Person Nicholas Roberts Trial 1← All People
🔬 Expert Witness · MA Toxicology Lab

Nicholas Roberts

Trial 1 137 lines of testimony
Courtroom still of Nicholas Roberts.

Testimony Impact

Nicholas Roberts, a forensic toxicologist with the Massachusetts Toxicology Lab, testified exclusively in Trial 1 on Day 18. His role was to convert Karen Read's hospital serum alcohol level—drawn at 9:08 a.m. on January 29, 2022—into a whole blood BAC and then extrapolate backward to estimate her BAC at 12:45 a.m., the time prosecutors identified as her last drink. His calculations placed Read's BAC at that earlier time somewhere between 0.135 and 0.292 g percent, a range the prosecution offered as evidence that Read was significantly impaired when she dropped off John O'Keefe.

Challenges & Responses

What attorneys challenged during examination and how the witness responded.

Little challenged Roberts about hospital testing outside State Police forensic-lab accreditation and the large range in his extrapolation. Roberts acknowledged those method and range limits and confirmed that Read did not provide the 12:45 time. Little proposed that a police report supplied it, but that question received no answer.

Notable Quotes From The Record

“The level was at 93 milligrams per deciliter.”

The hospital serum alcohol reading that forms the basis for all subsequent BAC calculations.

“So the values that were calculated — the low was at 0.078 g percent, the high was 0.083 g percent, with the average being 0.081.”

The serum-to-whole-blood conversion result, showing Read's BAC at the time of hospital blood draw (9:08 a.m.) was near the legal limit.

“So the minimum amount that was calculated would have been 0.135 g percent.”

The low end of the retrograde extrapolation — even the minimum estimate places Read at nearly twice the legal limit at 12:45 a.m.

“The result was 0.292 g percent.”

The high end of the retrograde extrapolation, suggesting Read's BAC could have been nearly four times the legal limit.

“It would be difficult, yes.”

Roberts agreed that predicting the serum-to-whole-blood conversion for an individual would be difficult.

“Yeah, almost a sort of 120% swing.”

Roberts characterized the stated BAC range as nearly a 120% swing.

“Uh, yeah.”

Roberts's concession on the final question — any post-12:45 a.m. drinking destroys his analysis — is the culmination of the cross.

“It was given to me that it was at 12:45. And as far as the BAC — or the serum conversion — that was coming from a medical record. So that was known as well, at 9:08 in the morning, the time that the blood was drawn.”

Roberts says that 12:45 a.m. was given to him, while identifying the 9:08 a.m. blood-draw time as coming from a medical record; the testimony does not establish 12:45 a.m. as independently known.

“No.”

Roberts's final answer — that a last drink at 1:00 a.m. rather than 12:45 a.m. would not significantly impact his calculations — is the core rehabilitation point of the redirect.

Key Moments

Locations Touched By This Testimony

Testimony & Transcripts (4)