Day 30 - June 10, 2025
Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 2 · 7 proceedings · 1,586 utterances
Defense forensic pathologist Dr. Laposata completes testimony ruling out hypothermia and attributing O'Keefe's arm wounds to an animal bite, while biomechanical engineer Dr. Rentschler begins testifying that a Lexus tail light impact cannot generate enough force to cause O'Keefe's skull fracture.
Full day summary
Key Moments
- Judge Cannone issues a compromise ruling: Laposata may testify the arm wounds are consistent with an animal bite but may not present photographs or detailed dog bite analysis.
- Laposata testifies that the absence of Wischnewski ulcers — present in over 90% of hypothermia deaths — rules out hypothermia as O'Keefe's cause of death.
- Brennan establishes on cross that Laposata concluded the vehicle did not strike O'Keefe before reviewing any vehicle data, speed information, or DNA evidence.
- Court allows impeachment of Laposata with a 2005 Rhode Island audit documenting over 1,500 incomplete or unsigned reports and her handling of the Station nightclub fire.
- Dr. Rentschler testifies that drop-testing at 15 mph showed a tail light cover cannot generate sufficient force for an occipital skull fracture, and that the absence of cervical spine injury rules out a vehicle-strike mechanism.
Notable Quotes
Elizabeth Laposata
“No, not at all... those injuries are patterned injuries from an animal bite. We have the canines; we have the incisors.”
The central defense expert opinion of the day — directly challenging the prosecution's tail light theory by attributing O'Keefe's arm wounds to an animal bite pattern.
Elizabeth Laposata
“It did not hit him. So it was not relevant to my opinion. I could — by looking at the body — I could tell that there was no evidence of impact with a vehicle. So whether the vehicle was going slow or fast is not relevant.”
The most damaging concession of the cross-examination: Laposata acknowledges she excluded vehicle impact before reviewing any vehicle-related evidence, the cornerstone of Brennan's methodology attack.
Andrew Rentschler
“A — that the force wasn't sufficient, or the acceleration wasn't sufficient, to produce enough force to cause a skull fracture at 15 miles an hour.”
Rentschler's headline finding closes the day — scientific testing shows a 15 mph tail light impact cannot produce the skull fracture, anchoring the defense's biomechanical case.