Skip to content
evidenceevidenceforensicRetrialARCCA Tail Light Impact Testing — Intact Diffuser SummaryIn closing argument, Alan Jackson said ARCCA's testing showed that, in every test at every speed, the internal diffusers remained intact; this was counsel's advocacy, not underlying expert testimony.
← All Evidence
Forensic Analysis

ARCCA Tail Light Impact Testing — Intact Diffuser Summary

In closing argument, Alan Jackson said ARCCA's testing showed that, in every test at every speed, the internal diffusers remained intact; this was counsel's advocacy, not underlying expert testimony.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

Jackson argued that this testing summary was inconsistent with the severe internal diffuser damage in Karen Read's tail light; the point was advocacy in closing, not a neutral forensic finding or underlying expert testimony.

Trial Record (1)