Skip to content
Commonwealth v. Read— Trial Archive
evidenceevidencephysicalFirst Criminal TrialARCCA Analysis of Tail Light Physical Damage — RentschlerDefense expert Dr. Andrew Rentschler's analysis of the physical damage to the Lexus right rear tail light cover, comparing the observed damage to the damage produced by ARCCA's 15 mph impact testing.
← All Evidence
Physical Evidence

ARCCA Analysis of Tail Light Physical Damage — Rentschler

Defense expert Dr. Andrew Rentschler's analysis of the physical damage to the Lexus right rear tail light cover, comparing the observed damage to the damage produced by ARCCA's 15 mph impact testing.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

Rentschler testified that the actual damage to the tail light was less than what ARCCA's 15 mph testing produced, which the defense used to argue against a higher-speed impact and to undermine the prosecution's collision theory.

Trial Record (1)