Day 13 - May 16, 2024
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 1 · 6 proceedings · 1,984 lines
Day 13 covers Colin Albert's cross-examination about testimony preparation, family connections, missing messages, threat videos, and separate hand injuries, followed by Matthew McCabe's account of a dark SUV outside 34 Fairview.
Full day summary
Key Moments
- Judge Cannone denies the defense motion to strike harassment testimony, stating she disagrees with Jackson's characterization 'in the strongest way possible.'
- Jackson revisits Colin Albert's initial answer that he had not spoken to anyone to prepare; Albert then acknowledges a meeting with ADA Lally and Sergeant Tully.
- Jackson introduced a wedding photograph showing Colin Albert as a ring bearer and Michael Proctor in the wedding party, using that prior family connection to challenge Proctor's investigation.
- Jackson plays two videos of Albert making explicit physical threats and contrasts Albert's redirect estimate that they were from sophomore year with his prior sworn estimate that they were closer to his junior or senior year; he also questions Albert about explanations for knuckle injuries on separate occasions.
- Matthew McCabe testifies that during three intermittent looks he saw a dark SUV he believed was Read's in different positions outside 34 Fairview, saw no one outside and no footprints, and later noticed the vehicle was gone.
Notable Quotes
Beverly J. Cannone
“I remember clearly the lines of inquiry that you initiated, so I disagree with you in the strongest way possible. You've made your record. Your motion is denied.”
The judge's ruling sets the adversarial tone for the day and forecloses the defense's effort to limit what the jury heard about harassment connected to the Albert and McCabe families.
Alan Jackson
“Right. But you do remember, two and a half years ago, you left 34 Fairview at 12:10 a.m., correct, down to the minute?”
Jackson used the question to contrast Albert's precise timing recollection with his earlier inability to remember a recent preparation meeting; it states the defense credibility challenge, not a finding about Albert's memory.
Alan Jackson
“John O'Keefe looks like he had been beaten to death. He's got two black eyes, a laceration over his right eye, laceration over his nose, a giant wound on the back of his head. And he doesn't look like he was hit by a car — he looks like he was in a physical altercation.”
At sidebar, Jackson argued that O'Keefe's injuries supported a physical-altercation theory rather than a vehicle strike; the quoted statement records the defense position he was presenting.
4h 0m