Trial 2 Trial Day
◀ Day 13 Trial 2 Day 15 ▶

Day 14 - May 12, 2025

Bukhenik (Cross/Redirect/Recross)

4Proceedings
3Pages
1Witnesses
1,983Lines
Day 14 of 36
Appearing:

Jackson challenged Bukhenik over corrected sallyport video and a camera-feed time jump; redirect covered video inversion and fragment recoveries. On recross, Bukhenik said a Higgins-jealousy aspect was not pursued and had no information on logged phone steps.

Full day summary

Day 14 concluded Alan Jackson's cross-examination of Sergeant Yuri Bukhenik, followed by redirect and recross. Jackson challenged Bukhenik with corrected sallyport video; Bukhenik said it reflected his memory and that, if the person was Proctor, he appeared to walk to the SUV's right rear. A separate feed showed a timestamp jump, but the testimony did not establish its cause. Jackson also questioned Bukhenik about a performance review written after the 'no nudes so far' text chain; Bukhenik said the text did not show integrity or honor. On redirect, ADA Brennan elicited that the camera had recorded inverted before January 29 and introduced Proctor-recovered fragments not covered on direct. On recross, Bukhenik said a possible Higgins-jealousy aspect was not followed up and, after the court narrowed an objected-to phone-data question, said he had no information about logged steps on O'Keefe's phone.

  • Jackson showed corrected sallyport video; Bukhenik said it reflected his memory and that, if the person was Proctor, he appeared to walk to the SUV's right rear. An opposite feed showed a timestamp jump whose cause the testimony did not establish.
  • Jackson questioned Bukhenik about a performance review written after the 'no nudes so far' text chain. Bukhenik said he acknowledged the chain with a thumbs-up and later testified that the text did not show integrity or honor.
  • On redirect, Brennan introduced Proctor-recovered fragments not covered on direct after cross had raised the recoveries, and elicited testimony that the camera recorded inverted before January 29, 2022.
  • On recross, Bukhenik said a Higgins-jealousy aspect was a possibility but was not followed up. He also said he personally took no forensic action on the jeans stains, while testifying that the jeans had been processed and that he did not know the laboratory protocol.
  • Jackson ended recross with an objected-to premise about phone health data and 36 logged steps. After the court narrowed the question, Bukhenik said he had no information about logged steps on O'Keefe's phone.
Alan Jackson
“Motorcycles? Handbags? A pair of shoes? Or naked pictures of Miss Karen Read?”
Jackson pressed Bukhenik on what Proctor's 'no nudes so far' text meant after Bukhenik testified that he acknowledged the chain with a thumbs-up but had no memory of reading the additional text.
Yuri Bukhenik
“This footage, the way it is depicted right now, very accurately represents what I remember from being there.”
Bukhenik said the corrected video accurately reflected his memory and that, if the person was Proctor, he appeared to walk to the SUV's right rear. The testimony did not establish contact with the taillight or the reason for the mirrored presentation.
Yuri Bukhenik
“There's a possibility there, but I didn't see it.”
Bukhenik said a Higgins-jealousy aspect was a possibility but was not followed up based on the totality of the investigation; the exchange reflected the defense's challenge to that investigative decision.
Video thumbnail for Day 14 — Bukhenik (Cross/Redirect/Recross) 7h 4m
Watch →

2. Yuri Bukhenik — Cross (Part 3)

Judge Cannone addresses motions, including Commonwealth Bowden issues; Jackson continues cross-examining Bukhenik on investigative conduct and video evidence.

Procedural
Procedural - Motions
10 lines

Before the jury enters, Judge Cannone addresses motions received that morning and directs the discussion to the Bowden issues. Commonwealth attorney Brennan argues his Bowden memorandum, contending that characterization evidence is inadmissible and that defense questions should have a basis and intended substantive follow-up. He says Bowden permits questions about investigators' state of mind and the scope of the investigation, but argues that questions going beyond those boundaries introduce inadmissible third-party evidence. Judge Cannone directs discussion of specific materials Sergeant Bukhenik has not examined to sidebar because of protective orders. The jury is then brought in and given standard morning instructions.

Cross
Yuri Bukhenik Alan Jackson
972 lines
◀ Day 13 Trial 2 Day 15 ▶