Day 5 - May 6, 2024
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 1 · 12 proceedings · 2,741 utterances
Defense exposes evidence collection failures and police conflicts of interest, as Lt. Gallagher and Sgt. Goode face cross-examination over contaminated blood evidence and scene preservation failures, while voir dire of Sgt. Lank surfaces his decades-long ties to the Albert family.
Full day summary
Key Moments
- Defense establishes that blood evidence from the scene was collected in unsterilized Red Solo cups borrowed from a neighbor, transported in a Stop & Shop bag, and stored unsealed next to Karen Read's SUV in the Canton PD sallyport for three days before state police processing.
- Sgt. Goode testifies that during his one hour and forty minutes at 34 Fairview Road he never once heard Karen Read say 'I hit him' — directly contradicting prosecution witnesses from Day 4.
- No taillight pieces, shoe, or hat were found during the initial thorough search of 34 Fairview Road, raising the defense's implicit question of when and how those items later appeared.
- Defense voir dire of Sgt. Lank reveals a 2002 incident in which Lank activated himself as an officer to assist Chris Albert in a street altercation, then later arrested the opposing parties for witness intimidation — charges ultimately dismissed as meritless.
- Judge Cannone rejects the prosecution's relevance objection and signals she will allow Lank's Albert family bias evidence before the jury, ruling the Albert connection is the key factor making it admissible.
Notable Quotes
Alan Jackson
“So what you did instead was you gathered red Solo cups from a neighbor, unsterilized, and scooped up the snow with what you thought was blood, and just carried them back to the truck?”
Jackson's summary of the blood collection method — Solo cups from a neighbor, a grocery bag, stored beside Read's vehicle — encapsulates the defense's contamination theory in a single image that the jury would carry out of the courtroom.
Sean Goode
“While you were on scene at 34 Fairview for an hour and 40 minutes, did you ever once hear Karen Read say, 'I hit him, I hit him, I hit him, I hit him'? — I did not.”
Goode's flat denial that he ever heard the 'I hit him' statement is the day's most consequential factual contradiction, coming from the first officer to interact with Read at the scene.
Alan Jackson
“Isn't it true that what you actually did, Sergeant Lank, in that particular circumstance was you came to the aid of a friend and you used your position as a police officer to further that assistance and that protection?”
Jackson's closing voir dire question to Lank distills the defense's theory of the entire investigation — that officers with personal ties to the Alberts used their authority to protect that family at Read's expense.
Sean Goode - Direct
Dispatch Sergeant Sean Goode recounts the 911 calls reporting a man found at 34 Fairview Road and his investigation of the scene on the morning of January 29, 2022.
+1 procedural segment