Skip to content
evidenceevidenceforensicFirst Criminal TrialRetrialUC Davis Canine DNA Lab ReportKun's UC Davis report found no canine DNA and detected pig DNA on clothing swabs, while noting qPCR inhibition. It was included in the defense Dropbox disclosure.
← All Evidence
Forensic Analysis

UC Davis Canine DNA Lab Report

Kun's UC Davis report found no canine DNA and detected pig DNA on clothing swabs, while noting qPCR inhibition. It was included in the defense Dropbox disclosure.

7 proceedings7 mentions2 trials

About

Kun's testing of two later-submitted clothing swabs found no canine DNA in K9 qPCR or dog-focused meat-ID testing, while detecting pig DNA; the prosecution used that result as counterevidence to an animal attack, not as a dispositive finding about event mechanics. Kun tested only the swabs she received and did not collect them or know the source collection process. She said the nuclear result could reflect degradation, inhibition, or no canine nuclear DNA, although the mitochondrial meat-ID control showed no inhibition. In Trial 2, Russell identified no actual process step that went wrong, explaining her concerns through the delay in swabbing and unknown transport and custody.

Teri Kun's UC Davis lab report on canine DNA testing of swabs from O'Keefe's right sleeve and clothing, noting inhibition in qPCR results. Testing found no canine DNA; only pig DNA was detected. The report was part of the defense Dropbox disclosure.

Trial Record (7)