Trial 2 Transcript Shanon Burgess
Trial 2 / Day 19 / May 20, 2025
4 pages · 2 witnesses · 1,770 lines
The Burgess examination concludes in a credibility battle over a fictitious degree on a federal court filing, before forensic glass analyst Christina Hanley begins testimony linking scene glass to a broken drinking cup.
1 5:41:29

MR. ALESSI: Thank you, your honor.

2 5:41:31
3 5:41:31

MR. ALESSI: Thank you, Mr. Burgess. Between the time you left the witness stand yesterday until this moment, have you talked to anyone about this case?

4 5:41:41

MS. BURGESS: No, sir. I have not.

5 5:41:43

MR. ALESSI: Has a filing ever been made in any court in which your educational background has been misrepresented?

6 5:47:49

MS. BURGESS: No. Not that I'm aware of.

7 5:47:56

MR. ALESSI: Pardon me?

8 5:47:59

MS. BURGESS: Not that I'm aware of.

9 5:48:06

MR. ALESSI: Did I understand that you're based out of the Aperture office in Texas?

10 5:48:12

MS. BURGESS: Yes, I am.

11 5:48:13

MR. ALESSI: And are you aware of a case in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, titled Jeffrey Glover and Teresa Glover versus Graphic Packaging International LLC? Are you familiar with that case?

12 5:48:30

MS. BURGESS: Yes, I am.

13 5:48:31

MR. ALESSI: And is it correct that in that case — well, tell me how you are participating in that case, sir.

14 5:48:40

MS. BURGESS: So I'm no longer participating in that case. If I recall correctly, that would have been an accident reconstruction case — I don't recall — a year or two ago.

15 5:48:54

MR. ALESSI: And so it was a case that you did participate in, correct?

16 5:49:00

MS. BURGESS: Yes, I did.

17 5:49:03

MR. ALESSI: And what was your role in that case?

18 5:49:11

MS. BURGESS: Sure. So my role in that case was as an accident reconstructionist.

19 5:49:23

MR. ALESSI: And did you provide any testimony, deposition or otherwise, in that case?

20 5:49:35

MS. BURGESS: No, I did not.

21 5:49:39

MR. ALESSI: Did you — in that particular case, there were, like all cases, filings made?

22 5:49:53

MS. BURGESS: Correct. I'm sure there were. Yes.

23 5:49:59

MR. ALESSI: May I approach, your honor?

24 5:50:04
25 5:50:05

MR. ALESSI: I would like to have a document marked as the next exhibit for identification.

26 5:50:19

JUDGE CANNONE: Please. EE for ID.

27 5:50:23

MR. ALESSI: May I present to the witness, your honor?

28 5:50:31
29 5:50:32

MR. ALESSI: Thank you, Mr. Burgess. I am showing you a document which has been marked as Exhibit EE for identification, and I'd ask that you take a look at it. Your honor, may I remain here?

30 5:51:07

JUDGE CANNONE: Sure. As long as you stand back a little bit.

31 5:51:11

MR. ALESSI: Yes. Thank you.

32 5:51:12

JUDGE CANNONE: Even farther.

33 5:51:13

MR. ALESSI: Yes, Mr. Burgess. With regard to Exhibit EE, do you recognize the second page, and do you recognize any stamping at the top of each of those pages?

34 5:51:26

MS. BURGESS: Yes, I do.

35 5:51:28

MR. ALESSI: And can you describe what that stamping is?

36 5:51:31

MS. BURGESS: Sure. So that is a stamping for a file date of 8/7/203.

37 5:51:37

MR. ALESSI: And is that a stamping of a federal court?

38 5:51:41

MS. BURGESS: That I'm not sure.

39 5:51:43

MR. ALESSI: If I were to show you a document, might a document refresh your recollection as to whether Exhibit EE is a filing in a federal court?

40 5:51:54
41 5:51:55

MR. ALESSI: May I, your honor?

42 5:51:57
43 5:51:57

MR. ALESSI: I am showing you —

44 5:52:00

JUDGE CANNONE: Did you show those to Mr. Brennan?

45 5:52:03

MR. ALESSI: I believe I did, but I want to make sure. Just let me know if we need to move.

46 5:52:11

JUDGE CANNONE: We will. Can I mark each of these for identification?

47 5:52:16

COURT CLERK: Yep. Let me just get one first. Let me see if this is the second page for that. It is. So it can be marked as one document. FF — here you go, sir.

48 5:52:32

MR. ALESSI: I am showing you what has been marked as Exhibit FF for identification, and ask whether or not this document can refresh your recollection as to whether the court filing that you reviewed in Exhibit EE is indeed a federal court.

49 5:53:14

MS. BURGESS: Yes, it is.

50 5:53:17

MR. ALESSI: So that document refreshes your recollection that what has been filed as represented in EE is a filing in a federal court.

51 5:53:40

MS. BURGESS: Correct, sir. Correct.

52 5:53:41

MR. ALESSI: Now, what I'd like to do is to draw your attention to the second page of this exhibit. Is that a curriculum vitae of you and a picture of you?

53 5:53:53

MS. BURGESS: Yes, it is.

54 5:53:54

MR. ALESSI: And sir, under "Education" —

55 5:53:56

MR. BRENNAN: Objection.

56 5:53:56

JUDGE CANNONE: The objection is sustained. Do you want to bring it over?

57 5:54:01

MR. ALESSI: I will, your honor. I will.

58 5:54:03

JUDGE CANNONE: Feel free to stand up and stretch.

59 5:54:06

MR. ALESSI: May I approach, your honor?

60 5:54:08
61 5:54:08

MR. ALESSI: Thank you, Mr. Burgess. I'm going to have to be a little close in proximity. Bear with me, please. What I would like to do, sir, is to put before you again Exhibit FF for identification and Exhibit EE for identification, and I would like to ask you some questions with regard to the process in the case. Okay. Are you aware, or do you recall, in this litigation that, as is typical in civil litigation including federal courts, as part of the litigation process the parties have to designate their expert witnesses? Are you aware generally of that process?

62 5:58:49

MS. BURGESS: Generally, yes.

63 5:58:51

MR. ALESSI: And have you participated in the documents that need to be prepared for an attorney or a party to prepare documents and submit them to a court to establish the designation of expert witnesses?

64 5:59:37

MS. BURGESS: No, I have not.

65 5:59:38

MR. ALESSI: And so you have never participated or never been aware of a process like this?

66 5:59:44

MS. BURGESS: No, I'm aware of a process. And that process goes through other staff members.

67 5:59:49

MR. ALESSI: Okay. So it goes through other staff members where?

68 5:59:52

MS. BURGESS: At Aperture.

69 5:59:53

MR. ALESSI: Correct. Are you aware that that process is occurring, even though it may be done by other staff at Aperture?

70 6:00:00

MS. BURGESS: Yes, I am.

71 6:00:01

MR. ALESSI: And in this instance, you were aware in this litigation that staff at Aperture needed to submit documents in support of an expert witness designation?

72 6:00:11

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

73 6:00:11

MR. ALESSI: Even though you may not have done it yourself, you were aware that some person or persons at Aperture were performing that process?

74 6:00:20

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

75 6:00:20

MR. ALESSI: And they were performing that process so that you could be designated as an expert witness in that case?

76 6:00:29

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

77 6:00:29

MR. ALESSI: And so you were aware of the process. You were aware they had to submit documents that would establish your qualifications as an expert in the case so that you could be designated as an expert witness.

78 6:00:46

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

79 6:00:46

MR. ALESSI: And now specifically with regard to Exhibit EE for identification — with these court filings — even though you may not have done it yourself, were you aware that this document, which is EE, was submitted as part of the expert designation process we were talking about?

80 6:01:08

MS. BURGESS: Not this specific document. No.

81 6:01:10

MR. ALESSI: Were you aware that a CV was needed to be submitted on your behalf as part of the designation process?

82 6:01:19
83 6:01:20

MR. ALESSI: So you were aware a CV had to be submitted, but you're saying you don't recall this specific one being submitted.

84 6:01:29

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

85 6:01:30

MR. ALESSI: Does the timestamp at the top of each page of Exhibit EE — including this page that is your CV — match the timestamp, or is it different from the timestamp at the top of Exhibit FF?

86 6:01:47

MS. BURGESS: No, that is the same.

87 6:01:49

MR. ALESSI: So it's exactly the same.

88 6:01:51
89 6:01:52

MR. ALESSI: And have you been involved in processes in courts where your qualifications, including your CV, have had to be submitted to courts to

90 6:02:03

MR. ALESSI: establish a designation as an expert witness?

91 6:02:06
92 6:02:07

MR. ALESSI: And can you conclude from these documents, including the timestamps, that the submission that was made to the court to establish your status as an expert witness consisted of exhibits E and FF?

93 6:02:24

MR. BRENNAN: Objection.

94 6:02:25

JUDGE CANNONE: I'm going to allow that. Were you aware of that?

95 6:02:30
96 6:02:31

MR. ALESSI: Your honor, at this point, I move E and FF into evidence.

97 6:02:37

JUDGE CANNONE: Yeah, you need one more step, Mr. Alessi.

98 6:02:41

MR. ALESSI: And sir, do E and FF fairly and accurately represent the submission of documents in support of a designation of expert witness in this case?

99 6:02:55

MS. BURGESS: Yes, as far as I can tell.

100 6:02:59

MR. ALESSI: Your honor, I offer these two into evidence.

101 6:03:03

JUDGE CANNONE: I'm going to allow it.

102 6:03:06

JUDGE CANNONE: Yes. Come on up. Please.

103 6:03:15

MR. ALESSI: Yes, your honor. May I reapproach, your honor?

104 6:03:30
105 6:03:32

MR. ALESSI: I'm going to have to stand here and reach in for this. So, what I would like to do, your honor, at this time is to offer into evidence exhibit E and exhibit FF for identification as one exhibit — as one exhibit.

106 6:04:52

JUDGE CANNONE: All right, we'll do that. That will be exhibit 193. Thank you.

107 6:05:14

MR. ALESSI: May I hand to the —

108 6:05:26

JUDGE CANNONE: Yes, Mr. Burgess.

109 6:05:31

MR. ALESSI: I am handing you what is now in evidence as exhibit 193. I would like to draw your attention to the fourth page, which is your CV, and further, if I could, sir, draw your attention to the category of education where it says BGS. Is it correct that there you state

110 6:07:09

MR. ALESSI: Bachelor of General Science in Mathematics and Business Administration, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Alabama, 2024. Did I read that correctly?

111 6:07:18

MS. BURGESS: You did read that correctly.

112 6:07:20

MR. ALESSI: And this was filed in 2023.

113 6:07:23

MS. BURGESS: Understood.

114 6:07:24

MR. ALESSI: So now what I'd like to do, your honor — ma'am, keep this for a moment, your honor. Give it to the witnesses as needed. Thank you. With your honor's permission, I would like to publish a document that is already in evidence.

115 6:07:45
116 6:07:45

MR. ALESSI: Actually, there may be two, 183 and 184. Let's start with 183. Let's expand it. And then, Mr. Woll, do we have what has just been — to publish as well? So what I'd like to do is to

117 6:08:05

MR. ALESSI: publish first, with the court's permission, exhibit 193 that we were just talking about, so the jury can see what has been the subject of discussion. And sir — Mr. Woll, if you could just enlarge, all we need is the education section. Now, Mr. Burgess, as I heard it correctly in questions from Mr. Brennan, you answered the question of whether you had ever filed a document that misstated your educational background in a court. Do you recall that question asked of you?

118 6:08:41

MS. BURGESS: Yes, I did.

119 6:08:43

MR. ALESSI: And your answer was no.

120 6:08:45

MS. BURGESS: Correct, sir.

121 6:08:46

MR. ALESSI: So let's look at this document, which we've just gone through, was filed in federal court in the United States

122 6:08:55

MR. ALESSI: District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division — which is a federal court — and attached to it is your CV, and in the line of education it lists, under BGS, Bachelor of General Science in Mathematics and Business Administration, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Alabama, 2024. You see that, sir?

123 6:09:21

MS. BURGESS: I do. Yes.

124 6:09:23

MR. ALESSI: Now, you stated — and now what I'd like to do — is there any qualification whatsoever in that line? Any reference to BGS qualifications, any explanation, sir? Is there anything?

125 6:09:39

MS. BURGESS: I don't know what you mean. It's just a statement, right? There — there's words there. There's nothing after it

126 6:09:50

MS. BURGESS: that explains what's intended.

127 6:09:52

MR. ALESSI: Correct.

128 6:09:53

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

129 6:09:53

MR. ALESSI: Now, what I'd like to do, your honor, is to go to what was filed in this case, which is in evidence, and we'll go to 183 and then 184. Now, in what has been filed in this case, there is "currently pursuing" at the end, after "University of Alabama-Birmingham, Alabama."

130 6:10:27

MS. BURGESS: Correct. Yes, that's correct.

131 6:10:30

MR. ALESSI: Let's go back, please, to exhibit 193. There is no "currently pursuing" there — is there, sir?

132 6:10:41

MS. BURGESS: There is not, but that was filed in 2023. So that would be an expected graduation date of 2024.

133 6:10:53

MR. ALESSI: Okay. So this document was filed in 2023. However, there's nothing in this document that in any way leads the

134 6:11:07

MR. ALESSI: reader to believe anything other than that the degree was obtained in 2024.

135 6:11:15

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

136 6:11:16

MR. ALESSI: Correct. So the only way somebody in the court system — a judge or a jury — would know anything about this is to have to know about court filing dates.

137 6:11:37

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

138 6:11:37

MR. ALESSI: I'll ask it another way. Mr. Burgess, you know how to write. Let's go back to 183 and 184. You know how to write "currently pursuing" on your CV.

139 6:11:57

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

140 6:11:57

MR. ALESSI: And writing "currently pursuing" lets the reader know that you don't have that degree. Correct?

141 6:12:07

MR. BRENNAN: Objection in that form.

142 6:12:10

JUDGE CANNONE: Sustained.

143 6:12:11

MR. ALESSI: You intend by writing "currently pursuing," don't you, sir, for anybody who reads this to know that you do

144 6:12:24

MR. ALESSI: not have a bachelor's degree. Correct?

145 6:12:38

MR. BRENNAN: Objection in that form.

146 6:12:48

JUDGE CANNONE: Sustained.

147 6:12:51

MR. ALESSI: You intend by writing "currently pursuing," don't you, sir, that anybody who reads this — to know that you do

148 6:13:41

MR. ALESSI: not have a bachelor's degree.

149 6:13:43

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

150 6:13:44

MR. ALESSI: Correct. And the last time I'll cover it — you know how to put "currently pursuing" on anything to do with a bachelor of science.

151 6:13:56

MS. BURGESS: Correct.

152 6:13:57

MR. ALESSI: A bachelor of general science in mathematics and business administration does not exist as an offered degree at the University of Alabama-Birmingham. Does it?

153 6:14:09

MS. BURGESS: Sure. So that is an error. Clearly, BGS stands for bachelor of general studies, and that should have "with minor in mathematics and business administration."

154 6:14:22

MR. ALESSI: That is a known acronym.

155 6:14:40

MR. ALESSI: Let's go back to "Bachelor of General Science in Mathematics and Business Administration." That degree does not exist. It is not offered at the University of Alabama-Birmingham.

156 6:15:06

MS. BURGESS: Correct. No, there is not.

157 6:15:10

MR. ALESSI: So therefore, an incorrect statement about your educational background was filed in a federal court in Texas.

158 6:15:26

MS. BURGESS: Correct. Yes, it was.

159 6:15:30

JUDGE CANNONE: That's it, Mr. Alessi?

160 6:15:34

JUDGE CANNONE: Okay. Is there anything?

161 6:15:38

MR. BRENNAN: There is.

162 6:15:40
163 6:15:41

MR. BRENNAN: The document that the attorney just showed you — did you submit that to the federal court?

164 6:15:47

MS. BURGESS: No, I did not.

165 6:15:48

MR. BRENNAN: Did you ever see that document before it was filed?

166 6:15:52

MS. BURGESS: No, I did not.

167 6:15:53

MR. BRENNAN: The document says 2024 for a degree. Is there a presumption about whether you had it or expected it, if that document was filed in 2023?

168 6:16:03

MS. BURGESS: Yes, there is.

169 6:16:04

MR. BRENNAN: And what is the presumption if it was filed in 2023?

170 6:16:08

MR. ALESSI: Objection, your honor.

171 6:16:09

JUDGE CANNONE: Sustained. Strike.

172 6:16:10

MR. BRENNAN: He asked if there was any designation to make it clear — if it says 2024, if it was filed in 2023 and it says 2024, what was your expectation at that time as far as your degree?

173 6:16:24

MS. BURGESS: That I would complete my degree in 2024.

174 6:16:27

MR. BRENNAN: When you didn't complete your degree in 2024 as you expected, did you then change your CV?

175 6:16:33

MS. BURGESS: Yes, I did.

176 6:16:34

MR. BRENNAN: To accurately reflect the change in your status?

177 6:16:37

MS. BURGESS: Yes, I did.

178 6:16:38

MR. BRENNAN: And what did you change it to?

179 6:16:41

MS. BURGESS: Currently pursuing.

180 6:16:42

MR. BRENNAN: Why didn't you finish your degree in 2024?

181 6:16:45

JUDGE CANNONE: No, I'm going to allow it.

182 6:16:47

MS. BURGESS: As most people can probably relate, work, family, and life many times get in the way. So, as a personal objective, I would like to finish my bachelor's, but again, work and life gets in the way.

183 6:17:00

MR. BRENNAN: Did you ever represent to a court that you had a degree that you didn't earn?

184 6:17:06

MS. BURGESS: No, I have not.

185 6:17:08

MR. BRENNAN: He asked you a number of questions about this 2023 filing, but didn't ask you any questions about the data. Did your opinion regarding the data change in any way in light of his questions about a 2023 filing that you didn't file

186 6:17:24

MR. BRENNAN: and someone filed on your behalf?

187 6:17:29

MR. ALESSI: Objection.

188 6:17:30

JUDGE CANNONE: Sustained. Strike that question.

189 6:17:34

MR. BRENNAN: No further questions.

190 6:17:37

JUDGE CANNONE: All right, Mr. Burgess, you are all set. Thank you.

191 6:17:46

JUDGE CANNONE: Where's my Mr. Woll?

Procedural Procedural - Clips
192 6:17:50

MR. LALLY: I'd like to play a number of clips. If I could begin with clip 23. clip playback

193 6:18:06

VIDEO PLAYBACK: So, we approach from the north. We actually missed the turn, and John says to me, "It's Fairview. We just passed it. It's back there. It's on my left." I said, "All right." So I pull in — nose into a driveway, back out onto the street, which I now know was Cedarcrest, and then you come from the north onto Fairview.

194 6:19:04

MR. LALLY: I'd like to play clip 25. clip playback

195 6:19:12

VIDEO PLAYBACK: At 12:41, I leave a voicemail to John, and you can clearly — and this will probably be played on Monday — you can clearly hear me pull into John's garage. You can hear my car sensors beeping as I come close to the side of the garage. And then you hear the car go off, and then you hear the [unintelligible] ding ding as I open the door, shut the door. I had high heels on at night. You hear me walk in, go into the stairs, up into the kitchen, shut the door. You hear me walk in the kitchen. It's like a full minute long. That's at 12:41.

196 6:19:50

MR. LALLY: And finally, clip 24. clip playback

197 6:19:52

VIDEO PLAYBACK: I do. I do. I mean, I'll tell you. Um, John and I argue the morning of the 28th, Friday morning. So, he died — we think he died right around 12:25, 12:30 on the early morning of January 29th.

198 6:20:07

MR. LALLY: Thank you. I have these for submission into evidence — 194.

199 6:20:19

JUDGE CANNONE: Yes, sir.