Trial 2 Trial Day
Trial 2 Day 2 ▶

Day 1 - April 22, 2025

Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 2 · 11 proceedings · 1,933 utterances

Day 1 of 36
Appearing:

Trial 2 opens with competing opening statements and the first witness battle over Karen Read's 'I hit him' statement to a first responder at the scene.

Full day summary

Trial 2 of Commonwealth v. Karen Read commenced with jury instructions, administration of the oath, and reading of the three indictments — second-degree murder, OUI manslaughter, and leaving the scene. ADA Hank Brennan delivered the prosecution's opening, anchoring its theory in digital evidence — cell phone location data, health app readings, battery temperature, and black box data — alongside Read's own statements at the scene and to friends that morning. Alan Jackson countered with the defense's central thesis: no collision occurred, the investigation was corrupted by lead investigator Michael Proctor's personal ties to the Albert family, and the Commonwealth's own medical examiner would not rule the death a homicide. The day's most contested testimony came from firefighter-paramedic Tim Nuttall, whose account of hearing Read say 'I hit him' was subjected to four rounds of examination, revealing inconsistencies between his Trial 1 and Trial 2 accounts, contradictions with Trooper Proctor's early report, and positioning questions raised by dash cam video. The day closed with the beginning of Kerry Roberts's testimony, which introduced Read's predawn calls declaring 'John's dead,' her admission of a memory blackout from heavy drinking, and a disputed exchange between Read and Jennifer McCabe about where O'Keefe had been left.

  • ADA Brennan opened by building the prosecution's case around digital evidence — Waze data, phone battery temperature, and black box readings — rather than eyewitness testimony of a collision.
  • Alan Jackson's defense opening directly challenged the Commonwealth's theory three times in succession — 'There was no collision. There was no collision. There was no collision.' — and previewed evidence of investigative corruption by Michael Proctor and third-party involvement by the Albert household.
  • Tim Nuttall testified that Karen Read said 'I hit him' three times at the scene, but Jackson exposed that Nuttall testified to hearing it only twice at Trial 1 and could not place Read near him during the window he described, as shown by dash cam video.
  • Jackson revealed that Trooper Proctor's February 8, 2022 report recorded a materially different version of the 'I hit him' statement — overheard by Read to another woman, not directed at Nuttall — which Nuttall was unable to reconcile with his current account.
  • Kerry Roberts testified that Read called her at 5:00 a.m. screaming 'John's dead' before the body was found, and that Read admitted drinking so heavily she could not remember anything from the prior night.
Alan Jackson
“There was no collision with John O'Keefe. There was no collision. There was no collision. John O'Keefe did not die from being hit by a vehicle. Period.”
Jackson's triple repetition of 'there was no collision' in the opening moments of the defense statement established the thesis around which all defense evidence and cross-examination on Day 1 was organized.
Hank Brennan
“That cell phone — it is the best of historians. It doesn't suffer from intoxication. It doesn't suffer from memory loss. It doesn't suffer from emotion, pride, or bias.”
Brennan's framing of cell phone data as a witness immune to intoxication and memory loss previewed the prosecution's strategy of substituting digital evidence for the unreliable human witnesses the defense spent the day attacking.
Kerry Roberts
“Karen called and — the first thing she said was, 'Kerry, Kerry, Kerry, John's dead.' And then she hung up.”
Read's predawn call declaring 'John's dead' before the body was discovered was the most dramatic moment of Roberts's testimony and the clearest illustration of the prosecution's prior-knowledge theory.

Procedural - Jury Instructions

Judge Cannone delivers preliminary jury instructions for Trial 2, covering charges, burden of proof, courtroom procedures, and admonitions about media and public interest.

Procedural
Procedural - Jury Instructions
46 utt.

Judge Cannone opens Trial 2 by having counsel identify themselves for the record: ADA Lally and ADA Brennan for the Commonwealth, and attorneys Jackson, Little, Alessi, and Yannetti for the defense. After confirming jurors followed prior instructions, the judge administers the jury oath and the clerk reads the three indictments: second-degree murder, manslaughter while OUI, and leaving the scene causing death. Judge Cannone then delivers extensive preliminary instructions covering the presumption of innocence, proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the roles of judge and jury, rules about evidence and objections, note-taking, implicit bias, and strict admonitions against outside research, social media use, and public commentary about the case.

+1 procedural segment

Opening Statement - Commonwealth

Prosecutor Hank Brennan delivers the Commonwealth's opening statement, outlining the timeline of John O'Keefe's death and the evidence against Karen Read.

Opening
Opening Statement - Hank Brennan Hank Brennan
38 utt.

ADA Hank Brennan presents the prosecution's theory of the case: that Karen Read, after a night of heavy drinking and arguing with John O'Keefe, struck him with her Lexus SUV in reverse outside 34 Fairview Road in Canton on January 29, 2022, then drove away, leaving him to die in near-blizzard conditions. Brennan walks the jury through the timeline using cell phone location data (Waze), health data, battery temperature readings, and the vehicle's black box. He describes the first responders' arrival, Read's statements at the scene ('I hit him'), the broken tail light evidence, and Read's conflicting accounts to friends that morning. Brennan previews expert testimony from a neurosurgeon on O'Keefe's skull fracture and an accident reconstructionist, and plays a post-charge media clip in which Read speculates she may have 'clipped' O'Keefe.

Opening Statement - Defense

Defense attorney Alan Jackson delivers his opening statement, asserting there was no vehicle collision and framing the case as a corrupted investigation driven by lead investigator Michael Proctor's ties to the Albert family.

Opening
Opening Statement - Alan Jackson Alan Jackson
60 utt.

Alan Jackson opened the defense case by establishing three core themes: no vehicle collision occurred, the investigation was corrupted by lead investigator Michael Proctor's personal ties to the Albert family, and the physical and medical evidence contradicts the Commonwealth's theory. Jackson walked the jury through the timeline of January 28-29, 2022, highlighting suspicious post-incident conduct by Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, and Jennifer McCabe — including late-night phone calls, a 2:27 a.m. Google search for 'hos long to die in cold,' and subsequent destruction of phones and sale of the Albert home. He previewed defense expert testimony that John O'Keefe's injuries were inconsistent with a vehicle strike, that his body showed no hypothermia, and that the Commonwealth's own medical examiner refused to rule the death a homicide. Jackson also challenged the tail light evidence, noting that 46 fragments appeared only after Proctor had custody of Read's vehicle.

Tim Nuttall - Direct

Tim Nuttall, a Canton firefighter-paramedic, testifies about responding to John O'Keefe lying unresponsive in the snow on January 29, 2022, and hearing Karen Read say 'I hit him' three times while he worked on O'Keefe.

Direct
Tim Nuttall Hank Brennan
314 utt.

Tim Nuttall testified about his background as a firefighter-paramedic and his response to a dispatch for an unresponsive male at 34 Fairview Road around 6 a.m. on January 29, 2022. He described arriving early due to inclement weather, jumping on the ambulance as a volunteer second paramedic, and finding John O'Keefe lying supine in the snow with no pulse, no breathing, and extremely cold skin. Nuttall recounted that while kneeling at O'Keefe's head providing ventilations, he looked up and asked a woman with blood on her face if she knew the patient, and she responded 'I hit him. I hit him. I hit him.' He described the team's resuscitation efforts, O'Keefe's injuries — a hematoma above the right eye, deep scratches on the right arm, and matted blood on the back of his head — and the transport to Good Samaritan Hospital. Dash cam video from cruiser 683 and photographs of the arm injuries and scene were introduced as exhibits.

Tim Nuttall - Cross

Cross-examination of Tim Nuttall by Alan Jackson, challenging inconsistencies between his testimony and physical evidence from the scene.

Cross
Tim Nuttall Alan Jackson
310 utt.

Alan Jackson focused on two areas undermining Tim Nuttall's reliability. First, Jackson established that Nuttall met with prosecutor Brennan three times before testifying, and that all three meetings addressed Nuttall's shift from testifying he heard 'I hit him' twice (Trial 1) to three times (Trial 2) — with Brennan repeatedly confirming Nuttall would stick with the new version. Nuttall acknowledged the inconsistency but maintained three times was his true recollection. Second, Jackson revisited Nuttall's prior testimony that O'Keefe wore a 'puffy heavy coat,' which was completely wrong — O'Keefe was actually in a short-sleeve t-shirt and thin hoodie with no hat and a missing shoe. Jackson then questioned Nuttall about O'Keefe's injuries, establishing the hematoma, laceration, and parallel scratches on the right arm, before the proceeding broke for lunch during a sidebar over an objection to Jackson's question about whether the injuries were consistent with a physical altercation.

Cross
Tim Nuttall Alan Jackson
310 utt.

Alan Jackson resumed cross-examination after lunch by establishing that firefighter-paramedic Katie McLaughlin was also on the call but was not mentioned during direct examination. Jackson then returned to Nuttall's account of hearing Karen Read say 'I hit him,' confronting him with Trooper Proctor's February 8, 2022 report, which recorded a different version — that Read made the statement to another female, not in response to Nuttall's question, and that Read was 'praying over' O'Keefe at the time. Nuttall denied ever saying 'praying' but acknowledged his memory of the Proctor conversation was faulty. Jackson then played dash cam video to demonstrate that during the entire window when Flatley was kneeling and performing CPR — the moment Nuttall placed the statement — Karen Read was either off-frame or standing far from the firefighters, not near Nuttall as his account required. Jackson also secured Nuttall's agreement that the hematoma and laceration over O'Keefe's right eye were consistent with being punched in the face.

Tim Nuttall - Redirect/Recross

Tim Nuttall's redirect and recross address his account of hearing 'I hit him' and observing Officer O'Keefe's injuries. ADA Brennan rehabilitates using the dash cam video; Jackson challenges the credibility of background statements and Nuttall's timeline.

Redirect
Tim Nuttall Hank Brennan
126 utt.

On redirect, ADA Brennan played the timestamped version of the dash cam video (Exhibit 611) to walk Nuttall through the sequence the defense had omitted: Nuttall arriving at 6:10, approaching O'Keefe at 6:11:21, Flatley following, and the defendant running toward the group — the moment Nuttall says she told him 'I hit him.' Brennan then clarified that Nuttall's memory difficulties concerned his interview with Trooper Proctor, not the events of that morning. Brennan highlighted that all visible injuries — hematoma, arm abrasions, blood clotting — were on O'Keefe's right side with none on the left, and that Nuttall's inaccurate clothing description reflected his focus on airway management rather than poor observation. Brennan also addressed the three pre-trial meetings, eliciting that Brennan only told Nuttall to tell the truth and never coached his testimony. Nuttall reaffirmed hearing 'I hit him' three times directed at him and several additional times in the background directed at others.

Recross
Tim Nuttall Alan Jackson
139 utt.

On recross, Alan Jackson attacked two areas of Tim Nuttall's testimony. First, Jackson highlighted that Nuttall's claim of hearing 'I hit him' in the background multiple times only emerged during redirect — never mentioned on direct examination — and got Nuttall to concede that what he actually heard was 'generalized commotion,' not specific words from Karen Read. Second, Jackson methodically walked through the dash cam video timeline, establishing that Nuttall's vivid description of when Read approached him — while Flatley was giving CPR — was contradicted by the video showing Read never came near Nuttall after Flatley began chest compressions. Nuttall attempted to reconcile by saying the statement occurred before the segment Jackson showed, but Jackson demonstrated this conflicted with Nuttall's own prior description. Jackson also established that O'Keefe had a black eye on the left side of his face, contradicting redirect testimony that injuries were limited to the right side.

Redirect
Tim Nuttall Hank Brennan
6 utt.

In a six-utterance redirect, ADA Brennan addressed Jackson's recross suggestion that Nuttall's claim of hearing 'I hit him' in the background was a new addition to his testimony. Brennan asked whether Nuttall had previously testified under oath and in court that he heard the defendant say 'I hit him' separately from when she approached him. Nuttall confirmed he had. The exchange was brief and direct, aimed at neutralizing the defense's implication that the background statements were fabricated during redirect.

Recross
Tim Nuttall Alan Jackson
10 utt.

In a brief second recross, Alan Jackson asked Tim Nuttall whether he told Trooper Proctor during his February 8, 2022 interview — just ten days after the incident — that he heard 'I hit him' repeated in the background. Nuttall said he did not recall. Jackson then asked whether Nuttall made that claim during his grand jury testimony. Nuttall again said he did not recall. Jackson closed by noting that Nuttall's memory is supposedly better now than it was closer to the events.

+1 procedural segment

Kerry Roberts - Direct (Part 1)

Kerry Roberts, a close friend of John O'Keefe, testifies about receiving early-morning calls from Karen Read on January 29, 2022, and the search that led to finding O'Keefe's body at 34 Fairview Road.

Direct
Kerry Roberts Hank Brennan
549 utt.

Kerry Roberts testified about her longtime friendship with John O'Keefe, rooted in their children's shared activities and her role helping him raise his niece and nephew after their parents died. She described being woken at 5:00 a.m. on January 29, 2022, by a screaming call from Karen Read stating 'John's dead,' followed by a second call in which Read said they had drunk heavily and she could not remember anything from the night before. Roberts called the Canton police non-emergency line and two hospitals searching for O'Keefe, then drove through the blizzard to Jennifer McCabe's house, where she noticed a missing piece of Read's Lexus tail light. The three women searched O'Keefe's home without finding him, then drove toward 34 Fairview Road, where Read screamed 'There he is' and ran to a snow-covered mound — which Roberts could not see from the car due to poor visibility. The testimony was interrupted at that point and continued the following day.

Trial 2 Day 2 ▶