Day 4 - April 25, 2025
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 2 · 8 proceedings · 768 utterances
The jury views 34 Fairview Road as the prosecution establishes Karen Read's blood alcohol level and paramedic Jason Becker's account of her demeanor and statements becomes the day's central dispute.
Full day summary
Key Moments
- The jury views 34 Fairview Road, with both sides directing attention to competing physical features of the scene including the Lexus's bumper height, the removed tail light, distances between landmarks, and the second-floor window.
- Dr. Gary Faller establishes Karen Read's blood alcohol result of 93 mg/dL and the full chain of custody, from non-alcohol swab protocol through the Roche Cobas analysis.
- Elizabeth Little cross-examines Faller, eliciting that the hospital's test measures NADH rather than ethanol directly and that the lab holds clinical — not forensic — accreditation, and that the witness's MS and anemia were not considered.
- Paramedic Becker testifies that Read's demeanor was consistent with significant trauma and that she referenced an argument as her last communication with O'Keefe while simultaneously showing him missed calls on her phone.
- Prosecution and defense spend three examination rounds contesting whether Read's 'last words' referred to an in-person argument or phone-based voicemails, with Becker's grand jury statement — 'the last time they had talked she had gotten into an argument' — read into the record.
Notable Quotes
Gary Faller
“Correct. And that's because lactic acid or LDH actually forms NADH.”
Faller's concession is the scientific core of the defense's blood alcohol challenge — establishing that the hospital's method measures NADH rather than ethanol and that conditions Read had could produce NADH independent of alcohol.
Jason Becker
“Her demeanor was consistent with having gone through a significant trauma for the situation.”
The first responder's neutral characterization of Read's state as consistent with significant trauma rather than guilt or evasion is among the most consequential observations of the day.
Jason Becker
“Uh, so she — she was also um — she was upset also because she said they had, you know, the last time they had talked she had gotten into an argument. So she was upset that that was like her last words to him.”
Becker reading his full grand jury statement aloud — describing Read's upset over an argument as 'her last words to him' with no mention of voicemails — is the prosecution's anchor against the defense's phone-based reframing.
Procedural - Viewing Openings
Court prepares for and conducts a jury view of 34 Fairview Road in Canton, with both attorneys directing jurors on what to observe at the scene.
+1 procedural segment