Day 34 - June 28, 2024
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 1 · 2 proceedings · 21 lines
The jury sends its first impasse note after four days of deliberations; Judge Cannone rejects a Tuey-Rodriguez instruction and sends jurors home for the weekend.
Full day summary
Key Moments
- The jury sends its first impasse note, declaring they have been unable to reach a unanimous verdict despite an 'exhaustive review of the evidence.'
- ADA Lally argues it is 'far too early' to consider a Tuey-Rodriguez instruction given the trial's complexity and the relatively brief deliberation period.
- Defense attorney Yannetti argues the jury's own language — 'exhaustive' — signals genuine deadlock and requests the Tuey-Rodriguez model instruction.
- Judge Cannone declines to issue the instruction, citing 74 witnesses and 657 exhibits, and orders the jury to continue deliberating.
- Judge Cannone releases the jury for the weekend with standard cautionary instructions, directing them to return Monday morning.
Notable Quotes
Beverly J. Cannone
“We heard from 74 witnesses. There are 657 exhibits, very complex issues in this case. I'm not prepared to find that there have been due and thorough deliberations at this point.”
Cannone cited the length of the trial and deliberations, 74 witnesses, 657 exhibits, and the case's complexity in declining to give the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction.
David Yannetti
“The word 'exhaustive' is the word I think that's operative here. They're communicating to the court that they exhausted all manner of compromise, all manner of persuasion, and they're at an impasse.”
Yannetti focused on the jury's word 'exhaustive' in arguing that the note reported a genuine impasse.
Adam Lally
“I would submit that it is far, far, far too early in their deliberative process to even consider giving them any kind of Tuey-Rodriguez instruction or anything close to that.”
Lally argued that the shortened deliberation time made a Tuey-Rodriguez instruction premature and that the note did not necessarily report deadlock.
7h 32m