DPW to try to get some assistance, but he was not able to make it to the scene. So we only had seven — again, after we initially started with eight — which did kind of shift some of the dynamics of how we ran the search on scene.
MR. LALLY: And when you first arrived on scene, did anyone precede your arrival?
MR. O'HARA: Just one other trooper from SERT. Trooper Beausoleil was on scene — I believe he arrived two minutes prior to my arrival.
MR. LALLY: Could you say that name again and spell it for us?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir. It's Trooper Jason Beausoleil — B-E-A-U-S-O-L-E-I-L.
MR. LALLY: Thank you.
MR. O'HARA: You're welcome.
MR. LALLY: And Lieutenant, when you arrived on scene, where did you park in relation to the house?
MR. O'HARA: Trooper Beausoleil was just past the driveway of the house, so just north of the driveway. I parked almost at the end of the driveway of 34 Fairview.
MR. LALLY: You recall — at some point your attention was directed to an area with [unintelligible]?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: And you recall which direction your vehicles were facing when you parked in that area?
MR. O'HARA: Vehicles near the driveway were facing away from the flagpole originally. Eventually we moved his vehicle back towards the flagpole — we just wanted some extra headlights to light up the scene, the area we would be working in.
MR. LALLY: Now, was Lieutenant Tully on scene when you arrived?
MR. O'HARA: He was not.
MR. LALLY: And at some point, did you reach out to him?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, I gave him a call. He stated he was just leaving Canton PD, and would be on scene in about five minutes. That was probably around 5 o'clock.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as the house that you were parked in front of, and as far as the residences on that street — did you see anyone else — as far as neighbors or anything like that — anyone from the house or outside of the house at any point in time?
MR. O'HARA: We didn't see anyone outside the houses. A resident of 34 Fairview exited briefly after we were first on scene — that was the only person we saw.
MR. LALLY: And did they come down?
MR. O'HARA: He was — if you look at the house, there's — you consider two front doors, one on the [— closer to the garage, which would maybe be a mud room or a den. An adult male exited from that door with a hooded sweatshirt on. He asked us if we were here for what had happened earlier. We said yes, and he walked back inside the house.
MR. LALLY: Now as far as — you mentioned a bit about the snow — as far as the roadway conditions in the area where you were, what if anything did you observe in regard to the roadway and how it had been treated?
MR. O'HARA: The plow really only cleared the center of the road. There was a good 3 to 4 foot snow drift coming off each side of the road, so maybe enough for two vehicles to pass, but not cleared — excuse me — cleared curb to curb.
MR. LALLY: And as far as Lieutenant Tully arriving on scene — at some point, what if anything did he direct you to do?
MR. O'HARA: He had instructed us that the death investigation involved a motor vehicle. He told us where the motor vehicle was believed to have been parked and to search from that area south towards the flagpole and fire hydrant.
MR. LALLY: Now as far as this type of search, what if any experience did you have doing this type of search in blizzard conditions?
MR. O'HARA: We've really never done evidence searches like this. We've done missing person searches — we've gone out for those — but for evidence searches, nothing like this. If a scene could be secured, we really wouldn't respond in a situation like this unless we really needed to.
MR. LALLY: Now as far as the search that your team does, was it typical or not typical as far as conducting a search of an area that had already been gone over by another agency or by someone else?
MR. O'HARA: Yeah, we're a stage two response, so pretty much every search we've ever done has been previously searched. We're never really the first persons to search an area.
MR. LALLY: And can you describe sort of the difference between what you do as far as searching is concerned and sort of looking or making observations?
MR. O'HARA: I think our training is a lot different than maybe the regular patrolman or trooper responding. There's not much training provided anymore in the academy, so we do extensive training through a lot of the search and rescue groups that we're a part of, which would be the National Association for Search and Rescue, which is NASAR. We do search and rescue initial actions, we do line searching, managing lost person incidents, we do multiple trainings a month with the team, which is different than what other personnel would get. I think traditionally, looking back to even my time before I was a member of SERT, the search would be "you go this way, I'll go that way" — there was really no methodical approach to the search.
MR. LALLY: And as far as your training is concerned as it relates to this particular search, what if any sort of methodical approach did you employ?
MR. O'HARA: We gridded off or marked off the area Lieutenant Tully thought would be the best area for us to search, so we had a starting point and an endpoint. Once all the members got on scene, we set up a line search, or what we call a grid search, which again would just be a slow, methodical search with all of us working in unison moving through the area.
MR. LALLY: About how big an area was it that you set out to search?
MR. O'HARA: Just over 50 feet, I believe — from the front door, which is the left door looking at the house from the street, to the fire hydrant. I believe it was 59 feet.
MR. LALLY: Was that the length?
MR. O'HARA: That is the length.
MR. LALLY: And as far as the width of the area that you were searching, about what was it?
MR. O'HARA: About 3 to 4 feet — that was the snow drift coming off the curb.
MR. LALLY: Now as far as the information that you received prior to conducting the search, were there any items specifically identified as far as what you might be looking for, or what if anything was communicated in relation to that?
MR. O'HARA: Yeah, Lieutenant Tully had informed us that the victim in this case was struck by a vehicle. He believed there would be broken pieces of tail light in the area. He also stated the victim was missing his sneaker, so he asked us to search for both of those items.
MR. LALLY: Sir, at some point did you ask Lieutenant Tully any questions about the vehicle in question or anything in relation to that?
MR. O'HARA: After we found one or two of the pieces of the tail light, I asked him if he knew how much damage had been done to the tail light, or if he had a photo that we could get of the tail light.
MR. LALLY: And what if anything did he tell you?
MR. O'HARA: He told us at that time the vehicle was being towed back to Canton PD, so he did not have a photo to show us.
MR. LALLY: And at any point did he make any reference to who was coming along with the vehicle?
MR. O'HARA: He said Sergeant Bukhenik and Trooper Proctor were following the vehicle back to Canton PD.
MR. LALLY: He mentioned an alert that was sent out to troopers as far as bringing certain items — can you describe for the jury the process, what kind of tools or implements you used, and sort of how that search worked?
MR. O'HARA: So like I said, we moved Trooper Beausoleil's vehicle to face the scene to give us extra headlights for the scene. All the team members also put on a headlamp, which would basically just be like a hiking headlamp. We all had shovels, we had a couple of rakes — the smaller garden rakes — just to kind of help us sift through the snow. And I also had a small push broom to move the snow around as well.
MR. LALLY: You mentioned the headlamps and moving the vehicle for the headlights — as far as the area that you were searching, the visibility and lighting conditions around that area at that time?
MR. O'HARA: It was poor lighting. There really wasn't much as far as what we had for street lighting, but with the headlamps we had decent visibility.
MR. LALLY: When you first arrived, at about 4:53 p.m. or so?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it was.
MR. LALLY: Remaining daylight?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: And in the area that you were looking — your testimony was there wasn't much overhead ambient lighting or street lighting in that area?
MR. O'HARA: Nothing that really helped the search.
MR. LALLY: So the area that you were searching was in the area of the fire hydrant, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: We started almost directly across from the front door and moved south towards Chapman Street, towards the fire hydrant.
MR. LALLY: As far as the area that you were searching with shovels and the other implements — where was your focus as far as the street versus the front lawn?
MR. O'HARA: Our right flank was on the curb, and then we moved out across the street from there. So we were lined almost shoulder to shoulder as we moved south through the area.
MR. LALLY: You were primarily — or entirely — searching along the roadway, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: And as far as — at some point during the course of shoveling and snow removal from that area, did you come in contact with the grass area?
MR. O'HARA: We did. One of the members who was working along the curb started to clear some of the grass on the front lawn.
MR. LALLY: Yes, sir — what if any issues did you encounter out there when you got to the grass?
MR. O'HARA: It was very difficult to clear the snow. I don't think we had very good visibility on what we were moving, even with the push broom and the rake. It was very difficult to definitively say we'd cleared the lawn properly, so we didn't focus too much of our efforts on that area.
MR. LALLY: You referenced that seven members of your unit were able to respond because one of them was stuck in their street, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: And that had some impact as far as documentation, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. Normally on a search, if I'm the team leader, I would run what you consider a command post, or be the Incident Commander. I would stay behind the line and kind of document our efforts, but because this was such a small search area it wasn't really an issue — we weren't breaking people off into teams, no one was out of my sight line, and we had multiple detectives on scene that were able to fill that role for me.
MR. LALLY: And so to that point, as far as the seven members from your unit — in addition to those seven members, was there anyone else?
MR. O'HARA: I believe there were about five other members. I believe there were only two that I recognized from the state police, so I'm not sure who the other three were — they were Canton detectives or Canton patrolmen, but they were all dressed in, you know, plainclothes.
MR. LALLY: And as far as documentation at the scene, what if anything was done?
MR. O'HARA: As we began to find evidence, I spoke to Lieutenant Tully and just confirmed that he was going to document everything we were recovering via photograph and evidence log.
MR. LALLY: As far as documentation — were photos taken by Lieutenant Tully?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, they were, sir.
MR. LALLY: And the items that were photographed — were they photographed prior to anyone touching them, moving them, or placing them elsewhere?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. As soon as we found anything deemed as evidence, we stopped our search efforts until they were documented by Lieutenant Tully.
MR. LALLY: And in reference to your search efforts, what items of evidentiary value did you and your team find?
MR. O'HARA: I found multiple pieces of red and clear tail light.
MR. LALLY: And where were they relative to the area that you were searching?
MR. O'HARA: They were on the street, in between the flagpole and the fire hydrant.
MR. LALLY: And sir, in addition to the pieces of red and clear plastic, approximately how many pieces were you able to locate?
MR. O'HARA: I believe maybe six or seven pieces.
MR. LALLY: And how big or small did they range in size?
MR. O'HARA: There were three larger pieces — two red, one clear — and then a couple of smaller pieces.
MR. LALLY: In addition to the pieces of red and clear plastic, what if any other items did you find?
MR. O'HARA: We found a sneaker.
MR. LALLY: And where was that sneaker located in reference to your search area and in reference to the pieces of red and clear plastic?
MR. O'HARA: Same location generally — it was in between the flagpole and the fire hydrant. The sneaker was flush up against the curb and it was upside down. I think we had found one piece of tail light prior to the sneaker, and then after we found the sneaker we found a few more additional pieces of ...tail light.
MR. LALLY: Now, with reference to the sneaker and each of those pieces of red and clear plastics, where were they in relation to the snow that was being dug through?
MR. O'HARA: Where were they in relation to — can you repeat the end of that, sir?
MR. LALLY: With reference to each of the items — talking about the sneaker or the red and clear plastic — where were they in relation to the snow that you were digging into?
MR. O'HARA: They were close to the curb. As we started digging originally, the snow drift — the snow pack was pretty solid from where the plow had kind of cleared to. So once we were able to move through that, we started getting into fresh, undisturbed snow. Started moving through that, which is a lot easier to move at that point. And all the items we found were close to the curb.
MR. LALLY: And so my question also is, sort of, how deep within was each of those?
MR. O'HARA: They were all found at ground level.
MR. LALLY: And as far as the area that you were searching — beyond the snow drifts and plowing towards the middle of the road — how would you characterize that, sir, as far as observing footprints, tracks, or anything in that area?
MR. O'HARA: No, we did not see anything. So, like I said, it was all fresh, undisturbed snow once we got past where the plow had cleared up to.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as this search being conducted physically — you mentioned there's some sort of line that's set up, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: Can you describe to the jury sort of how that line was set up — the different functions in different parts of the line?
MR. O'HARA: So, like I stated, we had — we consider our right flank — stood on the curb closest to the house, and then we moved left into the street. As we dug the snow out, it was originally inspected — as they would pull their shovel out, make sure they didn't have anything in their shovel to the best of their ability, then they would bring it out to the street. I was the left flank. They would dump it in the street and I would sift through it at the end, just to make sure there was no evidence that had come out to the street. Once I was positive nothing was in that snow, I would toss it onto the other side of the street, and we just continued that process as we moved south through that grid.
MR. LALLY: And the depth of the snow that you were digging through — how did that change, or how was it any different from the section where the plow had touched?
MR. O'HARA: You know, I would say that was probably about a 3-plus-foot in height, but as we moved into the snow itself, getting closer to the curb, that was level with the rest of the area — what was on the front lawn, which was on the neighbor's lawn — so probably eight, maybe 18 inches of snow.
MR. LALLY: Sir, as far as this search was concerned — about how long a period of time were you on scene as far as searching? How long a process?
MR. O'HARA: After Lieutenant Tully showed up and informed us where we were going to search, we moved Trooper
PARENTHETICAL: [unclear]
MR. O'HARA: 's vehicle at 5:20, and that's when the rest of the team started to show up, right around 5:21, 5:24. A couple of other members with extended response time showed up a little bit after that, but all members were on scene by 5:41. We had already started the process before they had all arrived on scene, and we were complete by 6:15. We started to wrap up and clear the area.
MR. LALLY: As far as the wrapping up — how was that decision arrived at? What led to that decision?
MR. O'HARA: So after we found the sneaker and a couple of additional pieces of tail light, we moved south for — I'd say over 5 feet, maybe closer to 8 to 10 feet — without finding any other pieces of evidence. So Lieutenant Tully and I had a conversation. He was very satisfied that we had found everything we were going to locate at that time, and we decided to suspend the search.
MR. LALLY: And what was — as far as you were concerned, with weather conditions and everything going on — what was your thought process in relation to any sort of [unintelligible]?
MR. O'HARA: I told Lieutenant Tully we'll do a debrief at the end. We'll go over probability of detection — how I feel, whether we would have found everything that was there. I told him that there was a good chance we did not find everything. I said, if you wanted us to come back in the daylight — which would give us better lighting to search — or after a couple of days, the weather was supposed to warm up, if you wanted us to come back after there was some snow melt, just reach out to me and we would come back.
MR. LALLY: And as far as suspending the search at that point — was that something that was your decision independently?
MR. O'HARA: No, that was in consultation with Lieutenant Tully.
MR. LALLY: You mentioned — you received information that they were following a vehicle to the station, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: Sir, at any point in time that you were on scene, did you — either Sergeant Bukhenik or —
MR. O'HARA: Yes, I know both of them, sir.
MR. LALLY: And at any point in time that you were on scene —
MR. O'HARA: No, they were not on scene.
MR. LALLY: So the other sort of troopers that you mentioned were around — they were not —
MR. O'HARA: Correct. They were not there, no, sir.
MR. LALLY: Now, as far as the securing of evidence — how was that done, generally speaking, in relation to operations that your unit conducts? And how was it done?
MR. O'HARA: So, we don't recover evidence. We'll stop and halt our search — sometimes we've been waiting for Crime Scene to show up for 2 hours before we've continued to search. So once we found the first piece of tail light, again I conferred with Lieutenant Tully, asked him if he was documenting it and recovering everything. He stated that he was. Once we felt comfortable that he had done that properly, we then continued the search.
MR. LALLY: So once you get those initial parameters as far as where and what you may be looking for — directing your search efforts — he is not?
MR. O'HARA: No.
MR. LALLY: Is that as far as how the search will be conducted?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. Yes. Yeah, they let me run the search the way I deem best.
MR. LALLY: So in addition to photographs, what if anything else was done to document?
MR. O'HARA: We had one of our members use a handheld GPS — we use a Garmin 64st — and he marked each item we found, which we can then upload later to a map, which we did later that evening.
MR. LALLY: If you could just describe, during that process as far as mapping is concerned, how the global positioning system, or GPS, is utilized in creating that.
MR. O'HARA: Correct. So the Garmin GPS we use — it connects to four different satellites to give you the best range of your location. There obviously is some margin of error involved with GPSs, but he was able to stamp three of the items — three pieces of the tail light. But as he was marking those items on his GPS, they kept — because they were in such close proximity, they were almost marking directly on top of each other. So he only marked three of them because it was just going to clutter the map as we continued, if you were to mark all the pieces we located.
MR. LALLY: So with respect to the three pieces of tail light that were marked — excuse me — those, the larger pieces or smaller pieces?
MR. O'HARA: They were the larger pieces, sir.
MR. LALLY: Sir, I'm showing you a series — briefly. I'm going to ask you in a moment if you recognize — do you recognize what's in those photographs, sir?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir. It's the area we searched and some of the evidence that we recovered.
MR. LALLY: I move to introduce and admit the next exhibits. Any objection?
MR. YANNETTI: No objection.
JUDGE CANNONE: Thank you. Thank you, sir. Mark — all right. Oh, I'm sorry. She needs to have — [garbled — court reporter attention to record] — it's very important that we keep our record straight. It will be important for you during the deliberations that we do this. Sometimes it takes a while. We're fortunate we've got such a great court reporter here to take care of this for us. But sometimes it takes a while. I caution counsel that maybe you can all work together so that we don't take up any extra time. All right. Do you need those photos back, Mr. Lally?
MR. LALLY: All right.
COURT CLERK: [unintelligible] Thank you. Permission to mark. Yes. Approach witness? Yes.
MR. LALLY: Okay. Thank you. Lieutenant — Lieutenant, what you have up on the screen before you — is that what you have?
MR. O'HARA: 034 — I'm sorry, one — hold on — might be backwards here. Yes, 111, sir.
MR. LALLY: And if you could describe to the jury, using that laser pointer, what if anything is significant?
MR. O'HARA: This is the flag pole in front of the house. As you move south, this appears to be one of the pieces of tail light that we recovered.
MR. LALLY: Back out a little. Now, as far as — when you're conducting the search and when the actual searching process — what was the weather doing while you were doing —
MR. O'HARA: Yes —
JUDGE CANNONE: Because of the air conditioning, so you need to speak up really loudly if you don't have a microphone in front of you.
MR. LALLY: And so, Lieutenant, during the course of the process that you're conducting this search, what was the weather doing? And is that something that you can observe in this?
MR. O'HARA: It was still snowing, and you can see some of the snowflakes falling here by the flag pole.
MR. LALLY: As far as the wind was concerned, what impact did the wind have on the course of the search?
MR. O'HARA: It was windy, but it really didn't impact how we were searching through the area.
MR. LALLY: Sir, if I can direct your attention to the next photograph. Okay, what's up on the screen — is that what you have before you?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is — sort of a different perspective of the same area that you were talking about in the last photograph.
MR. LALLY: Is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: I have the next photograph, 113. Again, what's up on the screen — is that what you have before you at 113?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is, and again a sort of closer perspective to the tail light that you were referring to.
MR. LALLY: Is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
JUDGE CANNONE: Okay, you really have to speak up again, Lieutenant.
MR. LALLY: What's up on the... ...screen, is that what you have before you?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is. Again, a closer up image of that same piece of tail light as it was observed when you recovered it. Correct. And you can see right here to the left of the tail light — that is the molding of a shovel. So this piece of tail light was picked up by one of the team member's shovels, and as they overturned it, you can see the tail light came up as they were searching through the area. This is kind of the markings of the shovel itself.
JUDGE CANNONE: Yeah, so we're going to have to turn the air conditioning off for this — we can't hear you at all.
PARENTHETICAL: [unidentified]
JUDGE CANNONE: : Yes, please.
MR. O'HARA: The issue is I'm trying to move away from —
JUDGE CANNONE: Understand. So we need to turn the air conditioning off so that we can hear you.
MR. LALLY: And again, Lieutenant, what's up on the screen — is that what you have before you as the next photograph?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is.
MR. LALLY: Could you describe for the jury what we're looking at?
MR. O'HARA: You see the piece of tail light that we recovered, and again this is kind of the overturned snow from the shovel, and again seeing the markings from the shovel from where it was overturned.
MR. LALLY: And the next photograph — is this particular piece one of the larger or one of the smaller pieces that you were describing earlier?
MR. O'HARA: This is one of the larger pieces, sir.
MR. LALLY: And as far as the size of it, if you know — how much would you estimate, how big?
MR. O'HARA: I guess a couple of inches, but I didn't measure it.
MR. LALLY: And if I have the next photograph — Lieutenant, if you could describe to the jury sort of what is depicted, or what, if anything significant, you observe.
MR. O'HARA: So this is the SERT members working through the area, again working as a line through the grid formation. One of the things we stress is your critical separation — making sure you're close enough to each other that you won't miss a piece of evidence. If you're too far apart, you will miss that. A lot of times before searches, we will take an item of similar size — the similar size item that we're looking for — and we'll space out. Because this was such a condensed search area, we just had the team members stand almost shoulder to shoulder as they search through the area.
MR. LALLY: And the next photograph — and again, if you could describe for the jury sort of what we're looking at, or what, if anything significant, you observe.
MR. O'HARA: May be a little difficult to see from a distance, but right here, this is the sneaker that we recovered.
MR. LALLY: And as far as the area of the curbing that you indicated — the sneaker was recovered in relation to where — where is that?
MR. O'HARA: It's flush up against the curb. I'm sorry, I apologize, sir — right here, this would be the curbing right here.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph — is there, similar, as far as this photograph is concerned — what things do you observe in that photograph?
MR. O'HARA: It's a closer photo of the sneaker. Sneaker is in the bottom right down here.
MR. LALLY: Next photograph — again, what if anything are we looking at in this photograph?
MR. O'HARA: Again, you're looking at the sneaker. This is just a closer, zoomed-in photo. And this would be the curbing right here, and the sneaker's [unintelligible] in this particular photograph.
MR. LALLY: Is that as it was when it was recovered?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: Next photograph — the other side of that, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: Is that sort of in relation to the curb that you were describing earlier in your testimony?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir. You see the curbing right here.
MR. LALLY: Next. Now, as far as the sneaker was concerned — when you recovered it, where was the snow in relation to — was it on, around, in — where was the snow in relation?
MR. O'HARA: The sneaker was completely buried. It wasn't until we started digging through the snow that we found the sneaker.
MR. LALLY: And this is how it was discovered, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: How it appeared when it was discovered?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: And, sir, in this photograph, if you could, using the laser pointer, draw the jury's attention to what is of significance. Exhibit 125 is the photo I have in front of me — this would be — might be difficult for them to see, but
MR. O'HARA: This is a clear piece of the tail light right here.
MR. LALLY: Next — and again, so what is depicted in exhibit 126? We see a little closer, zoomed-in version of the clear piece of tail light that was recovered. As far as the area of snow surrounding — is that the depth at which that piece of clear plastic tail light was discovered?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: Next, exhibit 127 — anything we're looking at in this one?
MR. O'HARA: A different angle of the piece of clear tail light that was recovered.
MR. LALLY: The next photograph, exhibit 128 — if you could describe to the jury what is —
MR. O'HARA: It's difficult to see, but there's a piece of clear tail light right here. I can see with the photo in front of me, but I'm not sure if the jurors can see it from that distance. But there is a clear piece of tail light in this location.
MR. LALLY: 129 — if you could — jury — anything?
MR. O'HARA: Again, there's a piece of clear tail light right in this location.
MR. LALLY: Different piece of tail light than the one you were referring to?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, sir.
MR. LALLY: Exhibit 130 — what if anything — what are we looking at?
MR. O'HARA: Again, there's a piece of clear tail light — again, might be difficult from the distance for the jurors — but it's in this location here.
MR. LALLY: Next, exhibit 131 — what if anything is depicted?
MR. O'HARA: There's a larger piece of red tail light located on the ground in this location.
PARENTHETICAL: [unidentified]
MR. O'HARA: : Yes.
MR. LALLY: And next, exhibit 132 — what are we looking at in this one?
MR. O'HARA: It's a closer photo of the same piece of tail light right here, located on the ground.
MR. LALLY: 133 — what if anything is depicted?
MR. O'HARA: We see a small piece of tail light, I believe, in this location right here. It's a small piece of tail light right on the ground right here in this location.
MR. LALLY: Look at those and look up. What are those, sir?
MR. O'HARA: examines
MR. LALLY: Do you recognize those?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, I do, sir.
MR. LALLY: What do you recognize those to be?
MR. O'HARA: This is the mapping system we use to map evidence we recover.
MR. LALLY: And are those diagrams created pursuant to that mapping system?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, they are.
MR. LALLY: What's contained in those diagrams — is that a fair and accurate portrayal of where items were recovered in relation to various markers on scene at 34 Fairview on January 29th?
MR. O'HARA: In the afternoon, yeah. The marks showing on the map — they're a little offset, but that falls in the range of error with the handheld GPS's.
MR. LALLY: May I approach again?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
MR. LALLY: And, your Honor, with the court's permission, may I publish those, one in each succession, to the jury?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
MR. LALLY: Now, Lieutenant — would you have before you the first diagram? Exhibit 135 — is that what's up on the screen?
MR. O'HARA: Yes, it is, sir.
MR. LALLY: You mentioned something earlier in your testimony, just now, in regard to sort of items being found in close proximity, creating some overlay with the GPS system — is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: And you mentioned a range of error — is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: Describe what the range of error is and how that impacts how it's depicted in this particular diagram.
MR. O'HARA: So for GPS's, the typical range of error on a clear day is up to 16 feet. Obviously we didn't have a clear day — we had atmospheric conditions, cloudy, snowy conditions. GPS's can be affected for range accuracy by a few different things. One is the satellite geometry — as I said before, the GPS connects to four different satellites. You also could have signal blockage. Blockage could occur from trees, buildings, bridges. Then you have atmospheric conditions, like I mentioned. And then you have the receiver end — any issues with your receiver end, which is actually the handheld GPS. Those will be the four main issues, and why you may have a little offset on your GPS readings. But again, typically under clear sky conditions, would be up to 16 feet.
MR. LALLY: And so, using the laser pointer, if you could direct the jury's attention to what, any sort of significant markers, or what marks —
MR. O'HARA: Back here — I've listed as the command post, which is where my vehicle was parked. We have the address, which is the house, 34 Fairview. Then as you move further south, you'll see the first red plastic that we recovered — which again was a larger piece of red plastic — kind of stamped on top of each other. But you'll see the sneaker, you'll see a second red piece of plastic, and you'll see the fire hydrant, all marked on the map.
MR. LALLY: Thank you. If I could have the next diagram, please. ...what's up on the screen — is that what you have before you?
MR. O'HARA: Exhibit 136. Yes, it is.
MR. LALLY: And again, if you can describe to the jury sort of what we're looking at in this diagram, or what, if anything, is different between 136 and 135.
MR. O'HARA: We just changed the layering on the map, just to make it a little easier to read. So we removed the tail light pieces, and now we just have the sneaker and the fire hydrant listed on the map here.
MR. LALLY: And that area — as far as you were talking, sort of the concentration of search — was in the area of the flagpole and the fire hydrant, is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir. Again, we started closer to — almost directly across from the front door. The evidence — recovery all happened between the flagpole and the fire hydrant.
MR. LALLY: And if you could, or if it's possible on this diagram that you have up on the screen, could you using the laser pointer direct the jury's attention to where the items of evidence were located?
MR. O'HARA: The search would have begun right in this area, and as we move south we started finding pieces of evidence right around here.
MR. LALLY: And then the area that you went — somewhere between 5 to 10 feet — is that the testimony? Beyond when you started to not find any more items of evidentiary value, was that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. We had gone past the fire hydrant, hadn't found any other pieces of evidence — it's probably closer to 8 to 10 feet, and that's when we suspended the search.
MR. LALLY: So just using that laser pointer, could you direct the jury's attention to that 8 to 10 feet — in which direction was that from the —
MR. O'HARA: Heading south towards Chapman Street, so down in this location would be where we stopped.
MR. LALLY: Thank you. May I approach to retrieve this?
JUDGE CANNONE: Yes.
MR. LALLY: Now, sir, at any point in time that you were on scene, were you able to look at or see any sort of photographs or any images of the damage to the tail light?
MR. O'HARA: No, I was not.
MR. LALLY: So fair to say that at the time that you're conducting your search on that particular afternoon, you weren't aware of how much tail light could be there, or how much you might be looking for?
MR. O'HARA: Correct. We did not know how much damage there was.
MR. LALLY: Now, you talked a little bit about — well, let me ask you this. As far as from your training and experience in relation to conducting these types of searches, are you familiar with a term known as POD?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: So there'll be probability of detection. And I believe you've referenced earlier in your testimony some variables that go into that terminology — is that correct?
MR. O'HARA: Correct.
MR. LALLY: And can you describe to the jury sort of what some of those variables are and how it related to this particular search?
MR. O'HARA: So probability of detection, it winds up turning into a mathematical formula. To make it simpler, give us more of a baseline objective on how well we did searching the area — it covers 10 different categories. We'll rate those categories 1 through 10 on how we feel we did, and kind of come up with a score to give just a baseline on what we think, percentage-wise, we would have found the objects we're looking for. Those categories would include terrain as number one, hazards would be two, lighting would be three, weather would be four, vegetation would be five — which in this case would have been some of the grass we encountered as we got on the front lawn.
MR. O'HARA: As you continue on would be your spacing, which again is how the team members are separated as we're searching through the area, the tactics you're using, the area size, then the team composition, and then the last one is instinct and variables. And really the last two, I think, is what works best for us — what stands out most about our team is your team composition and the instincts, just for the experience we have in searching.
MR. LALLY: So was it those variables that sort of led to the conclusion, in conjunction with yourself and Lieutenant Tully, to cease searching at that particular point — after you had gone 8 to 10 feet south of the evidentiary items without locating any other evidentiary items?
MR. O'HARA: Correct, sir.
MR. LALLY: I have no further questions for this witness.