Day 11 - May 7, 2025
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 2 · 7 proceedings · 1,489 utterances
Digital forensics expert Jessica Hyde testifies that the 'how long to die in cold' search occurred at 6:24 a.m., not 2:27 a.m. — then faces a methodical cross-examination exposing inconsistencies in her prior reports and best-practice failures in evidence collection.
Full day summary
Key Moments
- Yannetti establishes through Keefe that Michael Proctor wrote all investigative reports and controlled all analytical work, including video surveillance analysis and interview reports, without input from assisting troopers.
- Judge Cannone excludes the Maryland Daubert ruling that would have impeached Hyde's prior exclusion in another jurisdiction, preserving only the defense's right to cross-examine on methodology.
- Hyde testifies to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty that the 'how long to die in cold' search occurred at 6:24 a.m. and was not user-deleted — the prosecution's core digital forensics claim.
- Alessi confronts Hyde with her own 2023 report calling the 2:27 timestamp reason 'unknown' and her 2024 testimony that the artifact 'cannot tell' when the search occurred, exposing the evolution of her conclusions.
- Hyde concedes that O'Keefe's phone was not placed in airplane mode or a Faraday bag from 6:04 a.m. through at least noon on January 29, 2022, in violation of the best practices she herself described.
Notable Quotes
Jessica Hyde
“What I can state to a scientific degree of certainty is that that search occurred at 6:24 a.m. and was the last search in the tab that had been opened at 2:27.”
Hyde's definitive 6:24 a.m. opinion is the prosecution's central digital forensics claim and the direct target of everything the defense builds toward on cross.
Jessica Hyde
“We cannot tell by this particular artifact what time that search occurred.”
Hyde's own sworn testimony from June 2024 — that the browser state artifact cannot determine when the search occurred — is the sharpest contradiction of her current definitive opinion, and the defense's most effective impeachment of the day.
Jessica Hyde
“Correct. It is not in accordance with best practices. I agree.”
Hyde's concession that O'Keefe's phone was never properly secured undercuts the integrity of all phone evidence in the case and lands as the cross-examination's lasting structural point.