Person Nicholas Roberts Trial 1Forensic toxicologist who estimated blood-alcohol levels from a hospital test. ← All People
🔬 Expert Witness · MA Toxicology Lab

Nicholas Roberts

Courtroom still of Nicholas Roberts.

Forensic toxicologist who estimated blood-alcohol levels from a hospital test.

Trial 1
143 lines 4 proceedings

About

Nicholas Roberts testified about a hospital serum test taken from Karen Read at 9:08 a.m. He converted its ethanol result of 93 milligrams per deciliter to an estimated whole-blood concentration of 0.078 to 0.083 gram percent. Using an assumed 12:45 a.m. time, he calculated a retrospective range of 0.125 to 0.292 gram percent. On cross-examination, Roberts agreed that the calculation depended on the hospital result, the timing assumptions and a conversion that cannot be predicted precisely for an individual. He said an invalid test result or drinking after the assumed time could undermine the calculation, and attributed the wide range to the factors involved. On redirect, he said moving the assumed last-drink time to 1:00 a.m. would not significantly change the result, but moving it to 5:00 a.m. would.

Trial Record (4)

Trial 1 First Criminal Trial Apr 29, 2024 – Jul 1, 2024 4 proceedings

Day 18

Direct Nicholas Roberts - Direct Examination Nicholas Roberts Adam Lally 4 highlights 84 lines spoken
Summary

Toxicologist Nicholas Roberts testified about converting Karen Read's hospital serum result and calculated a retrograde blood-alcohol range of 0.125 to 0.292 gram percent.

Highlights (4)
Quote

“So our values that were calculated for the low was a 0.078 gram percent. The high was a 0.083 gram percent with the average being a 0.081.”

States the serum-conversion results Roberts calculated from the hospital result.

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Quote

“And it's just so that it can encompass essentially anybody within the general population that they would be somewhere in between that lower limit and that upper limit.”

Explains why Roberts presented a broad retrograde-extrapolation range rather than one value.

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Key Moment

Roberts described his forensic-science education, State Police Crime Lab toxicology work, proficiency testing, and the laboratory's accreditation requirements.

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Key Moment

Roberts identified his serum-conversion report and testified that the reviewed medical record reported a serum alcohol level of 93 milligrams per deciliter from a specimen collected at 9:08 a.m.

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Cross Nicholas Roberts - Cross Nicholas Roberts Elizabeth Little 2 highlights 49 lines spoken
Summary

Roberts acknowledged that his retrograde blood-alcohol calculation depended on timing assumptions, a hospital test, and variable conversion factors.

Highlights (2)
Quote

“Yeah. You do have to base it on good -- your starting blocks have to be good. So you have to know the times in which the blood was drawn, the time of the incident and essentially what your value was for your BAC.”

Roberts identified the inputs he said were necessary for a reliable extrapolation.

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Quote

“Yeah. There's a large range, like I said, due to the factors involved in the calculation. That's how it gets so large.”

Roberts attributed the breadth of his estimate to the factors in the calculation.

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶
Redirect Nicholas Roberts - Redirect Nicholas Roberts Adam Lally 1 highlights 7 lines spoken
Summary

Roberts said a 5:00 a.m. assumed last drink would significantly affect his calculation, while a 1:00 a.m. drink would not.

Highlights (1)
Quote

“It would have definitely caused a different time frame, depending on how long after the incident or the reported last drink, if there was another drink in between there.”

Roberts explained that the timing of any later drink could alter the retrograde-extrapolation time frame.

Open in transcript → Watch this moment ▶

Locations Touched By This Testimony