Skip to content
Commonwealth v. Read— Trial Archive
evidenceevidencevideoRetrialCanton PD Opposite Sallyport Camera — 5:07–5:50 p.m. GapSallyport video with a 5:07–5:50 p.m. timestamp gap of about 43 minutes 37 seconds, spanning time before and after the SUV arrived. Testimony did not establish why the interval was missing.
← All Evidence
Video Evidence

Canton PD Opposite Sallyport Camera — 5:07–5:50 p.m. Gap

Sallyport video with a 5:07–5:50 p.m. timestamp gap of about 43 minutes 37 seconds, spanning time before and after the SUV arrived. Testimony did not establish why the interval was missing.

2 proceedings2 mentions1 trial

About

Defense counsel highlighted the timestamp jump as consistent with evidence tampering. The footage and testimony establish a missing interval spanning pre-arrival time and the initial period after the SUV arrived, but do not establish the cause of the gap, vehicle access, or a complete custody conclusion.

Sallyport surveillance footage from the camera facing the right rear taillight area of Read's SUV on January 29, 2022. The video shows a timestamp jump from approximately 5:07:10–5:07:12 to 5:50:47 p.m., an interval of about 43 minutes 37 seconds. The gap begins roughly 22 minutes before the SUV arrived at Canton PD and continues into the initial period after arrival; testimony established that referenced activity did not appear in this feed but did not establish why the interval is missing.

Trial Record (2)