Trial 2 Trial Day
◀ Day 26 Trial 2 Day 28 ▶

Day 27 - June 4, 2025

Judge Beverly J. Cannone · Trial 2 · 8 proceedings · 1,699 utterances

Day 27 of 36
Appearing:

Canton plow driver Brian Loughran testifies he saw no body on the Albert lawn during multiple well-lit passes between 2:45 and 3:40 a.m., while pharmacist Karina Kolokithas describes an affectionate, sober Karen Read at the Waterfall bar hours before O'Keefe's death.

Full day summary

Day 27 centered on two defense witnesses. Brian Loughran, a Canton DPW snowplow driver with 20 years of experience, testified that he made multiple passes of Fairview Road in the early hours of January 29, 2022, saw no body on the Albert front lawn, and observed an unusual Ford Edge parked near the flagpole around 3:30 a.m. — a vehicle the Alberts had never before parked out front. ADA Brennan's cross and two rounds of recross attacked Loughran's credibility through documented timeline inconsistencies across four separate accounts and built a bias narrative suggesting pro-defense bloggers harassed Loughran before Trial 1, then embraced him after his favorable testimony. Defense redirects framed the inconsistencies as arithmetic error and established that Loughran's earliest statement predated any blogger contact by over a year. Karina Kolokithas, a Canton pharmacist, testified to spending approximately 50 minutes face-to-face with Karen Read at the Waterfall bar, observing no signs of impairment, and witnessing an affectionate forehead kiss from O'Keefe. She also described Jennifer McCabe urging Read to come with her as the group left — a detail relevant to the defense's theory about events at 34 Fairview. Brennan's brief cross of Kolokithas focused on humanizing O'Keefe and confirming Read was walking to the driver's side as the couple departed.

  • Loughran testifies he saw no body on the Albert front lawn during plow passes between 2:40 a.m. and 3:40 a.m., with truck lights he described as 'almost as if I had a spotlight.'
  • Loughran places an unusual Ford Edge parked near the Albert flagpole around 3:30 a.m. — a location the family never used for parking.
  • Brennan documents four materially different timelines Loughran gave across a defense PI report, federal law enforcement interview, Trial 1 testimony, and current testimony.
  • Brennan constructs a before/after bias narrative: pro-defense bloggers harassed Loughran before Trial 1, then embraced him after he testified favorably for the defense.
  • Pharmacist Karina Kolokithas testifies Read showed no signs of impairment after 50 minutes of face-to-face conversation, and describes McCabe specifically urging Read to 'come with me' as the group left the Waterfall.
Hank Brennan
“You were no longer being harassed. You were being embraced.”
Brennan's sharpest formulation of his witness-influence theory — that Loughran's testimony was shaped not by independent memory but by social incentives from the pro-defense community.
Karina Kolokithas
“Jen went over to Karen, kind of put her arm around her, and started saying, 'You're coming with me. You're coming with me.' And Karen's like, 'Huh?'”
Kolokithas's account of McCabe's persistent effort to bring Read along as the group left the bar is the day's most legally charged detail, directly feeding the defense theory about who directed events at 34 Fairview.
David Yannetti
“Did you see a 6'1", 216-pound man lying on that lawn?”
Yannetti's question to Loughran crystallizes the day's central evidentiary dispute — whether a 6'1", 216-pound man could have been lying on the Albert lawn during Loughran's well-lit passes without being seen.

Brian Loughran - Direct

Canton DPW snowplow driver Brian Loughran testifies about multiple passes of 34 Fairview Road in the early morning hours of January 29, 2022, stating he saw nothing on the front lawn near the flagpole during any pass before police blocked the road around 6:15 a.m.

Direct
Brian Loughran David Yannetti
579 utt.

Brian Loughran, a Canton DPW snowplow driver with 20 years of experience, testified about his plowing route on January 29, 2022. He made two complete up-and-down passes of Fairview Road — the first around 2:40–2:45 a.m. and the second around 3:30–3:40 a.m. — seeing nothing on the Albert front lawn near the flagpole on any pass. On the second set of passes, he noticed a Ford Edge parked on the street adjacent to the Albert property near the flagpole, which was unusual because the Alberts never parked vehicles out front. Loughran chose not to report the parking violation out of respect for the Albert family. When he returned a third time around 6:15 a.m. from the Chapman Street side, police vehicles with blue lights blocked the road. Yannetti also established that no law enforcement contacted Loughran — the defense's private investigator reached him approximately two weeks after the incident, while state police did not contact him until 2023.

+1 procedural segment

Brian Loughran - Cross

Prosecution cross-examines Brian Loughran on timeline inconsistencies across multiple prior statements and explores whether social media pressure from a pro-defense blogger influenced his testimony.

Cross
Brian Loughran Hank Brennan
507 utt.

ADA Brennan cross-examined Canton DPW plow driver Brian Loughran, a defense witness, on two main fronts. First, Brennan spent significant time exploring whether Loughran had been pressured or influenced by a pro-defense online blogger who recorded phone calls with Loughran, published content about him, and had a large social media following — though Loughran consistently denied feeling threatened or pressured. Second, Brennan methodically catalogued inconsistencies in Loughran's timeline across four different accounts: the defense PI report, a federal law enforcement interview, Trial 1 testimony, and current testimony. The times for his final Fairview pass varied from 3:30-4:00 (PI), to 3:00-3:30 (law enforcement), to 5:30 (Trial 1), to 6:15 (current testimony). Brennan also challenged whether Loughran saw the Ford Edge from Fairview or from Cedarcrest Road approximately 300 feet away, and used Ring camera footage to test whether Loughran could identify his own truck in the dark conditions. Loughran could only definitively identify himself in two of approximately seven video clips shown.

Brian Loughran - Redirect/Recross

Defense redirect rehabilitates Loughran's credibility on timeline and basketball hoop details; prosecution recross challenges the reliability of his memory-based account and questions whether media attention influenced his testimony.

Redirect
Brian Loughran David Yannetti
37 utt.

Defense attorney Yannetti addressed three points raised during Brennan's cross-examination. First, he established that Loughran gave his statement to the defense investigator just two weeks after January 29, 2022, when events were fresh — countering the implication of inconsistency across later accounts. Second, Yannetti had Loughran describe the basketball hoop he struck as a portable unit with a wheeled base, clarifying that the plow only caught the hanging net and part of the frame — minimizing the suggestion that hitting it reflected poor visibility or inattention. Third, Yannetti directly confronted the Trial 1 timeline discrepancy: Loughran had testified to both a 3-hour gap after his 3:30 pass and a 5:30 final time, which are arithmetically inconsistent. Loughran acknowledged the math error and confirmed the final pass was 6:15–6:30 a.m., consistent with his current testimony.

Recross
Brian Loughran Hank Brennan
51 utt.

ADA Brennan conducted a brief recross focusing on two themes. First, he obtained concessions that Loughran's timeline for his plow passes was entirely reconstructed from memory — he had no watch, no schedule, and was giving estimates. Brennan then pivoted to the media attention surrounding the case, establishing that a blogger published an article about Loughran on June 5, 2023 — the same day Loughran spoke with the defense investigator. Brennan showed Loughran a document dated that day and confirmed that community members were sending Loughran similar material. The proceeding ended with a sidebar request, suggesting Brennan sought to pursue this line further.

Recross
Brian Loughran Hank Brennan
90 utt.

After a break, ADA Brennan corrected a date error (the defense investigator meeting was June 5, 2024, not 2023) and briefly tested Loughran's observational awareness by showing Exhibit 71 — a video still revealing a large red dumpster across from Fairview Road that Loughran had no memory of. Brennan then spent the bulk of the proceeding establishing that before Trial 1, pro-defense individuals published private photos of Loughran from different periods of his life without permission, called his boss, attacked his finances online, and dragged his brother into the case — all of which Loughran found 'aggravating.' Brennan contrasted this pre-testimony harassment with the post-testimony shift: after testifying, Loughran was 'embraced' rather than attacked, and Brennan introduced a photograph (with redactions) depicting this change. The implication was that Loughran's testimony may have been shaped by the social reward of aligning with pro-defense interests.

Redirect
Brian Loughran David Yannetti
6 utt.

In a brief re-redirect of six utterances, defense attorney Yannetti asked a single clarifying question to counter Brennan's implication that blogger attention influenced Loughran's testimony. Yannetti established that Loughran's statement to the defense investigator was given in February 2022 — long before any blogger contact or social media attention began in 2023. Loughran confirmed the timeline, and the witness was then excused by Judge Cannone.

+1 procedural segment

Karina Kolokithas - Direct/Cross

Defense witness Karina Kolokithas, a Canton pharmacist, testifies about her observations of Karen Read at Waterfall bar on January 28, 2022, describing her demeanor as coherent and unimpaired. Surveillance video corroborates her account of Read and John O'Keefe departing together.

Direct
Karina Kolokithas David Yannetti
379 utt.

Karina Kolokithas, a Canton pharmacist, testifies for the defense about the evening of January 28, 2022. She describes arriving at the Waterfall bar around 9:30 PM and spending approximately 50 minutes in face-to-face conversation with Karen Read, finding her coherent, engaged, and showing no signs of impairment. She recounts John O'Keefe arriving in high spirits about his niece's acceptance to Bishop Feehan and kissing Read on the forehead — a gesture Kolokithas found notably affectionate. Surveillance video (Exhibit 22) is played showing the forehead kiss, the positions of Chris Albert, Brian Albert, and Brian Higgins in a separate grouping, and the departure sequence. Kolokithas testifies that Jennifer McCabe told Read 'you're coming with me' as they left, but Read instead walked with O'Keefe toward her parked car near the former Amber Road Cafe.

Cross
Karina Kolokithas Hank Brennan
28 utt.

Hank Brennan's cross-examination lasts under two minutes and asks no adversarial questions. He confirms that Kolokithas's last image of Read and O'Keefe was both walking to the car with Read heading to the driver's side. He then establishes the celebratory atmosphere at the bar, that Kolokithas spent most of her time talking with Read and saw her hugging Jennifer McCabe, and elicits a series of character descriptions of O'Keefe — kind, generous, thoughtful, soft-spoken — culminating in his particular pride that evening over his niece's acceptance to private school. Brennan closes by confirming Kolokithas spoke directly with O'Keefe that night.

+1 procedural segment
◀ Day 26 Trial 2 Day 28 ▶