Trial 2 Trial Day
◀ Day 3 Trial 2 Day 5 ▶

Day 4 - April 25, 2025

Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 2 · 8 proceedings · 768 utterances

Day 4 of 36
Appearing:

The jury views 34 Fairview Road as the prosecution establishes Karen Read's blood alcohol level and paramedic Jason Becker's account of her demeanor and statements becomes the day's central dispute.

Full day summary

Day 4 opened with the jury's view of 34 Fairview Road, where prosecution and defense used their view openings to direct jurors toward competing physical details of the scene. Dr. Gary Faller, pathology chief at Good Samaritan Medical Center, then established the chain of custody and result of Karen Read's hospital blood alcohol test — 93 mg/dL — before defense attorney Elizabeth Little challenged the reliability of the clinical enzymatic method on cross and Lally rehabilitated it on redirect with a study of MS patients and proficiency testing data. Canton Fire paramedic Jason Becker testified about transporting Read to Good Samaritan on the morning of January 29, 2022, describing her as agitated but cooperative, and noting she referenced an argument as her last interaction with John O'Keefe. The remainder of the day was consumed by a four-round battle over what Read meant by 'last words' — defense attorney Jackson establishing through Becker's own testimony that Read showed him missed calls on her phone, while prosecutor Brennan anchored all three of Becker's prior statements to the word 'argument' with no mention of voicemails.

  • The jury views 34 Fairview Road, with both sides directing attention to competing physical features of the scene including the Lexus's bumper height, the removed tail light, distances between landmarks, and the second-floor window.
  • Dr. Gary Faller establishes Karen Read's blood alcohol result of 93 mg/dL and the full chain of custody, from non-alcohol swab protocol through the Roche Cobas analysis.
  • Elizabeth Little cross-examines Faller, eliciting that the hospital's test measures NADH rather than ethanol directly and that the lab holds clinical — not forensic — accreditation, and that the witness's MS and anemia were not considered.
  • Paramedic Becker testifies that Read's demeanor was consistent with significant trauma and that she referenced an argument as her last communication with O'Keefe while simultaneously showing him missed calls on her phone.
  • Prosecution and defense spend three examination rounds contesting whether Read's 'last words' referred to an in-person argument or phone-based voicemails, with Becker's grand jury statement — 'the last time they had talked she had gotten into an argument' — read into the record.
Gary Faller
“Correct. And that's because lactic acid or LDH actually forms NADH.”
Faller's concession is the scientific core of the defense's blood alcohol challenge — establishing that the hospital's method measures NADH rather than ethanol and that conditions Read had could produce NADH independent of alcohol.
Jason Becker
“Her demeanor was consistent with having gone through a significant trauma for the situation.”
The first responder's neutral characterization of Read's state as consistent with significant trauma rather than guilt or evasion is among the most consequential observations of the day.
Jason Becker
“Uh, so she — she was also um — she was upset also because she said they had, you know, the last time they had talked she had gotten into an argument. So she was upset that that was like her last words to him.”
Becker reading his full grand jury statement aloud — describing Read's upset over an argument as 'her last words to him' with no mention of voicemails — is the prosecution's anchor against the defense's phone-based reframing.

Procedural - Viewing Openings

Court prepares for and conducts a jury view of 34 Fairview Road in Canton, with both attorneys directing jurors on what to observe at the scene.

Procedural
Procedural - View Openings
20 utt.

Judge Cannone instructs the jury on the purpose and rules of the view at 34 Fairview Road — they may use their observations in deliberations but cannot take notes, photographs, or conduct independent investigation. ADA Brennan directs the jury to observe the street, front yard, the defendant's Lexus (noting the removed right rear tail light, bumper height, and a hatchback protrusion), the flagpole, and the fire hydrant, while cautioning that weather and visibility conditions differ from January 29, 2022. Defense attorney Yannetti asks the jury to observe the house's second floor window, three front doors, the driveway, distances between key features, and to stand next to the Lexus to assess its size. Court officers are sworn in and the jury departs for the view, returning approximately 90 minutes later.

+1 procedural segment

Gary Faller - Direct/Cross/Redirect

Dr. Gary Faller testifies about Karen Read's blood alcohol test (93 mg/dL) and laboratory procedures. The defense questions the methodology; the prosecution addresses concerns in redirect.

Direct
Gary Faller Adam Lally
131 utt.

ADA Adam Lally calls Dr. Gary Faller, now chief of pathology at Signature Healthcare in Brockton and formerly in the same role at Good Samaritan Medical Center. Lally walks Faller through his credentials (Tufts-trained, board certified in anatomic and clinical pathology) and the CAP accreditation of Good Samaritan's laboratory. Faller explains the full chain of custody for blood alcohol testing — from phlebotomist protocols (non-alcohol swabs, bedside labeling, competency requirements) through centrifugation and analysis on the Roche Cobas machine. He testifies that Karen Read's blood was ordered at 9:03 a.m. on January 29, 2022, drawn at 9:08, received by the lab at 9:13, and resulted at 9:53, with a blood alcohol reading of 93 milligrams per deciliter.

Cross
Gary Faller Elizabeth Little
102 utt.

Elizabeth Little cross-examines Dr. Gary Faller, establishing that Good Samaritan's lab holds clinical but not forensic accreditation and has never been evaluated by a forensic accreditation body. She walks Faller through the distinction between forensic headspace gas chromatography (which directly measures ethanol in whole blood) and the hospital's serum test (which measures the rate of NADH production as a proxy for alcohol). Faller acknowledges that elevated LDH and lactic acid can produce false positive readings, and that conditions including liver disease, kidney disease, muscle injury, trauma, and anemia can elevate LDH. Little asks whether Faller considered Karen Read's anemia and multiple sclerosis when conducting the test; he confirms the lab does not consider patient medical history. She closes by noting all other drug tests on Read were negative.

Redirect
Gary Faller Adam Lally
27 utt.

ADA Adam Lally conducts redirect examination of Dr. Gary Faller to address issues raised during Elizabeth Little's cross-examination. Lally first elicits testimony about the mathematical conversion from serum to whole-blood alcohol readings, with Faller explaining the conversion factor ranges from 1.1 to 1.18 (meaning serum results run 11-18% higher than whole blood). Lally then has Faller address the MS-related interference concern by referencing a study of 600 MS patients across three European centers, which found that even the highest lactic acid levels in symptomatic MS patients did not reach the threshold required to produce a false positive on the Roche testing system. Faller reiterates that Karen Read's test showed no flags for hemolysis, icterus, or lipemia. Finally, Lally has Faller testify about CAP proficiency testing, where Faller states that approximately 3,000 labs using the same enzymatic methodology produce consistent results, and that these results match those from labs using forensic headspace gas chromatography. Little declines recross.

Jason Becker - Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross

Jason Becker, a Canton Fire Department paramedic, testified about responding to Karen Read on January 29, 2022, and transporting her for psychiatric evaluation. The proceedings focus on disputed testimony about Read's statement regarding an argument with her husband — whether she meant an actual confrontation or references to voicemails and missed calls on her phone.

Direct
Jason Becker Hank Brennan
189 utt.

Jason Becker, a Canton Fire Department firefighter paramedic, testified about his background in EMT and paramedic training before joining the Canton Fire Department. He described being dispatched from Station 2 with partner Dan Whitley to 34 Fairview Road for a Section 12 psychiatric evaluation call in the early morning of January 29, 2022, arriving after an extended 8-10 minute drive through heavy snow and low visibility. Becker found Karen Read in the front passenger seat of a black SUV with another person driving, conducted initial triage questions, and transported her to Good Samaritan Hospital's psychiatric section. He described Read's demeanor as fluctuating between agitated and calm, with pressured and repetitive speech, though ultimately cooperative. Read told Becker her last conversation with her husband had been an argument but provided no details about its content.

Cross
Jason Becker Alan Jackson
177 utt.

Alan Jackson established that Karen Read displayed signs consistent with significant trauma when Becker encountered her, including rapid and repetitive speech, fluctuating between calm and agitated states. Jackson confirmed Read was cooperative throughout transport, never combative, and that the blood on her face was consistent with her account of performing CPR. The core focus was on Read's statement about an argument — Jackson used Becker's own report and prior grand jury testimony to establish that Read described 'her last words to him' from 'earlier in the night,' and that she simultaneously showed Becker missed calls on her phone. Becker acknowledged putting the two together: Read's upset about her 'last words' referred to angry voicemails left via those missed calls, not an in-person argument.

Redirect
Jason Becker Hank Brennan
94 utt.

Hank Brennan used redirect to neutralize the defense's suggestion during cross that Karen Read's reference to 'last words' meant angry voicemails rather than an in-person argument. Brennan walked Becker through his original report, his grand jury testimony from April 21, 2022, and his May 3, 2024 testimony, establishing that Becker consistently used the word 'argument' and that Read never mentioned voicemails or voice messages. Becker read his full grand jury statement aloud: Read was upset because 'the last time they had talked she had gotten into an argument' and 'that was like her last words to him.' Brennan also elicited context about Kerry Roberts being identified through a conversation between Read and firefighter Whitley about caring for the children. Becker explained he did not ask Read for more details about the argument because the crew's focus was supporting her and transporting her safely to the hospital.

Recross
Jason Becker Alan Jackson
17 utt.

In a brief recross of 17 utterances, Alan Jackson addressed two points raised during Hank Brennan's redirect. First, Jackson established that Brennan's framing of 'earlier in the night' as 12:00 or 12:15 a.m. was not the only interpretation — Becker agreed the phrase could equally refer to 5:00, 6:00, or 7:00 p.m. Second, Jackson returned to the phone issue: while Becker confirmed Read did not specifically mention voicemails, he acknowledged she attempted to show him her phone with missed calls. Jackson then connected the phone display to Read's statement about her 'last words' being the argument, though the judge sustained an objection and instructed jurors to disregard his final characterization.

+1 procedural segment
◀ Day 3 Trial 2 Day 5 ▶